Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

.2012 Mar 1;19(2):66-74.
doi: 10.1044/lle19.2.66.

Categorization in ASD: The Role of Typicality and Development

Affiliations

Categorization in ASD: The Role of Typicality and Development

Holly Zajac Gastgeb et al. Perspect Lang Learn Educ..

Abstract

There is a growing amount of evidence suggesting that individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) differ in the way in which they cognitively process information. A critical aspect of cognitive processing that is receiving more attention in studies of ASD is categorization. The studies presented here examined the effect of typicality on categorization of objects and gender in high-functioning children, adolescents, and adults with ASD and matched controls. The ASD and control groups showed improved categorization throughout the lifespan for typical and somewhat typical object category members and typical gender faces. However, individuals with ASD took more time to categorize atypical object category members and were less accurate in categorizing atypical gender faces from 8-12 years through adulthood. The implications of these results for teaching categories and category labels to individuals with ASD will be discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of typical, somewhat typical, and atypical objects
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percent change in reaction time for children, adolescents, and adults on the object categorization task.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Examples of typical and atypical female faces
Figure 4
Figure 4
Accuracy scores for children, adolescents, and adults on the gender categorization task.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000. Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)
    1. Barrett M. Early lexical development. In: Fletcher P, Macwhinney B, editors. The Handbook of Child Language. Oxford, England: Blackwell; 1995. pp. 362–392.
    1. Bomba PC, Siqueland ER. The nature and structure of infant form categories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 1983;35:294–328.
    1. Brown E, Perrett D. What gives a face its gender. Perception. 1993;22:829–840. - PubMed
    1. Chronicle EP, Chan MY, Hawkings C, Mason K, Smethurst K, Stallybrass K. You can tell by the nose - judging sex from an isolate facial feature. Perception. 1995;24:969–973. - PubMed

Related information

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp