The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer
- PMID:19035858
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08183.x
The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of degarelix, a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (blocker), vs leuprolide for achieving and maintaining testosterone suppression in a 1-year phase III trial involving patients with prostate cancer.
Patients and methods: In all, 610 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (any stage; median age 72 years; median testosterone 3.93 ng/mL, median prostate-specific antigen, PSA, level 19.0 ng/mL) were randomized and received study treatment. Androgen-deprivation therapy was indicated (neoadjuvant hormonal treatment was excluded) according to the investigator's assessment. Three dosing regimens were evaluated: a starting dose of 240 mg of degarelix subcutaneous (s.c.) for 1 month, followed by s.c. maintenance doses of 80 mg or 160 mg monthly, or intramuscular (i.m.) leuprolide doses of 7.5 mg monthly. Therapy was maintained for the 12-month study. Both the intent-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol populations were analysed.
Results: The primary endpoint of the trial was suppression of testosterone to <or=0.5 ng/mL at all monthly measurements from day 28 to day 364, thus defining the treatment response. This was achieved by 97.2%, 98.3% and 96.4% of patients in the degarelix 240/80 mg, degarelix 240/160 mg and leuprolide groups, respectively (ITT population). At 3 days after starting treatment, testosterone levels were <or=0.5 ng/mL in 96.1% and 95.5% of patients in the degarelix 240/80 mg and 240/160 mg groups, respectively, and in none in the leuprolide group. The median PSA levels at 14 and 28 days were significantly lower in the degarelix groups than in the leuprolide group (P < 0.001). The hormonal side-effect profiles of the three treatment groups were similar to previously reported effects for androgen-deprivation therapy. The s.c. degarelix injection was associated with a higher rate of injection-site reactions than with the i.m. leuprolide injection (40% vs <1%; P < 0.001, respectively). There were additional differences between the degarelix and leuprolide groups for urinary tract infections (3% vs 9%. P < 0.01, respectively), arthralgia (4% vs 9%, P < 0.05, respectively) and chills (4% vs 0%, P < 0.01, respectively). There were no systemic allergic reactions.
Conclusions: Degarelix was not inferior to leuprolide at maintaining low testosterone levels over a 1-year treatment period. Degarelix induced testosterone and PSA suppression significantly faster than leuprolide; PSA suppression was also maintained throughout the study. Degarelix represents an effective therapy for inducing and maintaining androgen deprivation for up to 1 year in patients with prostate cancer, and has a different mechanism of action from traditional GnRH agonists. Its immediate onset of action achieves a more rapid suppression of testosterone and PSA than leuprolide. Furthermore, there is no need for antiandrogen supplements to prevent the possibility of clinical 'flare'.
Comment in
- Twenty-five year evolution of medical hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.Moul JW.Moul JW.BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(2):145-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08271.x.BJU Int. 2009.PMID:19278531No abstract available.
- Words of wisdom. Re: the efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open- label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer.Jocham D, Doehn C.Jocham D, et al.Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1488-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.039.Eur Urol. 2009.PMID:19650242No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Changes in alkaline phosphatase levels in patients with prostate cancer receiving degarelix or leuprolide: results from a 12-month, comparative, phase III study.Schröder FH, Tombal B, Miller K, Boccon-Gibod L, Shore ND, Crawford ED, Moul J, Olesen TK, Persson BE.Schröder FH, et al.BJU Int. 2010 Jul;106(2):182-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08981.x. Epub 2009 Nov 13.BJU Int. 2010.PMID:19912212Clinical Trial.
- A 1-year, open label, randomized phase II dose finding study of degarelix for the treatment of prostate cancer in North America.Gittelman M, Pommerville PJ, Persson BE, Jensen JK, Olesen TK; Degarelix Study Group.Gittelman M, et al.J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):1986-92. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.033. Epub 2008 Sep 17.J Urol. 2008.PMID:18801505Clinical Trial.
- Degarelix: a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for the management of prostate cancer.Steinberg M.Steinberg M.Clin Ther. 2009;31 Pt 2:2312-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.009.Clin Ther. 2009.PMID:20110043Review.
- Degarelix: a new approach for the treatment of prostate cancer.Persson BE, Kold Olesen T, Jensen JK.Persson BE, et al.Neuroendocrinology. 2009;90(3):235-44. doi: 10.1159/000228832. Epub 2009 Jul 14.Neuroendocrinology. 2009.PMID:19602868
- Gonadotropin-releasing hormone: an update review of the antagonists versus agonists.Van Poppel H, Klotz L.Van Poppel H, et al.Int J Urol. 2012 Jul;19(7):594-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.02997.x. Epub 2012 Mar 14.Int J Urol. 2012.PMID:22416801Review.
Cited by
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular disease risk with degarelix and GnRH agonists in prostate cancer.de Moraes FCA, Sano VKT, Dantas CR, Hoffmeister N, Kelly FA, Burbano RMR.de Moraes FCA, et al.Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Nov 5. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03772-2. Online ahead of print.Clin Transl Oncol. 2024.PMID:39500846
- An Update on Triptorelin: Current Thinking on Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.Merseburger AS, Hupe MC.Merseburger AS, et al.Adv Ther. 2016 Jul;33(7):1072-93. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0351-4. Epub 2016 May 31.Adv Ther. 2016.PMID:27246172Free PMC article.Review.
- Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: recommendations of the St Gallen Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2015.Gillessen S, Omlin A, Attard G, de Bono JS, Efstathiou E, Fizazi K, Halabi S, Nelson PS, Sartor O, Smith MR, Soule HR, Akaza H, Beer TM, Beltran H, Chinnaiyan AM, Daugaard G, Davis ID, De Santis M, Drake CG, Eeles RA, Fanti S, Gleave ME, Heidenreich A, Hussain M, James ND, Lecouvet FE, Logothetis CJ, Mastris K, Nilsson S, Oh WK, Olmos D, Padhani AR, Parker C, Rubin MA, Schalken JA, Scher HI, Sella A, Shore ND, Small EJ, Sternberg CN, Suzuki H, Sweeney CJ, Tannock IF, Tombal B.Gillessen S, et al.Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1589-604. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv257. Epub 2015 Jun 3.Ann Oncol. 2015.PMID:26041764Free PMC article.
- FSH Is Responsible for Androgen Deprivation Therapy-Associated Atherosclerosis in Mice by Exaggerating Endothelial Inflammation and Monocyte Adhesion.Wang Q, Han J, Liang Z, Geng X, Du Y, Zhou J, Yao W, Xu T.Wang Q, et al.Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2024 Mar;44(3):698-719. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.123.319426. Epub 2024 Jan 11.Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2024.PMID:38205641Free PMC article.
- Management of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.Bernard B, Sweeney CJ.Bernard B, et al.Curr Urol Rep. 2015 Mar;16(3):14. doi: 10.1007/s11934-015-0488-8.Curr Urol Rep. 2015.PMID:25677237Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous