DELINQUENCY AND THE STRUCTURE OF ADOLESCENT PEER GROUPS
- PMID:21572969
- PMCID: PMC3092163
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00219.x
DELINQUENCY AND THE STRUCTURE OF ADOLESCENT PEER GROUPS
Abstract
Gangs and group-level processes were once central phenomena for criminological theory and research. By the mid-1970's, however, gang research was primarily displaced by studies of individual behavior using randomized self-report surveys, a shift that also removed groups from the theoretical foreground. In this project, we return to the group level to test competing theoretical claims about delinquent group structure. We use network-based clustering methods to identify 897 friendship groups in two ninth grade cohorts of 27 Pennsylvania and Iowa schools. We then relate group-level measures of delinquency and drinking to network measures of group size, friendship reciprocity, transitivity, structural cohesion, stability, average popularity, and network centrality. We find significant negative correlations between group delinquency and all of our network measures, suggesting that delinquent groups are less solidary and less central to school networks than non-delinquent groups. Further analyses, however, reveal that these correlations are primarily explained by other group characteristics, such as gender composition and socioeconomic status. Drinking behaviors, on the other hand, show net positive associations with most of the network measures, suggesting that drinking groups have higher status and are more internally cohesive than non-drinking groups. Our findings shed light on a longstanding criminological debate by suggesting that any structural differences between delinquent and non-delinquent groups may be attributable to other attributes coincidental with delinquency. In contrast, drinking groups appear to provide peer contexts of greater social capital and cohesion.
Figures
Similar articles
- Reciprocal Associations between Delinquent Behavior and Social Network Position during Middle School.Andrews NCZ, Hanish LD, Santos CE.Andrews NCZ, et al.J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Sep;46(9):1918-1932. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0643-2. Epub 2017 Feb 23.J Youth Adolesc. 2017.PMID:28233142
- The etiology of female juvenile delinquency and gang membership: a test of psychological and social structural explanations.Bowker LH, Klein MW.Bowker LH, et al.Adolescence. 1983 Winter;18(72):739-51.Adolescence. 1983.PMID:6666701
- Youth gangs, delinquency and drug use: a test of the selection, facilitation, and enhancement hypotheses.Gatti U, Tremblay RE, Vitaro F, McDuff P.Gatti U, et al.J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;46(11):1178-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.00423.x.J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005.PMID:16238665
- Gender, Friendship Networks, and Delinquency: A Dynamic Network Approach.Haynie DL, Doogan NJ, Soller B.Haynie DL, et al.Criminology. 2014 Nov;52(4):688-722. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12052.Criminology. 2014.PMID:26097241Free PMC article.
- The relationship between peer, social, and school factors, and delinquency among youth.Paetsch JJ, Bertrand LD.Paetsch JJ, et al.J Sch Health. 1997 Jan;67(1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1997.tb06291.x.J Sch Health. 1997.PMID:8990042
Cited by
- Urban Poverty and Neighborhood Effects on Crime: Incorporating Spatial and Network Perspectives.Graif C, Gladfelter AS, Matthews SA.Graif C, et al.Sociol Compass. 2014 Sep;8(9):1140-1155. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12199. Epub 2014 Sep 16.Sociol Compass. 2014.PMID:27375773Free PMC article.
- Time with peers from middle childhood to late adolescence: developmental course and adjustment correlates.Lam CB, McHale SM, Crouter AC.Lam CB, et al.Child Dev. 2014 Jul-Aug;85(4):1677-93. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12235. Epub 2014 Feb 22.Child Dev. 2014.PMID:24673293Free PMC article.
- Youth with Co-occurring Delinquency and Depressive Symptoms: Do They Have Better or Worse Delinquent Outcomes?Siennick SE, Widdowson AO, Feinberg ME.Siennick SE, et al.J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Jun;49(6):1260-1276. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01213-1. Epub 2020 Feb 27.J Youth Adolesc. 2020.PMID:32108301Free PMC article.
- Friendship group position and substance use.Osgood DW, Feinberg ME, Wallace LN, Moody J.Osgood DW, et al.Addict Behav. 2014 May;39(5):923-33. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.12.009. Epub 2013 Dec 18.Addict Behav. 2014.PMID:24389068Free PMC article.Clinical Trial.
- Peer Influence, Friend Selection, and Gender: How Network Processes Shape Adolescent Smoking, Drinking, And Delinquency.McMillan C, Felmlee D, Osgood DW.McMillan C, et al.Soc Networks. 2018 Oct;55:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 26.Soc Networks. 2018.PMID:30923419Free PMC article.
References
- Akers Ronald L. Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction; 2009.
- Baerveldt Chris, Ronan Van Rossem, Marjolijn Vermande, Frank Weerman. Students' delinquency and correlates with strong and weaker ties: A study of students' networks in Dutch high schools. Connections. 2004;26:11–28.
- Bagwell Catherine L, Coie John D, Terry Robert A, Lochman John E. Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill Palmer Quarterly. 2000;46:280–305.
- Baron Reuben M, Kenny David A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. - PubMed
- Bonacich Phillip. Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology. 1987;92:1170–1182.
Related information
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources