Mental rotation does not account for sex differences in left-right confusion
- PMID:21345568
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.01.010
Mental rotation does not account for sex differences in left-right confusion
Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated that women believe they are more prone to left-right confusion (LRC) than men. However, while some studies report that there is also a sex difference in LRC tasks favouring men, others report that men and women perform equally well. Recently, it was suggested that sex differences only emerge in LRC tasks when they involve mental rotation. That is, sex differences that are reported for some LRC tasks are strongly affected by the well-documented male advantage in mental rotation. To test this assumption, 91 participants were investigated on two LRC tasks: The Left-Right Commands Task and the Bergen Left-Right Discrimination Test. Additionally, participants were asked to complete an LRC self-rating questionnaire. To rule out the possibility that sex differences in LRC are confounded by sex differences in mental rotation, male and female participants were matched for mental rotation performance, resulting in a sample of 46 matched participants. These matched participants showed robust sex differences in favour of men in all LRC measurements. This suggests that pronounced sex differences in LRC are a genuine phenomenon that exists independently of sex differences in mental rotation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
- Sex differences in left-right confusion depend on hemispheric asymmetry.Hirnstein M, Ocklenburg S, Schneider D, Hausmann M.Hirnstein M, et al.Cortex. 2009 Jul-Aug;45(7):891-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.11.009. Epub 2008 Nov 21.Cortex. 2009.PMID:19100970
- Dichotic listening and left-right confusion.Hirnstein M.Hirnstein M.Brain Cogn. 2011 Jul;76(2):239-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Mar 12.Brain Cogn. 2011.PMID:21398014
- Sex differences in spatial ability: a lateralization of function approach.Rilea SL, Roskos-Ewoldsen B, Boles D.Rilea SL, et al.Brain Cogn. 2004 Dec;56(3):332-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.09.002.Brain Cogn. 2004.PMID:15522772Clinical Trial.
- Applications of mental rotation figures of the Shepard and Metzler type and description of a mental rotation stimulus library.Peters M, Battista C.Peters M, et al.Brain Cogn. 2008 Apr;66(3):260-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.09.003. Epub 2007 Oct 29.Brain Cogn. 2008.PMID:17967499Review.
- Sex differences in spatial cognition: advancing the conversation.Levine SC, Foley A, Lourenco S, Ehrlich S, Ratliff K.Levine SC, et al.Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2016 Mar-Apr;7(2):127-55. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1380. Epub 2016 Jan 29.Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2016.PMID:26825049Review.
Cited by
- The Impact of Handedness, Sex, and Cognitive Abilities on Left-Right Discrimination: A Behavioral Study.Constant M, Mellet E.Constant M, et al.Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 27;9:405. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00405. eCollection 2018.Front Psychol. 2018.PMID:29636718Free PMC article.
- The Bergen left-right discrimination test: practice effects, reliable change indices, and strategic performance in the standard and alternate form with inverted stimuli.Grewe P, Ohmann HA, Markowitsch HJ, Piefke M.Grewe P, et al.Cogn Process. 2014 May;15(2):159-72. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0587-8. Epub 2013 Oct 31.Cogn Process. 2014.PMID:24174271
- 'WhenRight could be so Wrong'. Laterality Errors in Healthcare.Gormley GJ, Dempster M, Corry R, Brennan C.Gormley GJ, et al.Ulster Med J. 2018 Jan;87(1):3-10. Epub 2018 Jan 31.Ulster Med J. 2018.PMID:29588549Free PMC article.Review.No abstract available.
- Evaluation of Central Auditory Processing of Azeri-Persian Bilinguals Using Dichotic Listening Tasks in First and Second Languages.Fattahi J, Tahaei AA, Ashayeri H, Mohammadkhani G, Jalaie S.Fattahi J, et al.Iran J Child Neurol. 2019 Winter;13(1):79-90.Iran J Child Neurol. 2019.PMID:30598676Free PMC article.
- Visual and Verbal Processes in Right-Left Confusion: Psychometric and Experimental Approaches.Tagami U, Imaizumi S.Tagami U, et al.Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 10;12:753532. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753532. eCollection 2021.Front Psychol. 2021.PMID:34858281Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources