Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: a review of the benefits and potential risks
- PMID:20049198
- PMCID: PMC2799454
- DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0900793
Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: a review of the benefits and potential risks
Abstract
Objective: Although industrial sectors involving semiconductors; memory and storage technologies; display, optical, and photonic technologies; energy; biotechnology; and health care produce the most products that contain nanomaterials, nanotechnology is also used as an environmental technology to protect the environment through pollution prevention, treatment, and cleanup. In this review, we focus on environmental cleanup and provide a background and overview of current practice; research findings; societal issues; potential environment, health, and safety implications; and future directions for nanoremediation. We do not present an exhaustive review of chemistry/engineering methods of the technology but rather an introduction and summary of the applications of nanotechnology in remediation. We also discuss nanoscale zerovalent iron in detail.
Data sources: We searched the Web of Science for research studies and accessed recent publicly available reports from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and other agencies and organizations that addressed the applications and implications associated with nanoremediation techniques. We also conducted personal interviews with practitioners about specific site remediations.
Data synthesis: We aggregated information from 45 sites, a representative portion of the total projects under way, to show nanomaterials used, types of pollutants addressed, and organizations responsible for each site.
Conclusions: Nanoremediation has the potential not only to reduce the overall costs of cleaning up large-scale contaminated sites but also to reduce cleanup time, eliminate the need for treatment and disposal of contaminated soil, and reduce some contaminant concentrations to near zero-all in situ. Proper evaluation of nanoremediation, particularly full-scale ecosystem-wide studies, needs to be conducted to prevent any potential adverse environmental impacts.
Keywords: environmental implications; environmental technology; hazardous wastes; nano-remediation; nanotechnology; pollutants; remediation; toxicity; waste sites; zerovalent iron.
Figures



Republished in
- Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: a review of the benefits and potential risks.Karn B, Kuiken T, Otto M.Karn B, et al.Cien Saude Colet. 2011 Jan;16(1):165-78. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000100020.Cien Saude Colet. 2011.PMID:21180825
Comment in
- Hit or miss?: benefits and risks of using nanoparticles for in situ remediation.Burton A.Burton A.Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Dec;117(12):A552. doi: 10.1289/ehp.117-a552a.Environ Health Perspect. 2009.PMID:20049191Free PMC article.No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: a review of the benefits and potential risks.Karn B, Kuiken T, Otto M.Karn B, et al.Cien Saude Colet. 2011 Jan;16(1):165-78. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000100020.Cien Saude Colet. 2011.PMID:21180825
- Dioxin- and POP-contaminated sites--contemporary and future relevance and challenges: overview on background, aims and scope of the series.Weber R, Gaus C, Tysklind M, Johnston P, Forter M, Hollert H, Heinisch E, Holoubek I, Lloyd-Smith M, Masunaga S, Moccarelli P, Santillo D, Seike N, Symons R, Torres JP, Verta M, Varbelow G, Vijgen J, Watson A, Costner P, Woelz J, Wycisk P, Zennegg M.Weber R, et al.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2008 Jul;15(5):363-93. doi: 10.1007/s11356-008-0024-1. Epub 2008 Jul 3.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2008.PMID:18597132Review.
- In situ nanoremediation of soils and groundwaters from the nanoparticle's standpoint: A review.Marcon L, Oliveras J, Puntes VF.Marcon L, et al.Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 15;791:148324. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148324. Epub 2021 Jun 8.Sci Total Environ. 2021.PMID:34412401Review.
- Nanoremediation technologies for sustainable remediation of contaminated environments: Recent advances and challenges.Ganie AS, Bano S, Khan N, Sultana S, Rehman Z, Rahman MM, Sabir S, Coulon F, Khan MZ.Ganie AS, et al.Chemosphere. 2021 Jul;275:130065. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130065. Epub 2021 Feb 23.Chemosphere. 2021.PMID:33652279Review.
- Ecofriendly nanotechnologies and nanomaterials for environmental applications: Key issue and consensus recommendations for sustainable and ecosafe nanoremediation.Corsi I, Winther-Nielsen M, Sethi R, Punta C, Della Torre C, Libralato G, Lofrano G, Sabatini L, Aiello M, Fiordi L, Cinuzzi F, Caneschi A, Pellegrini D, Buttino I.Corsi I, et al.Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018 Jun 15;154:237-244. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.037. Epub 2018 Feb 22.Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018.PMID:29476973
Cited by
- Nanoscale Metallic Iron for Environmental Remediation: Prospects and Limitations.Noubactep C, Caré S, Crane R.Noubactep C, et al.Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012 Mar;223(3):1363-1382. doi: 10.1007/s11270-011-0951-1. Epub 2011 Sep 22.Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012.PMID:22389536Free PMC article.
- Chitosan: A Green Approach to Metallic Nanoparticle/Nanocomposite Synthesis and Applications.Ben Amor I, Hemmami H, Grara N, Aidat O, Ben Amor A, Zeghoud S, Bellucci S.Ben Amor I, et al.Polymers (Basel). 2024 Sep 21;16(18):2662. doi: 10.3390/polym16182662.Polymers (Basel). 2024.PMID:39339126Free PMC article.Review.
- The toxicity outcome of silica nanoparticles (Ludox®) is influenced by testing techniques and treatment modalities.Fede C, Selvestrel F, Compagnin C, Mognato M, Mancin F, Reddi E, Celotti L.Fede C, et al.Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012 Oct;404(6-7):1789-802. doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-6246-6. Epub 2012 Jul 22.Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012.PMID:23053168Free PMC article.
- Environmentally Sustainable and Ecosafe Polysaccharide-Based Materials for WaterNano-Treatment: An Eco-Design Study.Corsi I, Fiorati A, Grassi G, Bartolozzi I, Daddi T, Melone L, Punta C.Corsi I, et al.Materials (Basel). 2018 Jul 17;11(7):1228. doi: 10.3390/ma11071228.Materials (Basel). 2018.PMID:30018238Free PMC article.Review.
- Modeling the Transport of the "New-Horizon" Reduced Graphene Oxide-Metal Oxide Nanohybrids in Water-Saturated Porous Media.Wang D, Jin Y, Park CM, Heo J, Bai X, Aich N, Su C.Wang D, et al.Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Apr 17;52(8):4610-4622. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06488. Epub 2018 Apr 5.Environ Sci Technol. 2018.PMID:29582656Free PMC article.
References
- Adams LK, Lyon DY, Alvarez PJJ. Comparative ecotoxicity of nanoscale TiO2, SiO2 and ZnO water suspensions. Water Res. 2006;40:3527–3532. - PubMed
- American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. 2009. [[accessed 20 October 2009]]. Public Law 111‐5. Available:http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills....
- Auffan M, Decome L, Rose J, Orsiere T, De Meo M, Briois V, et al. In vitro interactions between DMSA-coated maghemite nanoparticles and human fibroblast: a physicochemical and cytogenotoxical study. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(14):4367–4373. - PubMed
- Biswas P, Wu C-Y. Nanoparticles and the environment. J Air Waste Manag. 2005;55:708–746. - PubMed
- Boxall ABA, Tiede K, Chaudhry Q. Engineered nanomaterials in soils and water: how do they behave and could they pose a risk to human health? Nanomedicine. 2007;2(6):919–927. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources