Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2011 May 17;108(20):8339-44.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018959108. Epub 2011 May 2.

Resetting the evolution of marine reptiles at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary

Affiliations

Resetting the evolution of marine reptiles at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary

Philippa M Thorne et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A..

Abstract

Ichthyosaurs were important marine predators in the Early Jurassic, and an abundant and diverse component of Mesozoic marine ecosystems. Despite their ecological importance, however, the Early Jurassic species represent a reduced remnant of their former significance in the Triassic. Ichthyosaurs passed through an evolutionary bottleneck at, or close to, the Triassic-Jurassic boundary, which reduced their diversity to as few as three or four lineages. Diversity bounced back to some extent in the aftermath of the end-Triassic mass extinction, but disparity remained at less than one-tenth of pre-extinction levels, and never recovered. The group remained at low diversity and disparity for its final 100 Myr. The end-Triassic mass extinction had a previously unsuspected profound effect in resetting the evolution of apex marine predators of the Mesozoic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Phylogenetic tree of ichthyosaurs plotted against geological time. Times runs from left to right, showing known ranges (dark gray), ghost ranges (minimal implied phylogenetic gap; light gray), and Lazarus ranges (missing within-range representation; diagonal bars). Silhouette outlines (Ca.,Californosaurus;Ch.,Chaohusaurus;Mi.,Mixosaurus;Pl.,Platypterygius;Sh,Shonisaurus;Te.,Temnodontosaurus;Ut.,Utatsusaurus) indicate major body morphologies in Triassic (red), Early Jurassic (blue), and Middle Jurassic–Cretaceous (green). Relative sizes of the various major ichthyosaur morphotypes are indicated by scale drawings at top right, with a 1-m scale bar indicated in the blue cloud. Phylogeny is based on the majority-rule LE50 tree (SI Appendix, Fig. 3), similar to earlier findings (7, 13), and stratigraphic ranges are from a review of the literature (SI Appendix, Fig. 4). Ichthyosaur silhouettes are based on various sources (7).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Morphospace occupation by ichthyosaurs. Plots are based on the first two axes from the principal coordinates analysis for each dataset: (A) whole-body characters; (B) cranial characters; and (C) postcranial characters. Taxa from the four time bins are distinguished by symbols, and minimal morphospace occupations by ichthyosaurs of each time bin are indicated by polygon outlines, differently colored for each time bin (red, Early–Middle Triassic; black, Late Triassic; blue, Early Jurassic; green, Middle Jurassic–Cretaceous).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Disparity and diversity of ichthyosaurs through the Triassic and Jurassic. The global disparity values are based on the sum-of-ranges metric, and diversity is the number of species. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals. (A) Disparity change is shown for all characters, cranial characters, and postcranial characters. (B) All-character disparity compared with genus-level diversity change, showing plots for study genera (those included in the disparity study) and for all genera (addition of incompletely known taxa that were excluded from the disparity study but are close relatives of included taxa). The Tr-J boundary is marked by a heavy dashed vertical line.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Motani R. The evolution of marine reptiles. Evol Educ Outreach. 2009;2:224–235.
    1. Benson RBJ, Butler RJ, Lindgren J, Smith AS. Mesozoic marine tetrapod diversity: Mass extinctions and temporal heterogeneity in geological megabiases affecting vertebrates. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci. 2010;277:829–834. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deenen MHL, et al. A new chronology for the end-Triassic mass extinction. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2010;291:113–125.
    1. Hallam A. How catastrophic was the end-Triassic mass extinction? Lethaia. 2002;35:147–157.
    1. Tanner LH, Lucas SG, Chapman MG. Assessing the record and causes of Late Triassic extinctions. Earth Sci Rev. 2004;65:103–139.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp