Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Nature Publishing Group full text link Nature Publishing Group Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2009 Sep;12(9):1097-105.
doi: 10.1038/nn.2360. Epub 2009 Aug 23.

Wnt-mediated activation of NeuroD1 and retro-elements during adult neurogenesis

Affiliations

Wnt-mediated activation of NeuroD1 and retro-elements during adult neurogenesis

Tomoko Kuwabara et al. Nat Neurosci.2009 Sep.

Abstract

In adult hippocampus, new neurons are continuously generated from neural stem cells (NSCs), but the molecular mechanisms regulating adult neurogenesis remain elusive. We found that Wnt signaling, together with the removal of Sox2, triggered the expression of NeuroD1 in mice. This transcriptional regulatory mechanism was dependent on a DNA element containing overlapping Sox2 and T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF)-binding sites (Sox/LEF) in the promoter. Notably, Sox/LEF sites were also found in long interspersed nuclear element 1 (LINE-1) elements, consistent with their critical roles in the transition of NSCs to proliferating neuronal progenitors. Our results describe a previously unknown Wnt-mediated regulatory mechanism that simultaneously coordinates activation of NeuroD1 and LINE-1, which is important for adult neurogenesis and survival of neuronal progenitors. Moreover, the discovery that LINE-1 retro-elements embedded in the mammalian genome can function as bi-directional promoters suggests that Sox/LEF regulatory sites may represent a general mechanism, at least in part, for relaying environmental signals to other nearby loci to promote adult hippocampal neurogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Specific expression of theNeurod1 gene in early committed neurogenic cells in adult hippocampus. (a) Immunohistochemical analysis of neurogenic dentate gyrus area in adult hippocampus of the transgenic mouse that has aSox2 promoter–driven EGFP reporter. Top, Sox2 is shown in green, and we stained for NeuroD1 (red) and S100β (blue). Bottom left, a higher-magnification image is shown with DAPI staining (blue) Bottom right, section stained for NeuroD1 (red), S100β (green) and DAPI (blue). (b) Distinct population of neuroblast cells expressing theNeurod1 gene and mature neurons in adult mouse hippocampus. Top, Sox2 is shown in green in adult hippocampus of aSox2 promoter–driven EGFP reporter transgenic mouse; we also stained for NeuroD1 (red) and NeuN (blue). Bottom, NeuroD1-positive cells (red) and NeuN-positive cells (green) were exclusive to the inner layer of the dentate gyrus. (c) Immunocytochemical analysis of NeuroD1-positive cells in adult rat hippocampus. NeuroD1-positive cells (red) colocalized with Ki67 (cyan). White arrows indicate colocalizing cells; the region in the white square is magnified in a separate window. Bottom left, NeuroD1-positive cells (red) colocalized calretinin (green) and DCX (green). Bottom right, some NeuroD1-positive cells (green) colocalized with nestin (red). White arrows indicate populations of colocalized cells for both markers. (d) Proliferative status of NeuroD1-positive cells in adult hippocampus. BrdU (100 mg per kg of body weight) was injected for 1 week into Fisher 344 rats (7–8 weeks old). Cells that were double positive for NeuroD1 (red) and BrdU (green) are indicated by white arrows. The colocalizing cell (NeuroD1 and BrdU positive) in the white square is magnified on the right.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sox2/LEF DNA regulatory elements on theNeurod promoters. (a) Schematic representation of the binding sites of TCF/LEF and Sox transcription factors on the 3-kb promoters of theNeurod1 andNeurod2 genes. The sequences of the DNA regulatory elements recognized by Sox2 (black box) and TCF/LEF (white box) and the overlapping DNA regulatory consensus sequence (Sox/LEF; gray box) recognized by both Sox2 and TCF/LEF are shown (bottom). (b) Schematic representation of the Sox2/LEF-binding sites (gray boxes) in human, rat, and mouseNeurod1 promoters. (c) Comparison of expression levels between NSCs and differentiating neurons by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) of genes related to Wnt signaling. The expression level ofGfap as a typical glial gene was assessed. Expression levels of β-tubulin III (Tubb3) and synapsin I (Syn1) were also analyzed as neuronal genes. Each mRNA value was normalized to that ofGapdh and then plotted as the fold increase of the sample ofNeurod1 mRNA in NSCs (asterisk). (d) Simple reporter assay with the regulatory elements of Sox2, TCF/LEF and Sox/LEF transcription factors. The luciferase value was snormalized to a sample with a Sox-TATA reporter construct, with an FGF2 ligand (asterisk). (e) Activity of theNeurod1 promoter. A 1.5-kbNeurod1 promoter region (including a Sox/LEF site and a TCF/LEF site) was linked to theluciferase gene. The reporter construct with mutation at the Sox/LEF site on theNeurod1 promoter (NeuroD1 mutant luciferase) was also introduced to the adult NSCs. Luciferase value was normalized to sample with DMSO as a control ligand (asterisk).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Wnt signaling increasesNeurod1 promoter activity during early neurogenesis. (a) Time course ofNeurod1 mRNA expression during the early stages of neurogenesis in cultured adult NSCs. RT-PCR detection ofNeurod1 andGapdh is shown. Western blots of Sox2 and β-catenin during neurogenesis in cultured adult NSCs are shown in the lower panels. (b) Induction of a phosphorylated inactive form of GSK3β to stabilize β-catenin during Wnt signaling in early committed neurogenic cells. Western blots of both GSK3β and phosphorylated GSK3β were conducted using the same neuronal induction treatment. (c) The effect of Wnt signaling on the expression ofNeurod1 mRNA. RT-PCR analysis using total RNA extracted from adult NSCs treated with Dkk1, DnWnt, Wnt3, TDZD8 or β-catenin shRNA. (d) The effect of Wnt signaling on the promoter activity of theNeurod1 gene. The luciferase value was normalized to that of cultured NSC sample with control vector and control ligand (DMSO, asterisk, white bar). (e) The effect of siRNAs targeting Neurog1, Neurog2, Sox2 and β-catenin on Wnt3a ligand–mediated induction onNeurod1 mRNA. qRT-PCR analysis forNeurod1 mRNA was plotted. The amount of mRNA present for each sample was normalized to that ofGapdh and then plotted as the fold increase over the control (control siRNA with DMSO). (f) ChIP analysis at theNeurod1 promoter in adult neurogenesis. PCR primers were designed to surround the Sox/LEF sequence on the ratNeurod1 promoter.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of Wnt signaling on the expression of NeuroD1 and LINE-1 during adult neurogenesis. (a) DNA regulatory elements recognized by Sox2 and TCF/LEF transcription in LINE-1. A schematic representation of the Sox/LEF DNA regulatory elements (gray boxes) in the human, rat, and mouse retrotransposon LINE-1 is shown. (b) Promoter activity of the 5′ UTR and ORF fragment of LINE-1 during adult neurogenesis. Luciferase constructs with 5′ UTR and LINE-1 ORF2 sequences linked to theluciferase gene, in both forward (white) and reverse (black) orientations, were introduced into adult NSCs by lentivirus infection (left and middle panels). Partial fragments of the LINE-1 ORF2, the first 2.5 kb (black columns) and the last 1.5 kb (white columns), were also linked to theluciferase gene in the reporter assay (right). (c) ChIP analysis of rat LINE-1. PCR primers were designed to surround the Sox/LEF DNA regulatory elements. (d) Wnt3a-mediated induced production of LINE-1 ORF2 mRNA. The induction level was measured by qRT-PCR with several synthesized siRNAs. The mRNA level was normalized to that ofGapdh and then plotted as the fold increase over the control (control siRNA with DMSO). (e) The effect of Wnt signaling on the chromatin remodeling of LINE-1. Activation of the chromatin state (acetylation of histone H3) in the LINE-1 sequences was assessed using several Wnt-related constructs. (f) The activation and repression of the LINE-1 promoter. The effect of Wnt on the activity of LINE-1–based promoters was examined using the LINE-1 luciferase construct. After 1 d in the culture, luciferase assays were performed on adult NSCs treated with each construct.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Adult NSC cannot transition to immature and mature granule neurons in β-catenin cKO mice. Immunohistochemical analysis of the Sox2CREGFP cells. (a) Sox2CREGFP retrovirus was injected into the dentate gyrus of control mice (left) or β-catenin cKO mice (right). Immunohistochemical analysis of NeuroD1 (red), GFP (green) and DAPI (blue) in both groups is shown and GFP-positive cells colocalized with NeuroD1-positive cells in control mice (indicated by white arrows, left panels). In control mice, GFP-positive cells were present among the more differentiated neurons deeper in the granule cell layer (left). In β-catenin cKO mice, GFP-positive cells were observed more often near or in the hilus region, rather than among the more differentiated neurons deeper in the granule cell layer. (b) Numbers of GFP-positive cells in the dentate gyrus of control mice (white bars) and β-catenin cKO mice (black bars). (c) Numbers of marker and GFP double-positive cells in the dentage gyrus of control mice (white bars) and β-catenin cKO mice (black bars). (d) Percentages of marker-positive cells in the dentage gyrus of control mice (white bars) and β-catenin cKO mice (black bars).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Lineage tracing Sox2-positive NSCs in β-catenin cKO mice. Immunohistochemical analysis of the Sox2CREGFP cells. (a,b) Sox2-positive cells were able to give rise to GFAP-positive (red,a) and to Sox2-positive NSCs (red,b). Magnified images show triple immunohistochemistry of GFAP (a) or Sox2 (b), GFP (green) and BrdU (blue, lower panels). (c) Immunohistochemical analysis of apoptotic cells labeled by AC3 in β-catenin cKO mice. Representative image of AC3 (red), GFP (green) and DAPI (blue) in control mice (left) and β-catenin cKO mice (right). The GFP-positive cells colocalizing with the AC3-positive cells are indicated by white arrows. The GFP and AC3 double-positive cells in the white dotted square are magnified in the bottom panels. (d) Quantification of GFP-positive and AC3-positive cells in dentate gyrus of control and β-catenin cKO mice. The numbers of the AC3-positive and AC3 and GFP double-positive cells in the dentate gyrus of control mice (white bars) and β-catenin cKO mice (black bars) are plotted.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Infection of lentivirus expressing β-catenin shRNAin vivo. To evaluate the effect of Wnt signalingin vivo, lentivirus expressing β-catenin shRNA or control lentivirus expressing only EGFP (lentivirus-GFP) was stereotactically injected into adult rat hippocampus. (a) Lentivirus-GFP in dentate gyrus. White arrows indicate the population of cells that were double positive for NeuroD1 (red) and EGFP (green). (b) Immunohistochemical analysis of the cells infected by the lentivirus encoding β-catenin shRNA and GFP. Cells expressing β-catenin shRNA and GFP (green) and NeuroD1-positive cells (red) are shown.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Activity of LINE-1 as a promoter in adult rat hippocampus. (ad) We examined the activity and specificity of the LINE-1–based promoter in adult rat hippocampus. EGFP-expressing lentivirus, under the control of the LINE-1–based promoter, was stereotactically microinjected into the dentate gyrus of adult rats and the population of GFP-positive cells (green) was analyzed by immunohistochemistry using an antibody to NeuroD1 (red,a). Comparisons of the LINE-GFP population (green) to TUJ1 staining (red,b), NeuN staining (red,c) and Sox2 staining (magenta,d) are also shown.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Suh H, et al. In vivo fate analysis reveals the multipotent and self-renewal capacities of Sox2+ neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:515–528. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Song H, Stevens CF, Gage FH. Astroglia induce neurogenesis from adult neural stem cells. Nature. 2002;417:39–44. - PubMed
    1. Barkho BZ, et al. Identification of astrocyte-expressed factors that modulate neural stem/progenitor cell differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. 2006;15:407–421. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lie DC, et al. Wnt signaling regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Nature. 2005;437:1370–1375. - PubMed
    1. Galceran J, Miyashita-Lin EM, Devaney E, Rubenstein JL, Grosschedl R. Hippocampus development and generation of dentate gyrus granule cells is regulated by LEF1. Development. 2000;127:469–482. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Nature Publishing Group full text link Nature Publishing Group Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp