Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2009 Apr 17;137(2):273-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.058.

A microRNA imparts robustness against environmental fluctuation during development

Affiliations

A microRNA imparts robustness against environmental fluctuation during development

Xin Li et al. Cell..

Abstract

The microRNA miR-7 is perfectly conserved from annelids to humans, and yet some of the genes that it regulates in Drosophila are not regulated in mammals. We have explored the role of lineage restricted targets, using Drosophila, in order to better understand the evolutionary significance of microRNA-target relationships. From studies of two well characterized developmental regulatory networks, we find that miR-7 functions in several interlocking feedback and feedforward loops, and propose that its role in these networks is to buffer them against perturbation. To directly demonstrate this function for miR-7, we subjected the networks to temperature fluctuation and found that miR-7 is essential for the maintenance of regulatory stability under conditions of environmental flux. We suggest that some conserved microRNAs like miR-7 may enter into novel genetic relationships to buffer developmental programs against variation and impart robustness to diverse regulatory networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Non-conserved expression and targeting of miR-7
(A–C) Localization of miR-7 RNA (purple) and Sens protein (green) in developing antenna (A), leg (B) and wing (C) discs. The miR-7 RNA is detected in the cytoplasm of proprioceptor and olfactory SOP cells, which are marked with Sens-positive nuclei. Comparable sensory organs in vertebrates do not express miR-7. (D) Overlap of predicted miR-7 targets inDrosophila and human is limited to nine orthologous genes.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Regulation of miR-7 expression in photoreceptors
(A) Schematic representation of the transgenic reporter formiR-7 enhancer activityin vivo. The enhancer contains binding sites for Ttk69 (Ttk1–2), Yan and Pnt-P1 (Ebs1–4), and Ato/Da (Prn1–2). The enhancer was placed upstream of a minimal promoter and nuclear GFP coding sequence. (B,B′) Localization of miR-7 RNA (red) and Elav protein (blue) in a developing eye disc. The vertical red stripe in (B′) corresponds to cells in the morphogenetic furrow (arrowhead), which is the zone of R8 photoreceptor determination. To the right of this zone other photoreceptors are then determined, as marked by their expression of Elav. (C,C′)miR-7 enhancer activity in a developing eye disc, as detected by the (miR-7)E>GFP reporter (green). Elav (blue) marks photoreceptor cells. The vertical green stripe in (C′) corresponds to cells in the morphogenetic furrow (arrowhead). Expression is weakly variegated, suggesting additional regulatory elements might be missing. (D–F)miR-7 enhancer activity as detected by the reporter (green) in wildtype (D),yan1 (E),GMRPnt-P1 (F) eye discs. Enhancer activity is stronger inyan1 andGMRPnt-P1 precursor cells, which are not marked with Elav (purple). TheGMR driver expresses genes (in this casePnt-P1) in precursor and photoreceptor cells. (G,H) miR-7 RNA detected by colorimetric in situ hybridization in wildtype (G), andGMRTtk69 (H) eye discs. (I,J)miR-7 enhancer activity as reported (green) in wildtype (I) andGMRTtk69 (J) eye discs. (K,L)miR-7 enhancer activity as reported (green) inGMREGFR.Act (EGFR.λtop) (K) andGMREGFR.DN (L) eye discs. These mutants drive constitutively active EGFR and dominant negative EGFR, respectively, in photoreceptors and their precursors. (M–P) Wildtype (M and O), andNts3 (N and P) larvae were shifted to the restrictive temperature (31°C) for 19 hrs before analysis. (M,N) miR-7 RNA detected byin situ hybridization. (O,P)miR-7 enhancer activity as detected by the reporter.
Figure 3
Figure 3. miR-7 stabilization of gene regulatory networks
(A) The network controlling photoreceptor determination. Shown are signal transduction components (yellow), transcription factors (blue) and miR-7 (red) in the network. The miRNA participates in two interlocking coherent feedforward loops, labeled 1 and 2. Loop 1 is highlighted in green and loop 2 is in orange. A typical coherent feedforward loop of this type is shown to the right. The interlocked loops together construct a double-negative feedback loop between miR-7 and Yan. (B) The network controlling SOP determination. Components are color-coded as in (A). miR-7 participates in an incoherent feedforward loop highlighted in green. A typical incoherent feedforward loop of this type is shown to the right. The feedforward loop is also interconnected with a double-negative feedback loop between Atonal and E(spl), with miR-7 as an effector of Atonal, and E(spl) directly inhibiting Atonal (orange).
Figure 4
Figure 4. The enhancer drivesmiR-7 expression in SOP cells
(A–C) miR-7 RNA (purple) in antenna (A), leg (B) and wing (C) discs. (D–F)miR-7 enhancer activity (green) in antenna (D), leg (E) and wing (F) discs that are counterstained for nuclei in blue. (G–I″)miR-7 enhancer activity as reported (cyan) in antenna (G,G′), leg (H,H′) and wing (I,I′) discs. (G,G″,H,H″,I,I″) Discs were counterstained for Ato protein (red). Merged fluorescence due to reporter GFP and Ato colocalization appears white.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Regulation of miR-7 expression in photoreceptors
(A–F)miR-7 enhancer activity (green) inptc>Ato (A–C), andptc>Sc (D–F) imaginal discs that are counterstained for nuclei in blue. Theptc driver expresses Ato and Sc in a stripe of cells along the anteroposterior (vertical) midline of the discs. (G and H)miR-7 enhancer activity (green) in wildtype (G), andGMR>Ato (H) eye discs. (I–L) Activity of the mutatedmiR-7 enhancer with altered Ato-binding sites. (miR-7)E>GFP(-Prn) reporter expression (green) in eye (I), leg (J), wing (K), and antenna (L) discs. The leg, wing, and antenna were counterstained for nuclei in blue. The eye disc was counterstained for Elav protein in red. Note the enhancer is inactive in the morphogenetic furrow (arrowhead) of the eye where R8 photoreceptors are determined.
Figure 6
Figure 6. miR-7 regulates Ato expression and SOP determination
(A–L) SOP cells are marked with Sens protein in green. (A) A wing disc at low magnification shows the pattern of all wing SOPs, with a grey box highlighting the dorsal radius SOP group. (B–L) High magnification view of the dorsal radius group from (B) wildtype, (C)miR-7Δ1/Df(2R)exu1, (D)dppAto, (E)dppdsRed-miR-7, (F)dppmiR-7-1401, (G)dppE(spl)m7, (H) dpp≫dsRed-miR-7E(spl)m7, (I)dppE(spl)m8, (J)dppdsRed-miR-7E(spl)m8, (K)dppE(spl)mδ, (L)dppdsRed-miR-7E(spl)mδ wing discs. Thedpp driver expressesmiR-7 andE(spl) genes in a stripe of cells along the anteroposterior midline of the wing, which is visualized by the dsRed fluorescence from thedsRed-miR-7 chimera gene, observed in panels (E,H,J,L). The arrow in (E) points to an expanded cluster of dorsal radius SOP cells where miR-7 is misexpressed, relative to a cluster of SOP cells in wildtype, as highlighted with the arrow in (B). ThemiR-7-1401 transgene, when misexpressed, gives a comparable phenotype but is not marked by dsRed. (M) Percentage of adults with ectopic or missing external sensory bristles (scutellar and sternopleural) observed in various mutants. N indicates total animals scored for wildtype (n=198),dppAto (n=89),dppdsRed-miR-7 (n=118),dppE(spl)m7 (n=193),dppE(spl)m8 (n=166),dppE(spl)mδ,dppdsRed-miR-7E(spl)m7 (n=111),dppdsRed-miR-7E(spl)m8 (n=168), anddppdsRed-miR-7E(spl)mδ(n=313) (N, O)miR-7 enhancer activity as reported (green) in the wing dorsal radius group counterstained with dsRed (red) from controlptcdsRed (N) andptcdsRed-miR-7 (O) animals. (P,Q) Ato protein (green) in wildtype (P) andhairydsRed-miR-7 (Q) eye discs. dsRed (red) indicates where miR-7 is misexpressed. (R,S) R8 photoreceptors marked with Sens (green) and other photoreceptors marked with Elav (blue) in wildtype (R) andhairydsRed-miR-7 (S) eye discs. dsRed (red) indicates area where miR-7 is misexpressed. Photoreceptor clusters normally have a single R8 cell. Circles in (S) highlight some mutant clusters with more than one R8 cell.
Figure 7
Figure 7.miR-7 stabilizes gene expression and SOP determination under temperature fluctuation
(A–B′) Ato protein (purple) in wildtype (A,A′), andmiR-7Δ1/Df(2R)exu1 mutant (B,B′) eye discs from animals grown under uniform temperature conditions. (A,B) show maximal projections of confocal z stacks. (A′,B′) show single focal planes. (C–D′) Ato (purple) and Yan (green) proteins in wildtype (C,C′) andmiR-7Δ1/Df(2R)exu1 mutant (D,D′) eye discs from animals grown under fluctuating temperature conditions. Images are maximal projections of confocal z stacks. (E-E″) Ato (red) and Sens (green) proteins in wildtype antennal discs from animals grown under fluctuating temperature steps. Sens marks the SOPs while Ato marks the PNCs. Sensory organs are progressively more developed in each panel. (E) An arc of coeloconic sensilla SOPs co-expressing Sens and Ato is first evident (purple arrowheads), along with the nascent Johnston’s organ, marked JO. A ring of cells expressing Ato surrounds the initial arista SOPs (arrow). (E′) SOP numbers increase within each organ system, and expression of Ato in these cells is reduced. (E″) There appears new rows of SOPs that are enveloped by cells with upregulated Ato (box). (F-F″)miR-7Δ1/Df(2R)exu1 mutant antennal discs from animals grown under fluctuating temperature conditions. (F) The nascent Johnston’s organ (JO) appears normal, but the arc of coeloconic sensilla SOPs (purple arrowheads) is depleted at the top of the arc. Cells in the arista domain do not express a ring of Ato and do not form arista SOPs (arrow). (F′) Deficits in SOP cell number and spacing in the arista and coeloconic SOPs are further seen. (F″) In addition to reduced SOP numbers, there is little or no up-regulation of Ato in cells enveloping new SOPs (box).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD, Lake RJ. Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science. 1999;284:770–776. - PubMed
    1. Baek D, Villen J, Shin C, Camargo FD, Gygi SP, Bartel DP. The impact of microRNAs on protein output. Nature. 2008;455:64–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barolo S, Castro B, Posakony JW. New Drosophila transgenic reporters: insulated P-element vectors expressing fast-maturing RFP. Biotechniques . 2004;36:436–440. 442. - PubMed
    1. Bushati N, Cohen SM. microRNA functions. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2007;23:175–205. - PubMed
    1. Cave JW, Loh F, Surpris JW, Xia L, Caudy MA. A DNA transcription code for cell-specific gene activation by notch signaling. Curr Biol. 2005;15:94–104. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp