Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts?--a meta-analysis of European research
- PMID:22947228
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.018
Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts?--a meta-analysis of European research
Abstract
Organic farming practices have been promoted as, inter alia, reducing the environmental impacts of agriculture. This meta-analysis systematically analyses published studies that compare environmental impacts of organic and conventional farming in Europe. The results show that organic farming practices generally have positive impacts on the environment per unit of area, but not necessarily per product unit. Organic farms tend to have higher soil organic matter content and lower nutrient losses (nitrogen leaching, nitrous oxide emissions and ammonia emissions) per unit of field area. However, ammonia emissions, nitrogen leaching and nitrous oxide emissions per product unit were higher from organic systems. Organic systems had lower energy requirements, but higher land use, eutrophication potential and acidification potential per product unit. The variation within the results across different studies was wide due to differences in the systems compared and research methods used. The only impacts that were found to differ significantly between the systems were soil organic matter content, nitrogen leaching, nitrous oxide emissions per unit of field area, energy use and land use. Most of the studies that compared biodiversity in organic and conventional farming demonstrated lower environmental impacts from organic farming. The key challenges in conventional farming are to improve soil quality (by versatile crop rotations and additions of organic material), recycle nutrients and enhance and protect biodiversity. In organic farming, the main challenges are to improve the nutrient management and increase yields. In order to reduce the environmental impacts of farming in Europe, research efforts and policies should be targeted to developing farming systems that produce high yields with low negative environmental impacts drawing on techniques from both organic and conventional systems.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
- Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products--are the differences captured by life cycle assessment?Meier MS, Stoessel F, Jungbluth N, Juraske R, Schader C, Stolze M.Meier MS, et al.J Environ Manage. 2015 Feb 1;149:193-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Nov 9.J Environ Manage. 2015.PMID:25463583
- A whole-farm strategy to reduce environmental impacts of nitrogen.Sonneveld MP, Schröder JJ, de Vos JA, Monteny GJ, Mosquera J, Hol JM, Lantinga EA, Verhoeven FP, Bouma J.Sonneveld MP, et al.J Environ Qual. 2008 Jan 4;37(1):186-95. doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0434. Print 2008 Jan-Feb.J Environ Qual. 2008.PMID:18178892
- Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.Nguyen TT, Doreau M, Eugène M, Corson MS, Garcia-Launay F, Chesneau G, van der Werf HM.Nguyen TT, et al.Animal. 2013 May;7(5):860-9. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112002200. Epub 2012 Nov 29.Animal. 2013.PMID:23190866
- Adsorption and desorption of chlorpyrifos to soils and sediments.Gebremariam SY, Beutel MW, Yonge DR, Flury M, Harsh JB.Gebremariam SY, et al.Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012;215:123-75. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1463-6_3.Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012.PMID:22057931Review.
- Effects of organic farming on biodiversity and ecosystem services: taking landscape complexity into account.Winqvist C, Ahnström J, Bengtsson J.Winqvist C, et al.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1249:191-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06413.x. Epub 2012 Feb 15.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012.PMID:22335471Review.
Cited by
- Economic and carbon emission performance of green farming by marketing cooperatives.Zheng Q, Liu J, Hongbin Sun.Zheng Q, et al.Heliyon. 2023 May 3;9(5):e15913. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15913. eCollection 2023 May.Heliyon. 2023.PMID:37215799Free PMC article.
- Sustainable soil management practices provide additional benefit for energy use efficiency.Aghabeygi M, Strauss V, Bayer L, Paul C, Helming K.Aghabeygi M, et al.Heliyon. 2024 Oct 16;10(20):e39417. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39417. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.Heliyon. 2024.PMID:39498094Free PMC article.
- Global warming potential and greenhouse gas emission under different soil nutrient management practices in soybean-wheat system of central India.Lenka S, Lenka NK, Singh AB, Singh B, Raghuwanshi J.Lenka S, et al.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Feb;24(5):4603-4612. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-8189-5. Epub 2016 Dec 12.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017.PMID:27957695
- Challenges and opportunities when moving food production and consumption toward sustainable diets in the Nordics: a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023.Meltzer HM, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Trolle E, Fantke P, Helenius J, Olesen JE, Saarinen M, Maage A, Ydersbond TA.Meltzer HM, et al.Food Nutr Res. 2024 Apr 15;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10489. eCollection 2024.Food Nutr Res. 2024.PMID:38716354Free PMC article.
- Position of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior: The Importance of Including Environmental Sustainability in Dietary Guidance.Rose D, Heller MC, Roberto CA.Rose D, et al.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Jan;51(1):3-15.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.07.006.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019.PMID:30635107Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources