Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Public Library of Science full text link Public Library of Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Comparative Study
.2010 Nov 15;5(11):e13982.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013982.

On the size and flight diversity of giant pterosaurs, the use of birds as pterosaur analogues and comments on pterosaur flightlessness

Affiliations
Comparative Study

On the size and flight diversity of giant pterosaurs, the use of birds as pterosaur analogues and comments on pterosaur flightlessness

Mark P Witton et al. PLoS One..

Abstract

The size and flight mechanics of giant pterosaurs have received considerable research interest for the last century but are confused by conflicting interpretations of pterosaur biology and flight capabilities. Avian biomechanical parameters have often been applied to pterosaurs in such research but, due to considerable differences in avian and pterosaur anatomy, have lead to systematic errors interpreting pterosaur flight mechanics. Such assumptions have lead to assertions that giant pterosaurs were extremely lightweight to facilitate flight or, if more realistic masses are assumed, were flightless. Reappraisal of the proportions, scaling and morphology of giant pterosaur fossils suggests that bird and pterosaur wing structure, gross anatomy and launch kinematics are too different to be considered mechanically interchangeable. Conclusions assuming such interchangeability--including those indicating that giant pterosaurs were flightless--are found to be based on inaccurate and poorly supported assumptions of structural scaling and launch kinematics. Pterosaur bone strength and flap-gliding performance demonstrate that giant pterosaur anatomy was capable of generating sufficient lift and thrust for powered flight as well as resisting flight loading stresses. The retention of flight characteristics across giant pterosaur skeletons and their considerable robustness compared to similarly-massed terrestrial animals suggest that giant pterosaurs were not flightless. Moreover, the term 'giant pterosaur' includes at least two radically different forms with very distinct palaeoecological signatures and, accordingly, all but the most basic sweeping conclusions about giant pterosaur flight should be treated with caution. Reappraisal of giant pterosaur material also reveals that the size of the largest pterosaurs, previously suggested to have wingspans up to 13 m and masses up to 544 kg, have been overestimated. Scaling of fragmentary giant pterosaur remains have been misled by distorted fossils or used inappropriate scaling techniques, indicating that 10-11 m wingspans and masses of 200-250 kg are the most reliable upper estimates of known pterosaur size.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests:The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Azhdarchid humeri.
A, leftHatzegopteryx humerus in ventral view; B, distal view; C, rightQuetzalcoatlus sp. humerus in proximal view. Note the distorted diaphysis of theHatzegopteryx humerus compared to the undistorted profile ofQuetzalcoatlus sp.. C, from Padian and Smith . Scale bar represents 100 mm.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pterosaur and soaring bird wing ecomorphospace compared using principal component analyses from Norberg and Rayner and Rayner .
Blue shading, wing ecomorphospace of modern birds (from [64]); grey shading, modern bats (from [63]); orange shading; dynamically-soaring birds (tropic birds, petrels, albatrosses); purple shading, statically-soaring birds (condors, vultures, storks; cranes); purple dashed line, extent of pterosaur wing ecomorphology found in Witton ; blue dashed line, pterosaur wing ecomorphology of Brower and Venius ; green dashed line, broad-winged pterosaur wing ecomorphology of Hazlehurst and Rayner ; red dashed line, pterosaur wing ecomorphology of Chatterjee and Templin .
Figure 3
Figure 3. Dorsal views of giant and tiny pterosaur humeri.
A,Quetzalcoatlus northropi (10–11 m wingspan); B,Pteranodon (7 m wingspan); C,Pterodactylus (45 cm wingspan). Note that each bears a large deltopectoral crest (dp) and robust extremities. Scale bars represent 100 mm (A and B) and 10 mm (C). A and C, from Wittonet al.; B, modified from Bennett .
Figure 4
Figure 4. Albatross, azhdarchid and pteranodontian skeletons compared.
A, wandering albatross,Diomedea exulans; B, the azhdarchidHatzegopteryx; C, the pteranodontianPteranodon; D, functional wing region dimensions compared across a standard wing length. A, based on Paul ; B, based on Buffetautet al.–, Kellner and Langston , Cai and Wei and Pereda Suberbiola ; C, based on Bennett ; D, functional regions taken from Prondvai and Hone . Images not to scale.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Lateral view of the forelimb musculature inAnhanguera santanae.
Note that the forelimb musculature is extensive, and that the major muscle base used for flight is more distributed than that of birds. Unlike avian taxa, pterosaurs derived substantial flapping power from several groups of muscles around the chest and back (rather than the two primary muscles in birds), as well as the antebrachium and manus. Illustration by Julia Molnar, used with permission.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Skeletal reconstruction of a quadrupedally launchingPteranodon.
Skeletal proportions based on Bennett ; kinematics from Habib .
Figure 7
Figure 7. Soaring animal planforms compared.
A, wandering albatrossDiomedea exulans; B, the giant ornithocheiroidPteranodon; the giant azhdarchidQuetzalcoatlus; D, shown to scale. See for details of pterosaur wing planform reconstruction.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bennett SC. The phylogenetic position of the Pterosauria within the Archosauromorpha. Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society. 1996;118:261–308.
    1. Benton MJ. Scleromochlus taylori and the origin of dinosaurs and pterosaurs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B. 1999;354:1423–1446.
    1. Hone DWE, Benton MJ. Contrasting supertrees and total-evidence methods: pterosaur origins. Zitteliana. 2008;B28:35–60.
    1. Brown B. Flying reptiles. Natural History. 1943;52:104–111.
    1. Wellnhofer P. Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie. Teil 19: Pterosauria. 1978. 82 Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Public Library of Science full text link Public Library of Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp