Female genital injuries resulting from consensual and non-consensual vaginal intercourse
- PMID:20570068
- DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.04.049
Female genital injuries resulting from consensual and non-consensual vaginal intercourse
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of genital injury following penile-vaginal penetration with and without consent.
Design: This study compared observations of genital injuries from two cohorts.
Setting: Participants were drawn from St. Mary's Sexual Assault Referral Centre and a general practice surgery in Manchester, and a general practice surgery in Buckinghamshire.
Participants: Two cohorts were recruited: a retrospective cohort of 500 complainants referred to a specialist Sexual Assault Referral Centre (the Cases) and 68 women recruited at the time of their routine cervical smear test who had recently had sexual intercourse (the Comparison group).
Main outcome measures: Presence of genital injuries.
Results: 22.8% (n=00, 95% CI 19.2-26.7) of adult complainants of penile-vaginal rape by a single assailant sustained an injury to the genitalia that was visible within 48h of the incident. This was approximately three times more than the 5.9% (n=68, 95% CI 1.6-14.4) of women who sustained a genital injury during consensual sex. This was a statistically significant difference (a<0.05, p=0.0007). Factors such as hormonal status, position during intercourse, criminal justice outcome, relationship to assailant, and the locations, sizes and types of injuries were also considered but the only factor associated with injury was the relationship with the complainant, with an increased risk of injury if the assailant was known to the complainant (p=0.019).
Conclusions: Most complainants of rape (n=500, 77%, 95% CI 73-81%) will not sustain any genital injury, although women are three times more likely to sustain a genital injury from an assault than consensual intercourse.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
- A response to: Macroscopically detected female genital injury after consensual and non-consensual vaginal penetration: a prospective comparison study [20 (2013) 884-901].Lo MK, Foley C, Healy C, Oliphant J, Kent S.Lo MK, et al.J Forensic Leg Med. 2014 Nov;28:47-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Aug 20.J Forensic Leg Med. 2014.PMID:25440148No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Macroscopically detected female genital injury after consensual and non-consensual vaginal penetration: a prospective comparison study.Lincoln C, Perera R, Jacobs I, Ward A.Lincoln C, et al.J Forensic Leg Med. 2013 Oct;20(7):884-901. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.06.025. Epub 2013 Aug 15.J Forensic Leg Med. 2013.PMID:24112341
- Adolescent complainants of sexual assault; injury patterns in virgin and non-virgin groups.White C, McLean I.White C, et al.J Clin Forensic Med. 2006 May;13(4):172-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcfm.2006.02.006. Epub 2006 Mar 27.J Clin Forensic Med. 2006.PMID:16564196
- Genital injuries following sexual assault of women with and without prior sexual intercourse experience.Biggs M, Stermac LE, Divinsky M.Biggs M, et al.CMAJ. 1998 Jul 14;159(1):33-7.CMAJ. 1998.PMID:9679484Free PMC article.
- Genital injuries in postmenopausal women after sexual assault.Poulos CA, Sheridan DJ.Poulos CA, et al.J Elder Abuse Negl. 2008;20(4):323-35. doi: 10.1080/08946560802359243.J Elder Abuse Negl. 2008.PMID:19042660Review.
- Post-coital genital injury in healthy women: A review.Schmidt Astrup B, Lykkebo AW.Schmidt Astrup B, et al.Clin Anat. 2015 Apr;28(3):331-8. doi: 10.1002/ca.22476. Epub 2014 Oct 23.Clin Anat. 2015.PMID:25346095Review.
Cited by
- The Prevalence of Sexual Violence among Female Refugees in Complex Humanitarian Emergencies: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Vu A, Adam A, Wirtz A, Pham K, Rubenstein L, Glass N, Beyrer C, Singh S.Vu A, et al.PLoS Curr. 2014 Mar 18;6:ecurrents.dis.835f10778fd80ae031aac12d3b533ca7. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.835f10778fd80ae031aac12d3b533ca7.PLoS Curr. 2014.PMID:24818066Free PMC article.
- Intimate Partner Violence and Completion of Post-Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examination Follow-Up Screening.Gilmore AK, Jaffe AE, Hahn CK, Ridings LE, Gill-Hopple K, Lazenby GB, Flanagan JC.Gilmore AK, et al.J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jul;36(13-14):5991-6004. doi: 10.1177/0886260518817022. Epub 2018 Dec 10.J Interpers Violence. 2021.PMID:34121495Free PMC article.
- The prevalence of genital injuries in post-pubertal females presenting for forensic examination after reported sexual violence: a systematic review.Kane D, Kennedy KM, Eogan M.Kane D, et al.Int J Legal Med. 2024 May;138(3):997-1010. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03117-8. Epub 2023 Nov 16.Int J Legal Med. 2024.PMID:37971512Review.
- Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Features, Treatment and Outcome of Coital Injuries of the Female Genital Tract Consecutive to Consensual Sexual Intercourse in the Limbe Regional Hospital.Tchounzou R, Chichom-Mefire A.Tchounzou R, et al.Sex Med. 2015 Oct 7;3(4):256-60. doi: 10.1002/sm2.94. eCollection 2015 Dec.Sex Med. 2015.PMID:26797059Free PMC article.
- Comparison of Injury Patterns in Consensual and Nonconsensual Sex: Is It Possible to Determine if Consent was Given?Song SH, Fernandes JR.Song SH, et al.Acad Forensic Pathol. 2017 Dec;7(4):619-631. doi: 10.23907/2017.052. Epub 2017 Dec 1.Acad Forensic Pathol. 2017.PMID:31240011Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources