Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2010:54:127-36.

Real World Data Driven Evolution of Volvo Cars' Side Impact Protection Systems and their Effectiveness

Affiliations

Real World Data Driven Evolution of Volvo Cars' Side Impact Protection Systems and their Effectiveness

Lotta Jakobsson et al. Ann Adv Automot Med.2010.

Abstract

This study analyses the outcome of the continuous improved occupant protection over the last two decades for front seat near side occupants in side impacts based on a real world driven working process. The effectiveness of four generations of improved side impact protection are calculated based on data from Volvo's statistical accident database of Volvo Cars in Sweden. Generation I includes vehicles with a new structural and interior concept (SIPS). Generation II includes vehicles with structural improvements and a new chest airbag (SIPSbag). Generation III includes vehicles with further improved SIPS and SIPSbag as well as the new concept with a head protecting Inflatable Curtain (IC). Generation IV includes the most recent vehicles with further improvements of all the systems plus advanced sensors and seat belt pretensioner activation. Compared to baseline vehicles, vehicles of generation I reduce MAIS2+ injuries by 54%, generation II by 61% and generation III by 72%. For generation IV effectiveness figures cannot be calculated because of the lack of MAIS2+ injuries. A continuous improved performance is also seen when studying the AIS2+ pelvis, abdomen, chest and head injuries separately. By using the same real world driven working process, future improvements and possibly new passive as well as active safety systems, will be developed with the aim of further improved protection to near side occupants in side impacts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure. 1
Figure. 1
Real world driven working process
Figure. 2
Figure. 2
Distribution of collision objects for the four vehicle subsets.
Figure. 3
Figure. 3
MAIS2+ injury rates (including 95%-ile confidence intervals) for four generations of side impact protection vehicle groups and baseline vehicles. Chi-square statistics and p-values in appendix B.
Figure. 4
Figure. 4
AIS2+ pelvis injury rates (including 95%-ile confidence intervals) for the baseline and the generation III vehicles. Chi-square statistics and p-values in appendix C.
Figure. 5
Figure. 5
AIS2+ abdominal injury rates (incl. 95%-ile confidence intervals) for the baseline and the generation III vehicles. Chi-square statistics and p-values in appendix C.
Figure. 6
Figure. 6
AIS2+ chest injury rates (including 95%-ile confidence intervals) for the baseline and the generation III vehicles. Chi-square statistics and p-values in appendix C.
Figure. 7
Figure. 7
AIS2+ head injury rates (including 95%-ile confidence intervals) for the baseline and the generation III vehicles. Chi-square statistics and p-values in appendix C.
Figure. 8
Figure. 8
AIS3+ chest injury rates (including 95%-ile confidence intervals) for the baseline and the generation I vehicles. Chi-square statistics and p-values in appendix D.
Figure. 9
Figure. 9
AIS3+ chest injury rates (including 95%-ile confidence intervals) for the baseline and the generation II vehicles. Chi-square statistics and p-values in appendix D.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM) Des Plaines IL, USA: 1985. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1985 Revision.
    1. Almqvist R, Mellander H, Koch M. Frontal Crash Protection in a Modern car Concept. The 9th International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; Kyoto, Japan. 1982.
    1. Bakker J, Herrmann R. Systematik zur Ermittlung der Wirksamkeit von Fahrzeugsicherheitsmassnahmen auf der Grundlage von deutschen Unfalldaten- banken. Innovativer Kfz – Insassen – und Partnerschutz VDI – Gesellschaft Fahrzeug- und Verkehrstechnik; Germany. September 2001.
    1. Bauer P, Lange W. Comparison of Real World Side Impact/Rollover Collisions with and without Thorax Bags – First Field Experience Study. 44th AAAM Conference; Chicago, USA. 2000. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brännström M, Coelingh E, Sjöberg J. Model-Based Threat Assessment for Avoiding Arbitrary Vehicle Collision. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2010;11(3)

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp