Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Nature Publishing Group full text link Nature Publishing Group Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2011 Oct 16;14(11):1410-2.
doi: 10.1038/nn.2952.

PDZ binding of TARPγ-8 controls synaptic transmission but not synaptic plasticity

Affiliations

PDZ binding of TARPγ-8 controls synaptic transmission but not synaptic plasticity

Akio Sumioka et al. Nat Neurosci..

Abstract

The reduction in synaptic transmission and plasticity in mice lacking the hippocampus-enriched AMPA receptor (AMPAR) auxiliary subunit TARPγ-8 could be a result of a reduction in AMPAR expression or of the direct action of γ-8. We generated TARPγ-8Δ4 knock-in mice lacking the C-terminal PDZ ligand. We found that synaptic transmission and AMPARs were reduced in the mutant mice, but extrasynaptic AMPAR expression and long-term potentiation (LTP) were unaltered. Our findings suggest that there are distinct TARP-dependent mechanisms for synaptic transmission and LTP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
TARP©-8 PDZ binding is necessary for synaptic localization of AMPARs. (a) diagram of the synaptic AMPAR/TARP/PSD-95 complex. The PDZ ligand (–TTPV) is deleted. (b) The anti-©-8 antibody recognized ©-8 in bothγ-8+/+ andγ-8Δ4/Δ4, whereas anti-TTPV antibody recognized ©-8 only in WT. Brain lysates were immunoprecipitated with normal rabbit IgG (control) or anti ©-8 antibody, followed by western blotting. All full and uncropped blots are shown in Supplementary Figure 7. (c) PSD-95 is not associated with ©-8⊗4in vivo. PSD-95 was co-immunoprecipitated with ©-8 inγ-8+/+, but not inγ-8Δ4/Δ4 mice. (d) Protein levels of ©-8, GluA1, and GluA2/3 were somewhat decreased in hippocampi in a ©-8⊗4 gene dosage-dependent manner (n=4). (e, f) Protein levels of ©-8, GluA1, and GluA2/3 in the PSD fraction from hippocampus were reduced inγ-8Δ4/Δ4 mice, but not in the Triton X-100-solublized synaptosome fraction (Syn/Tx). In contrast, expression of ©-8, GluA1, and GluA2/3 in the Syn/Tx fraction was significantly reduced inγ-8−/− mice, but not inγ-8Δ4/Δ4 mice. (f) Protein levels were normalized to those fromγ-8+/+ mice (n=4). Synaptophysin (Sph) was used as a non-PSD protein. All data are given as mean ± s.e.m.; *P < 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The ©-8 PDZ ligand modulates AMPAR-mediated basal transmission, but not LTP.(a) Ratio of AMPAR- to NMDAR-EPSCs is reduced by ~30% in CA1 pyramidal cells fromγ-8Δ4/Δ4 slices (n=11) compared with those fromγ-8+/+ slices (n=5). Representative examples of averaged EPSCs (AMPAR current=light trace; NMDAR current=dark trace). Calibration: 100 ms, 20 pA (+/+) and 16 pA (⊗4/⊗4).(b) Ratio of stimulus intensity (input) to the EPSP slope (output). Input-output was significantly reduced in slices fromγ-8Δ4/Δ4 (n=6) compared to those fromγ-8+/+ mice (n=10). *P < 0.05 paired t-test.(c) 100 nM AMPA-evoked whole cell currents are reduced by ~38% inγ-8Δ4/Δ4 (n=8) compared toγ-8+/+ mice (n=7). Inset, AMPA-evoked current from representative cells are shown. Calibration: 1 min, 50 pA.(d) Extracellular recordings of field EPSPs before and after tetanic stimulation of Schaffer collaterals (arrow). LTP was elicited inγ-8+/+ (open squares; n=6),γ-8Δ4/Δ4 (gray squares; n=10) andγ-8+/Δ4 slices (light gray squares; n=9) to a similar degree, but attenuated inγ-8−/−slices (black triangles; n=4). Inset, averaged fEPSPs before (dark trace) and during LTP (light trace). Calibration: 10 ms, 0.5 mV (+/+), 0.45 mV (⊗4/⊗4), 0.38 (+/⊗4) and 0.5 mV (−/−).(e) Whole-cell recordings from CA1 pyramidal cells before and after a pairing protocol (arrow). LTP was induced in slices fromγ-8+/+ (n=5),γ-8+/Δ4 heterozygote (n=4) andγ-8Δ4/Δ4 homozygote mice (n=6). Inset, representative examples of averaged EPSCs recorded before and during LTP. Calibration: 20 ms, 200 pA (+/+), 160 pA (⊗4/ ⊗4) and 200 pA (+/⊗4). All data are given as mean ± s.e.m.; *P < 0.05.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jackson AC, Nicoll RA. The Expanding Social Network of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors: TARPs and Other Transmembrane Auxiliary Subunits. Neuron. 2011;70:178–199. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hashimoto K, et al. Impairment of AMPA receptor function in cerebellar granule cells of ataxic mutant mouse stargazer. J Neurosci. 1999;19:6027–6036. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rouach N, et al. TARP gamma-8 controls hippocampal AMPA receptor number, distribution and synaptic plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1525–1533. - PubMed
    1. Fukaya M, et al. Abundant distribution of TARP gamma-8 in synaptic and extrasynaptic surface of hippocampal neurons and its major role in AMPA receptor expression on spines and dendrites. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24:2177–2190. - PubMed
    1. Zamanillo D, et al. Importance of AMPA receptors for hippocampal synaptic plasticity but not for spatial learning. Science. 1999;284:1805–1811. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Nature Publishing Group full text link Nature Publishing Group Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp