Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Public Library of Science full text link Public Library of Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028705. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

'Nedoceratops': an example of a transitional morphology

Affiliations

'Nedoceratops': an example of a transitional morphology

John B Scannella et al. PLoS One.2011.

Abstract

Background: The holotype and only specimen of the chasmosaurine ceratopsid dinosaur 'Nedoceratops hatcheri' has been the source of considerable taxonomic debate since its initial description. At times it has been referred to its own genus while at others it has been considered synonymous with the contemporaneous chasmosaurine Triceratops. Most recently, the debate has focused on whether the specimen represents an intermediate ontogenetic stage between typical young adult Triceratops and the proposed mature morphology, which was previously considered to represent a distinct genus, 'Torosaurus'.

Methodology/principal findings: The only specimen of 'Nedoceratops hatcheri' was examined and the proposed diagnostic features of this taxon were compared with other chasmosaurine ceratopsids. Every suggested autapomorphy of 'Nedoceratops' is found in specimens of Triceratops. In this study, Triceratops includes the adult 'Torosaurus' morphology. The small parietal fenestra and elongate squamosals of Nedoceratops are consistent with a transition from a short, solid parietal-squamosal frill to an expanded, fenestrated condition. Objections to this hypothesis regarding the number of epiossifications of the frill and alternations of bone surface texture were explored through a combination of comparative osteology and osteohistology. The synonymy of the three taxa was further supported by these investigations.

Conclusions/significance: The Triceratops, 'Torosaurus', and 'Nedoceratops' morphologies represent ontogenetic variation within a single genus of chasmosaurine: Triceratops. This study highlights how interpretations of dinosaur paleobiology, biodiversity, and systematics may be affected by ascribing ontogenetic and other intraspecific variation a taxonomic significance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests:The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. USNM 2412, the holotype and only specimen of ‘Nedoceratops hatcheri’.
A. Left lateral view.B. Right lateral view. Scale bars equal 10 cm.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Nasal horn variation inTriceratops.
A. USNM 4720, originally named the holotype ofTriceratops ‘obtusus.’ This specimen preserves a very low, blunt nasal horn.B. USNM 2412, the holotype of ‘Nedoceratops hatcheri.’ The nasal horn of this specimen (if present – see discussion) is a low, smooth boss.C. UCMP 128561, originally named the holotype of ‘Ugrosaurus olsoni.’ The nasal horn of this specimen is a low rugose boss.D. MOR 981 (previously ‘Torosaurus’). This specimen bears a low boss which is undifferentiated from the nasals. Scale bars equal 10 cm.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Ventral view of the right half of the parietal of USNM 2412.
A. When viewed with offset lighting, the rim of a shallow depression surrounding the small fenestra is apparent.B. Extent of the depression is outlined. The area within the outline is markedly thinner than the remainder of the parietal. The extent of the depression is partially obscured by the framework which supports the skull. Scale bars equal 10 cm.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Dorsal view of the parietal fenestra of USNM 2412.
Although much of the parietal is obscured by reconstruction, a transition in surface texture from the posterior margin (white arrow) to the area immediately adjacent to and surrounding the fenestra (red arrows) is apparent. Scale bar equals 10 cm.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Lateral views of USNM 1201 and USNM 2142.
A. Left lateral view of USNM 1201, originally named the holotype ofTriceratops ‘elatus.’ Note that the ventral extremity of the squamosal (denoted by upper horizontal line) is positioned well above the alveolar process of the maxilla (denoted by lower horizontal line).B. USNM 2412, right lateral view (reversed for direct comparison with USNM 1201 which only preserves the left side of the skull; the right squamosal of USNM 2412 is more elevated than the left). The alveolar process of the maxilla is positioned on the lower horizontal line, allowing for a direct comparison with USNM 1201. Note that the squamosal is not elevated to the extent found in USNM 1201. The position of the ventral extremity above the alveolar process of the maxilla can thus not be used to distinguish ‘Nedoceratops hatcheri’ fromTriceratops. Scale bars equal 10 cm.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Episquamosal of MOR 2975.
The presence of two peaks is suggestive of midline erosion. Scale bar equals 5 cm.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Ventral view of the parietal of MOR 1122.
A. The entire parietal with midline denoted by vertical line. Dashed rectangle indicates area of interest in B and C.B. Impressed vascular traces are found over the entire ventral surface of the parietal. Epiparietals are indicated by arrows. MOR 1122 does not appear to possess an epiparietal over the midline of the parietal.C. Major vascular traces are highlighted in red. Note that the most prominent vascular traces lead to the epiparietals (highlighted in blue). Two large vascular traces lead to the midline of the parietal (denoted by red arrow), suggesting that an epiparietal occupied this position but was lost taphonomically. Scale bars equal 10 cm.
Figure 8
Figure 8. Osteohistology of the postorbital horn core of MOR 981.
The dense, multigenerational ‘Haversian’ tissue is indicative of a mature individual.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Marsh OC. Notice of gigantic horned Dinosauria from the Cretaceous. Am J Sci, series. 1889;3:173–175.
    1. Ostrom JH, Wellnhofer P. The Munich specimen of Triceratops with a revision of the genus. Zitteliana. 1986;14:111–158.
    1. Dodson P. The Horned Dinosaurs. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1996. 346
    1. Forster CA. Species resolution in Triceratops: cladistic and morphometric approaches. J Vertebr Paleontol. 1996;16:259–270.
    1. Marsh OC. Notice of new vertebrate fossils. Am JSci, series. 1891;3:265–269.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Public Library of Science full text link Public Library of Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp