The legal risks of returning results of genomics research
- PMID:22323070
- PMCID: PMC3779603
- DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.10
The legal risks of returning results of genomics research
Abstract
Published guidelines suggest that research results and incidental findings should be offered to study participants under some circumstances. Although some have argued against the return of results in research, many cite an emerging consensus that there is an ethical obligation to return at least some results; the debate quickly turns to issues of mechanics (e.g., which results? who discloses? for how long does the obligation exist?). Although commentators are careful to distinguish this as an ethical rather than legal obligation, we worry that return of results may unjustifiably become standard of care based on this growing "consensus," which could quickly lead to a legal (negligence-based) duty to offer and return individualized genetic research results. We caution against this and argue in this essay that the debate to date has failed to give adequate weight to a number of fundamental ethical and policy issues that should undergird policy on return of research results in the first instance, many of which go to the fundamental differences between research and clinical care. We confine our comments to research using data from large biobanks, the topic of the guidelines proposed in this symposium issue.
Conflict of interest statement
DISCLOSURE
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
- A closer look revisited: are we subjects or are we donors?Fisher R.Fisher R.Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):458-60. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.6. Epub 2012 Feb 23.Genet Med. 2012.PMID:22361901
- Return of research results from genomic biobanks: cost matters.Bledsoe MJ, Clayton EW, McGuire AL, Grizzle WE, O'Rourke PP, Zeps N.Bledsoe MJ, et al.Genet Med. 2013 Feb;15(2):103-5. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.105. Epub 2012 Aug 30.Genet Med. 2013.PMID:22935716Free PMC article.No abstract available.
- Can I be sued for that? Liability risk and the disclosure of clinically significant genetic research findings.McGuire AL, Knoppers BM, Zawati MH, Clayton EW.McGuire AL, et al.Genome Res. 2014 May;24(5):719-23. doi: 10.1101/gr.170514.113. Epub 2014 Mar 27.Genome Res. 2014.PMID:24676095Free PMC article.
- Should genetic findings from genome research be reported back to the participants?Steinsbekk KS, Solberg B.Steinsbekk KS, et al.Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012 Oct 16;132(19):2190-3. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0078.Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012.PMID:23243670Review.English, Norwegian.
- Funding considerations for the disclosure of genetic incidental findings in biobank research.Black L, Avard D, Zawati MH, Knoppers BM, Hébert J, Sauvageau G; Leucegene Project.Black L, et al.Clin Genet. 2013 Nov;84(5):397-406. doi: 10.1111/cge.12190. Epub 2013 Jun 10.Clin Genet. 2013.PMID:23662709Free PMC article.Review.
Cited by
- Views of genetics health professionals on the return of genomic results.Grove ME, Wolpert MN, Cho MK, Lee SS, Ormond KE.Grove ME, et al.J Genet Couns. 2014 Aug;23(4):531-8. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9611-5. Epub 2013 Jun 2.J Genet Couns. 2014.PMID:23728783Free PMC article.
- An Examination of the Ethical and Legal Limits in Implementing "Traceback Testing" for Deceased Patients.Martucci J, Prado Y, Rope AF, Weinmann S, White L, Zepp J, Henrikson NB, Feigelson HS, Hunter JE, Lee SS.Martucci J, et al.J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(4):818-832. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.23.J Law Med Ethics. 2022.PMID:36883408Free PMC article.
- Key Expert Stakeholder Perceptions of the Law of Genomics: Identified Problems and Potential Solutions.Cheung FY, Clatch L, Wolf SM, Clayton EW, Lawrenz F.Cheung FY, et al.J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Mar;48(1):87-104. doi: 10.1177/1073110520916997.J Law Med Ethics. 2020.PMID:32342788Free PMC article.
- Finding Fault? Exploring Legal Duties to Return Incidental Findings in Genomic Research.Pike ER, Rothenberg KH, Berkman BE.Pike ER, et al.Georgetown Law J. 2014;102:795-843.Georgetown Law J. 2014.PMID:25346543Free PMC article.
- Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.Wolf SM, Branum R, Koenig BA, Petersen GM, Berry SA, Beskow LM, Daly MB, Fernandez CV, Green RC, LeRoy BS, Lindor NM, O'Rourke PP, Breitkopf CR, Rothstein MA, Van Ness B, Wilfond BS.Wolf SM, et al.J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):440-63. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12288.J Law Med Ethics. 2015.PMID:26479555Free PMC article.
References
- Kaufman D, Murphy J, Scott J, Hudson K. Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genet Med. 2008;10:831–839. - PubMed
- Fabsitz RR, McGuire A, Sharp RR, et al. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010;3:574–580. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources