Medical regulation, spectacular transparency and the blame business
- PMID:21155435
- DOI: 10.1108/14777261011088683
Medical regulation, spectacular transparency and the blame business
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore general practitioners' (GPs') and psychiatrists' views and experiences of transparent forms of medical regulation in practice, as well as those of medical regulators and those representing patients and professionals.
Design/methodology/approach: The research included interviews with GPs, psychiatrists and others involved in medical regulation, representing patients and professionals. A qualitative narrative analysis of the interviews was then conducted.
Findings: Narratives suggest rising levels of complaints, legalisation and blame within the National Health Service (NHS). Three key themes emerge. First, doctors feel "guilty until proven innocent" within increasingly legalised regulatory systems and are consequently practising more defensively. Second, regulation is described as providing "spectacular transparency", driven by political responses to high profile scandals rather than its effects in practice, which can be seen as a social defence. Finally, it is suggested that a "blame business" is driving this form of transparency, in which self-interested regulators, the media, lawyers, and even some patient organisations are fuelling transparency in a wider culture of blame.
Research limitations/implications: A relatively small number of people were interviewed, so further research testing the findings would be useful.
Practical implications: Transparency has some perverse effects on doctors' practice.
Social implications: Rising levels of blame has perverse consequences for patient care, as doctors are practicing more defensively as a result, as well as significant financial implications for NHS funding.
Originality/value: Transparent forms of regulation are assumed to be beneficial and yet little research has examined its effects in practice. In this paper we highlight a number of perverse effects of transparency in practice.
Similar articles
- Reactivity and reactions to regulatory transparency in medicine, psychotherapy and counselling.McGivern G, Fischer MD.McGivern G, et al.Soc Sci Med. 2012 Feb;74(3):289-296. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.035. Epub 2011 Nov 6.Soc Sci Med. 2012.PMID:22104085
- Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.Bekkering GE, et al.Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.Eur J Health Econ. 2008.PMID:18987905
- [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.Bekkering GE, et al.Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008.PMID:19034813German.
- Risky behaviour and patient safety: a critical culturist perspective.Linsley P, Mannion R.Linsley P, et al.J Health Organ Manag. 2009;23(5):494-504. doi: 10.1108/14777260910983998.J Health Organ Manag. 2009.PMID:19862878
- Perceptions of the impact of primary care organizations on GP prescribing: the iron fist in the velvet glove?Prosser H, Walley T.Prosser H, et al.J Health Organ Manag. 2007;21(1):5-26. doi: 10.1108/14777260710732231.J Health Organ Manag. 2007.PMID:17455809
Cited by
- Understanding healthcare professionals' responses to patient complaints in secondary and tertiary care in the UK: A systematic review and behavioural analysis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.Antonopoulou V, Meyer C, Chadwick P, Gibson B, Sniehotta FF, Vlaev I, Vassova A, Goffe L, Lorencatto F, McKinlay A, Chater AM.Antonopoulou V, et al.Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Oct 1;22(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01209-4.Health Res Policy Syst. 2024.PMID:39354470Free PMC article.
- Experiences of Physicians Investigated for Professionalism Concerns: a Narrative Review.Im DS, Tamarelli CM, Shen MR.Im DS, et al.J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(2):283-300. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08550-4. Epub 2023 Dec 5.J Gen Intern Med. 2024.PMID:38051480Free PMC article.Review.
- Reforming regulatory relationships: The impact of medical revalidation on doctors, employers, and the General Medical Council in the United Kingdom.Tazzyman A, Bryce M, Ferguson J, Walshe K, Boyd A, Price T, Tredinnick-Rowe J.Tazzyman A, et al.Regul Gov. 2019 Dec;13(4):593-608. doi: 10.1111/rego.12237. Epub 2019 Jan 9.Regul Gov. 2019.PMID:32684944Free PMC article.
- 'You feel you've been bad, not ill': Sick doctors' experiences of interactions with the General Medical Council.Brooks SK, Del Busso L, Chalder T, Harvey SB, Hatch SL, Hotopf M, Madan I, Henderson M.Brooks SK, et al.BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 17;4(7):e005537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005537.BMJ Open. 2014.PMID:25034631Free PMC article.
- Professional autonomy and surveillance: the case of public reporting in cardiac surgery.Exworthy M, Gabe J, Jones IR, Smith G.Exworthy M, et al.Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Jul;41(6):1040-1055. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12883. Epub 2019 Mar 15.Sociol Health Illn. 2019.PMID:30874329Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials