Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science
Full text links

Actions

Comparative Study
.2009 Dec;28(12):1254-60.
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.06.024. Epub 2009 Sep 26.

Effect of ABO-incompatible listing on infant heart transplant waitlist outcomes: analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effect of ABO-incompatible listing on infant heart transplant waitlist outcomes: analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database

Melanie D Everitt et al. J Heart Lung Transplant.2009 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Midterm heart transplant outcomes of ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) organ use in infants are favorable. ABO-I transplantation has resulted in reduced waitlist mortality in some countries. This study assessed the effect of an ABO-I listing strategy on pre-transplant outcomes in the United States.

Methods: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was used to identify infants aged younger than 1 year listed as status 1 for heart transplantation between January 1, 2001, and May 20, 2008. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: eligible for ABO-compatible (ABO-C) transplant and eligible for ABO-I transplant. Baseline characteristics, waitlist times, and outcomes were compared in univariate analysis. Competing risks analysis evaluated differences in time to transplant in the presence of other outcomes.

Results: Of 1,029 infants listed for transplant, 277 (27%) were listed for an ABO-I transplant. Overall, 92% of transplant recipients received an ABO-C organ regardless of listing type. Among recipients eligible for ABO-I, only 27% received an ABO-I organ. The percentage that underwent transplant in each group did not differ. Although infants listed for an ABO-I organ had a shorter wait time for transplant, waitlist mortality was similar.

Conclusions: Despite the intended merits of ABO-I heart transplantation, ABO-I listing and organ acceptance have not yielded lower waitlist mortality in the United States under the current UNOS allocation algorithm. Consideration should be given to altering the allocation system to one that gives less preference toward blood group compatibility in hopes of improving organ use and reducing waitlist mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp