Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices
- PMID:22996129
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b7d
Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices
Abstract
Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC)—intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implant—are safe and appropriate contraceptive methods for most women and adolescents. The LARC methods are top-tier contraceptives based on effectiveness, with pregnancy rates of less than 1% per year for perfect use and typical use. These contraceptives have the highest rates of satisfaction and continuation of all reversible contraceptives. Adolescents are at high risk of unintended pregnancy and may benefit from increased access to LARC methods.
Similar articles
- Increasing LARC utilization: any woman, any place, any time.Hathaway M, Torres L, Vollett-Krech J, Wohltjen H.Hathaway M, et al.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;57(4):718-30. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000071.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014.PMID:25314089Review.
- Long-acting reversible contraception.Peck SA.Peck SA.Nurs Womens Health. 2013 Oct;17(5):431-5. doi: 10.1111/1751-486X.12066.Nurs Womens Health. 2013.PMID:24138662
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 735: Adolescents and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices.[No authors listed][No authors listed]Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):e130-e139. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002632.Obstet Gynecol. 2018.PMID:29683910
- Long-acting reversible contraceptive acceptability and unintended pregnancy among women presenting for short-acting methods: a randomized patient preference trial.Hubacher D, Spector H, Monteith C, Chen PL, Hart C.Hubacher D, et al.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;216(2):101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.033. Epub 2016 Sep 20.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017.PMID:27662799Free PMC article.Clinical Trial.
- Increasing Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception to Decrease Unplanned Pregnancy.Lotke PS.Lotke PS.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015 Dec;42(4):557-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.07.008.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015.PMID:26598299Review.
Cited by
- Counseling Adolescents About the Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Comparison of Primary Care Pediatricians With Family Physicians and Obstetrician-Gynecologists in the Bronx, New York.Rubin SE, Cohen HW, Santelli JS, McKee MD.Rubin SE, et al.J Prim Care Community Health. 2015 Jul;6(3):162-9. doi: 10.1177/2150131914568460. Epub 2015 Jan 27.J Prim Care Community Health. 2015.PMID:25628297Free PMC article.
- Adolescent and Young Adult Women's Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Etonogestrel Implants.Bachorik A, Friedman J, Fox A, Nucci AT, Horowitz CR, Diaz A.Bachorik A, et al.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Aug;28(4):229-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 12.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015.PMID:26024942Free PMC article.
- Beyond the Surface: Care Seeking Among Patients Initiating Contraceptive Implant in an Urban Federally Qualified Health Center Network.Ravi A, Prine L, deFiebre G, Rubin SE.Ravi A, et al.J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Jan;8(1):20-25. doi: 10.1177/2150131916666011. Epub 2016 Sep 19.J Prim Care Community Health. 2017.PMID:27587354Free PMC article.
- Immediate Versus Delayed Insertion of the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device in Postpartum Adolescents: A Randomized Pilot Study.Soon R, McGuire K, Salcedo J, Kaneshiro B.Soon R, et al.Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2018 Mar;77(3):60-65.Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2018.PMID:29541551Free PMC article.Clinical Trial.
- New developments in intrauterine device use: focus on the US.Nelson AL, Massoudi N.Nelson AL, et al.Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Sep 13;7:127-141. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S85755. eCollection 2016.Open Access J Contracept. 2016.PMID:29386944Free PMC article.Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical