Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Springer full text link Springer
Full text links

Actions

Share

Randomized Controlled Trial
.2011 Feb;213(2-3):639-46.
doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1822-y. Epub 2010 Mar 26.

Efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus citalopram in major depressive disorder: a 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose study

Jian-Jun Ou et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl).2011 Feb.

Abstract

Rationale: S-citalopram (escitalopram) is the very active moiety of citalopram. It has been shown in many studies to be an effective and safe antidepressant for treating major depressive disorder (MDD).

Objective: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of escitalopram vs citalopram in Chinese MDD patients.

Methods: In the double-blind study, 240 MDD patients were randomly assigned to treatment for 6 weeks either with escitalopram (10-20 mg/d) or citalopram (20-40 mg/d). The primary efficacy measurement was the change of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) total score from baseline to the end of study. The secondary efficacy measurements were response and remission rates. The adverse events (AEs) were recorded by the investigator.

Results: Two hundred and three (85%) patients completed the trial. The average dose was 13.9 mg/d in the escitalopram group and 27.6 mg/d in the citalopram group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in the change in HAMD-17 total score, response, and remission rate. These results were similar in severe MDD patients. No significant differences were found between the two groups in AEs. No serious AEs were observed in this study.

Conclusions: The study suggests that escitalopram 10-20 mg/d are as effective and safe as citalopram 20-40 mg/d in the short-term treatment for Chinese MDD patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;65(1):44-9 - PubMed
    1. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2007 Mar;40(2):53-7 - PubMed
    1. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Mar;21(2):105-10 - PubMed
    1. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Apr-Jun;18(2):83-9 - PubMed
    1. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 May;21(3):159-69 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Springer full text link Springer
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp