Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Public Library of Science full text link Public Library of Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Review
.2011 Jan 31;6(1):e14631.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014631.

Marine biodiversity in the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of South America: knowledge and gaps

Affiliations
Review

Marine biodiversity in the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of South America: knowledge and gaps

Patricia Miloslavich et al. PLoS One..

Abstract

The marine areas of South America (SA) include almost 30,000 km of coastline and encompass three different oceanic domains--the Caribbean, the Pacific, and the Atlantic--ranging in latitude from 12∘N to 55∘S. The 10 countries that border these coasts have different research capabilities and taxonomic traditions that affect taxonomic knowledge. This paper analyzes the status of knowledge of marine biodiversity in five subregions along the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of South America (SA): the Tropical East Pacific, the Humboldt Current,the Patagonian Shelf, the Brazilian Shelves, and the Tropical West Atlantic, and it provides a review of ecosystem threats and regional marine conservation strategies. South American marine biodiversity is least well known in the tropical subregions (with the exception of Costa Rica and Panama). Differences in total biodiversity were observed between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans at the same latitude. In the north of the continent, the Tropical East Pacific is richer in species than the Tropical West Atlantic, however, when standardized by coastal length, there is very little difference among them. In the south, the Humboldt Current system is much richer than the Patagonian Shelf. An analysis of endemism shows that 75% of the species are reported within only one of the SA regions, while about 22% of the species of SA are not reported elsewhere in the world. National and regional initiatives focusing on new exploration, especially to unknown areas and ecosystems, as well as collaboration among countries are fundamental to achieving the goal of completing inventories of species diversity and distribution.These inventories will allow accurate interpretation of the biogeography of its two oceanic coasts and latitudinal trends,and will also provide relevant information for science based policies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests:The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Map of South America defining the five subregions as analyzed in this paper: Tropical East Pacific (blue), Humboldt Current system (light purple), Tropical West Atlantic (orange), Brazilian shelves (light blue), and Patagonian Shelf (pink).
[The Caribbean subregion (yellow) is subject of another articlewithin this collection . Bathymetryscale in meters.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Map showing currents and bathymetry around the South American continent.
Bathymetry scale in meters.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Map showing the sea surface temperature (SST) around the South American continent.
A: Austral winter, B: Austral summer.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Map showing primary production measured as chlorophyll a (Chl a) around the South American continent.
A: Austral winter, B: Austral summer.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Species richness in the Humboldt Current subregion.
Scale represents number of species.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Map of the Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) of Brazil.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Number of species per 100 km of coast for the major taxonomic groups (macroalgae, cnidarians, mollusks, crustaceans, echinoderms, and fishes) for the five South American subregions studied.
Figure 8
Figure 8. Number of species in the OBIS database versus the number of species in the present review.
A: Total number of species. B: Species per 100 km of coast. The largestthe length of the dashed line (deviation from the diagonal), the largestthe difference between the two datasets (OBIS and the presentreview).
Figure 9
Figure 9. Map showing the distribution of marine biodiversity around the South American continent using data from the OBIS database.
Richness scale represents number of species. Bathymetry scale inmeters.
Figure 10
Figure 10. Expected species richness in the Humboldt Current subregion using the rarefaction technique to estimate the number of species that would have been observed given a standard number of 10 observations.
Scale represents expected number of species.
Figure 11
Figure 11. Species description in South America.
A: Number of species described per year for all taxonomic groups. B:Species-description accumulation curves for marine species takinginto account all taxonomic groups. Period: 1750–2000. Datafrom OBIS database (using only “valid names” whichcorrects for synonyms).
Figure 12
Figure 12. Species-description accumulation curves for South American marine species by taxonomic group (macroalgae, cnidarians, mollusks, crustaceans, echinoderms, and fishes).
Data from OBIS database (using only “valid names” whichcorrects for synonyms).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cruz M, Gabor N, Mora E, Jiménez R, Mair J. The known and unknown about marine biodiversity in Ecuador (continental and insular). Gayana. 2003;67:232–260.
    1. Díaz JM, Acero A. Marine biodiversity in Colombia: achievements, status of knowledge, and challenges. Gayana. 2003;67:261–274.
    1. Tarazona J, Gutiérrez D, Paredes C, Indacochea A. Overview and challenges of marine biodiversity research in Peru. Gayana. 2003;67:206–231.
    1. Fernandez-Baca J, Miethke S, Reichle S, Armijo E, Ferdaña Z, et al. Coastal and marine conservation priorities in Peru. In: Chatwin A, editor. Priorities for coastal and marine conservation in South America. Arlington, Virginia: The Nature Conservancy; 2007. pp. 44–47.
    1. Miethke S, Reichle S, Armijo E, Ferdaña Z, Sotomayor L, et al. Coastal and marine conservation priorities in Chile. In: Chatwin A, editor. Priorities for coastal and marine conservation in South America. Arlington: The Nature Conservancy; 2007. pp. 24–29.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Public Library of Science full text link Public Library of Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp