Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Wolters Kluwer full text link Wolters Kluwer
Full text links

Actions

Share

.2008 Dec;122(6):1780-1789.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818a9b25.

Aesthetic labia minora and clitoral hood reduction using extended central wedge resection

Affiliations

Aesthetic labia minora and clitoral hood reduction using extended central wedge resection

Gary J Alter. Plast Reconstr Surg.2008 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The central wedge excision to reduce the labia minora was reported in 1998. The purpose of this article is to present recent modifications and results of this technique.

Methods: A central wedge or V is removed from the most protuberant portion of each labium minus. The outer portion of the V excision is usually curved lateral and anterior to excise redundant lateral labium and excess lateral clitoral hood. Postoperative examinations were performed when possible. Two separate mailings of questionnaires were sent, and follow-up phone calls were made to nonresponders.

Results: A total of 407 patients had labia reductions from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2006. All but 14 (3 percent) were bilateral. Ages ranged from 13 to 63 years (average, 32.4 years). Almost all patients had some lateral clitoral hood excisions with the extension of the lateral hockey-stick design. Postoperative examinations at least 2 weeks after surgery were performed on 123 patients. The total number of patients undergoing reoperation was 12 of 407 (2.9 percent). Patients responding to the questionnaire (166 of 407) were pleased with the surgery by an average score of 9.2 of 10 (where 10 = most pleased). Improvement in self-esteem (93 percent), sex life (71 percent), and discomfort (95 percent) was reported with a low significant complication rate (4 percent); 163 of the respondents (98 percent) would undergo the surgery again.

Conclusion: Central wedge reduction with lateral clitoral hood reduction is a safe, effective procedure with few complications and high patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hodgkinson, D. J., and Hait, G. Aesthetic vaginal labioplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 74: 414, 1984.
    1. Gowen, R. M., and Martin, V. L. Labia minora reduction in an iron-lung disabled woman. Obstet. Gynecol. 71: 488, 1988.
    1. Radman, H. M. Hypertrophy of the labia minora. Obstet. Gynecol. 48(Suppl.): 78S, 1976.
    1. Caparo, V. J. Congenital anomalies. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 14: 988, 1971.
    1. Chavis, W. M., LaFerla, J. J., and Niccolini, R. Plastic repair of elongated, hypertrophic labia minora: A case report. J. Reprod. Med. 34: 373, 1989.

MeSH terms

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Wolters Kluwer full text link Wolters Kluwer
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp