Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Comparative Study
.2011 Jan;171(1):111-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

Evaluation of the Virus Counter® for rapid baculovirus quantitation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of the Virus Counter® for rapid baculovirus quantitation

Matthew M Ferris et al. J Virol Methods.2011 Jan.

Abstract

The utility of a new instrument for rapid virus quantitation, the Virus Counter, was evaluated in a blind study conducted at three sites. This instrument is a substantially improved version of the original academic research instrument described previously by Stoffel and Rowlen (2005a). The addition of hydrodynamic focusing, a self-contained fluidics system and customized software for system control and data analysis has resulted in a commercially viable and available design. Baculovirus samples were provided by Protein Sciences Corporation and blinded to InDevR and Baylor College of Medicine. Protein Sciences Corporation and Baylor College of Medicine analyzed the samples by plaque assay and InDevR analyzed the samples using the Virus Counter. Serial dilution of stock viruses into growth media and buffer allowed for comparison of measured versus intended concentrations. Direct log-scale comparison between pooled Virus Counter results and pooled plaque assay results indicated a linear relationship (slope=1.1±0.2, R(2)=0.86) with statistically significant Pearson correlation (r=0.93, p<0.001).

Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

InDevR, Inc. is a for-profit entity and four of the eleven authors are employees of the company.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of log-scale assay results for samples diluted in PSFM
Data points represent the mean measured result of samples 1a–7a with error bars representing ±1σ from the mean. Within the Virus Counter data set (triangles), the lowest three values are shown as unfilled triangles to indicate that these values were below the SQL determined for PSFM and were not included in the linear regression fit to the data. Coefficients of determination (R2) for linear regression fits to the data were 0.81 for Protein Sciences Corporation (diamonds with a dashed line), 0.97 for Baylor College of Medicine (squares with a dot-dash line) and 1.0 for InDevR (triangles with a solid line). Slopes of the regression fits were 1.1 ± 0.2 for Protein Sciences Corporation, 0.81 ± 0.07 for Baylor College of Medicine and 1.2 ± 0.1 for InDevR. Pearson correlation coefficients for the Virus Counter, Protein Sciences Corporation and Baylor College of Medicine were r = 0.94 (p < 0.01), r = 0.90 (p < 0.01) and r = 0.99 (p < 0.001), respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of log-scale assay results for samples diluted in SDB
Data points represent the mean measured result of samples 1b–7b with error bars representing ±1σ from the mean. Within the Virus Counter data set (triangles), results for samples 5b and 6b are shown as unfilled triangles to indicate that these values were below the SQL determined for SDB and were not included in the linear regression fit to the data. Sample 7b returned a zero count and is not included in the figure or the regression fit to the data. Coefficients of determination (R2) for the linear regressions fits to the data were 0.85 for Protein Sciences Corporation (diamonds with a dashed line), 0.82 for Baylor College of Medicine (squares with a dot-dash line) and 1.0 for InDevR (triangles with a solid line). Slopes of the regression fits were 0.5 ± 0.1 for Protein Sciences Corporation, 1.0 ± 0.3 for Baylor College of Medicine and 1.32 ± 0.04 for InDevR. Pearson correlation coefficients for the Virus Counter, Protein Sciences Corporation and Baylor College of Medicine were r = 1 (p < 0.001), r = 0.92 (p < 0.01) and r = 0.90 (p < 0.05), respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3. A log-scale correlation of Virus Counter and plaque assay results
Mean results for all samples above SQL (i.e. both PSFM and SDB) are shown. Mean plaque assay results are the combined results from Baylor College of Medicine and Protein Sciences Corporation. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. The solid line represents a linear regression fit to the data and was obtained with a coefficient of dertermination (R2) of 0.86 and a slope of 1.1 ± 0.2. The Pearson correlation coefficient was determined to be 0.93 (p < 0.001).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Borsheim KY, Bratbak G, Heldal M. Enumeration and biomass estimation of planktonic bacteria and viruses by transmission electron microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990;56:352–356. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox MMJ. Cell-based protein vaccines for influenza. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 2005;7:24–29. - PubMed
    1. Cox MMJ. Progress on baculovirus-derived influenza vaccines. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2008;10:56–61. - PubMed
    1. Darling AJ, Boose JA, Spaltro J. Virus assay methods: accuracy and validation. Biologicals. 1998;26:105–110. - PubMed
    1. Dutton G. In-line analytics improve manufacturing. Gen. Eng. Biotech. News. 2008;28:1–4.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp