Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Review
.2011 Apr;11(4):312-21.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70224-3.

Hygiene: new hopes, new horizons

Affiliations
Review

Hygiene: new hopes, new horizons

Val Curtis et al. Lancet Infect Dis.2011 Apr.

Abstract

Although promotion of safe hygiene is the single most cost-effective means of preventing infectious disease, investment in hygiene is low both in the health and in the water and sanitation sectors. Evidence shows the benefit of improved hygiene, especially for improved handwashing and safe stool disposal. A growing understanding of what drives hygiene behaviour and creative partnerships are providing fresh approaches to change behaviour. However, some important gaps in our knowledge exist. For example, almost no trials of the effectiveness of interventions to improve food hygiene in developing countries are available. We also need to figure out how best to make safe hygiene practices matters of daily routine that are sustained by social norms on a mass scale. Full and active involvement of the health sector in getting safe hygiene to all homes, schools, and institutions will bring major gains to public health.

Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Hypotheses about the most effective ways of changing handwashing behaviour
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Why doesn't hand hygiene work better?
    Sepkowitz KA.Sepkowitz KA.Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Feb;12(2):96-7. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70349-8.Lancet Infect Dis. 2012.PMID:22281133No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Jamieson D, Bremen J, Measham A, Alleyne G, Claeson M. Disease control priorities in developing countries. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2006. - PubMed
    1. Cairncross S, Valdmanis V. Water supply, sanitation and hygiene promotion. In: Jamison D, Breman J, Measham A, editors. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd edn. The World Bank; Washington, DC: 2006. pp. 771–792.
    1. Curtis VA, Cairncross S, Yonli R. Domestic hygiene and diarrhoea, pinpointing the problem. Trop Med Int Health. 2000;5:22–32. - PubMed
    1. Haas C, Rose J, Gerba C, editors. Quantitative microbial risk assessment. John Wiley and Sons; San Francisco: 1999.
    1. Ehiri JE, Azubuike MC, Ubbaonu CN, Anyanwu EC, Ibe KM, Ogbonna MO. Critical control points of complementary food preparation and handling in eastern Nigeria. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:423–433. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp