Review
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a007906.TCF/LEFs and Wnt signaling in the nucleus
Affiliations
- PMID:23024173
- PMCID: PMC3536346
- DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a007906
Item in Clipboard
Review
TCF/LEFs and Wnt signaling in the nucleus
Ken M Cadigan et al. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol..
Display options
Format
Display options
Format
Abstract
T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF) transcription factors are the major end point mediators of Wnt/Wingless signaling throughout metazoans. TCF/LEFs are multifunctional proteins that use their sequence-specific DNA-binding and context-dependent interactions to specify which genes will be regulated by Wnts. Much of the work to define their actions has focused on their ability to repress target gene expression when Wnt signals are absent and to recruit β-catenin to target genes for activation when Wnts are present. Recent advances have highlighted how these on/off actions are regulated by Wnt signals and stabilized β-catenin. In contrast to invertebrates, which typically contain one TCF/LEF protein that can both activate and repress Wnt targets, gene duplication and isoform complexity of the family in vertebrates have led to specialization, in which individual TCF/LEF isoforms have distinct activities.
Figures
Hallmarks of the TCF/LEF family. (A) Schematic of TCF domains, showing the location of five conserved domains found in this family, the amino-terminal β-catenin-binding domain, the Groucho binding sequence (GBS), the high-mobility group (HMG) domain followed by a nuclear localization signal (basic tail), and the C clamp. The specific TCF shown is from the sea urchinStrongylocentrotus purpuratus. (B) Alignments of the five domains from six invertebrate TCFs and the four human family members. Consensus residues are highlighted in dark gray with conservative changes in light gray. The extent of conservation is far greater in the HMG, basic tail, and C-clamp domains compared with the β-catenin-binding domain and GBS. Three residues in the β-catenin-binding domain that contact β-catenin and are essential for interaction are marked with asterisks (Graham et al. 2000; Poy et al. 2001). A GBS could not be identified in TCF/LEFs from porifera and cnidarians and some flatworms, whereas a C clamp is found in nearly all invertebrate TCFs (it is not found in some flatworm TCF/LEFs) and in some vertebrate TCF1 and TCF4 isoforms. The sequences shown are from the spongeAmphimedon queenslandica (gene bank accession number ADO16566.1), the cnidarianHydra magnipapillata (XP_002159974.1), the parasitic flatwormSchistosoma mansoni (XP_002572116.1), the nematodeCaenorhabditis elegans (NP_491053.3), the dipteranDrosophila melanogaster (NP_726522), the sea urchinStrongylocentrotus purpuratus (NP_999640) and human TCF1E (EAW62279.1), TCF4E (CAB97213.1), and LEF1 (NP_001124185), and TCF3 (NP_112573.1).
High-mobility group DNA-binding domain (HMG DBD) and Helper sites ofDrosophila and vertebrate TCF/LEFs. Sequence logos were constructed from TCF/Pangolin sites described in Chang et al. (2008) and from a collection of vertebrate Wnt-regulated enhancers (N Hoverter, ML Waterman, and KM Cadigan, unpubl.).
Regulation of TCF/LEFs in invertebrates and vertebrates. (A) Most invertebrates have one TCF/LEF gene producing a protein that can recruit corepressors to Wnt targets in the absence of signaling. (B) In vertebrates, TCF/LEFs are more specialized, with TCF3 often fulfilling this repressive role. (C) When high levels of β-catenin are found in the nucleus after Wnt signaling, it binds to invertebrate TCF, displacing (or inactivating) corepressors and recruiting coactivators through its amino- and carboxy-terminal transactivation domains. (D) For at least some vertebrate Wnt targets, a TCF/LEF exchange occurs, in which Wnt/β-catenin signaling promotes HIPK2-dependent phosphorylation of TCF3, causing it to leave Wnt target gene chromatin, allowing TCF1-β-catenin to occupy the WRE, facilitating transcriptional activation. See text for more information.
TCF/LEF isoform diversity. (A) Schematic of theLEF1 locus with two promoters. The first promoter produces an mRNA with an internal ribosome entry site in the 5′ UTR (encoded by exon1) (Jimenez et al. 2005; Tsai et al. 2011). A second promoter in intron2 produces a truncated, dominant–negative form of LEF1 missing the β-catenin-binding domain (green rectangle) (Hovanes et al. 2001; Li et al. 2006). Red and blue domains are the HMG and basic domains for DNA binding (refer to Fig. 1). (B) Schematic of theTCF7 locus (which codes for TCF1). Similar toLEF1, theTCF7 locus codes for full-length and dominant–negative forms through the use of two promoters (van de Wetering et al. 1996). (C) TheTCF7L2 locus (codes for TCF4) produces multiple truncated isoforms in addition to the full-length form. A putative intron1 promoter has been proposed that produces a dnTCF4 similar to dnLEF1 and dnTCF1 (Duval et al. 2000). A third promoter in intron5 has been defined (Vacik and Lemke 2011). This promoter produces a dnTCF4 isoform because it is missing the β-catenin- binding domain. The promoter lies immediately downstream from a 92-kb genomic interval (yellow rectangle) that contains the strongest known risk alleles for type 2 diabetes (black asterisk; rs7903146 and rs12255372 [Grant et al. 2006]) as well as an alternative polyadenylation signal that might produce the previously discovered inhibitory form referred to as TCF4N (red asterisk) (Kennell et al. 2003; Locke et al. 2011).
TCF/LEF phosphorylation sites for HIPK2, LIT1/NLK, and TNIK. Amino acid alignment of human LEF1, TCF3, and TCF4 and theC. elegans ortholog POP1. The indicated regions are amino terminal of the HMG domain. Residues in red are validated, mapped phosphorylation sites by the kinase HIPK2 (Hikasa and Sokol 2011), the kinase NLK and itsC. elegans ortholog LIT1 (Ishitani et al. 2003; Lo et al. 2004), and TNIK (Mahmoudi et al. 2009).
References
- Adamska M, Larroux C, Adamski M, Green K, Lovas E, Koop D, Richards GS, Zwafink C, Degnan BM 2010. Structure and expression of conserved Wnt pathway components in the desmosponge Amphimedon queenslandica. Evol Dev 12: 494–518 - PubMed
- Almeida M, Han L, Martin-Millan M, O’Brien CA, Manolagas SC 2007. Oxidative stress antagonizes Wnt signaling in osteoblast precursors by diverting β-catenin from T cell factor- to forkhead box O-mediated transcription. J Biol Chem 282: 27298–27305 - PubMed
- Arce L, Yokoyama NN, Waterman ML 2006. Diversity of LEF/TCF action in development and disease. Oncogene 25: 7492–7504 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources