Gait analysis of children treated for clubfoot with physical therapy or the Ponseti cast technique
- PMID:18594100
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00201
Gait analysis of children treated for clubfoot with physical therapy or the Ponseti cast technique
Abstract
Background: Currently, clubfoot is initially treated with nonoperative methods including the Ponseti cast technique and the French functional physical therapy program. Our goal was to evaluate the function of children treated with these techniques.
Methods: We reviewed the cases of 182 patients with idiopathic clubfoot (273 feet) who were initially treated nonoperatively. Seventy-seven patients (119 feet) were excluded because they had either received a combination of nonoperative treatments or had undergone surgery prior to testing. Gait analysis was performed when the children were approximately two years of age. Temporal and kinematic data were classified as abnormal if they were more than one standard deviation from normal.
Results: Gait analysis was performed on 105 patients (fifty-six treated with casts and forty-nine treated with physical therapy) with 154 involved feet (seventy-nine treated with casts and seventy-five treated with physical therapy). These patients were an average of two years and three months of age, and their initial Diméglio scores ranged between 10 and 17. No significant differences in cadence parameters were found between the two groups. The rate of normal kinematic ankle motion in the sagittal plane was higher in the group treated with physical therapy (65% of the feet) than it was in the group treated with the Ponseti cast technique (47%) (p = 0.0317). More children treated with physical therapy walked with knee hyperextension (37% of the feet) (p < 0.0001), an equinus gait (15%) (p = 0.0051), and footdrop (19%) (p = 0.0072); only one patient treated with casts walked with an equinus gait, and only three demonstrated footdrop. In contrast, more of the patients in the cast-treatment group demonstrated excessive stance-phase dorsiflexion (48% of the feet) (p < 0.0001) and a calcaneus gait (10%). More feet in the physical therapy group had an increased internal foot progression angle (44% compared with 24% in the cast-treatment group; p = 0.0144) and increased shank-based foot rotation (73% compared with 57% in the cast-treatment group; p = 0.05).
Conclusions: While the rate of normal kinematic ankle motion in the sagittal plane was 65% in the group treated with physical therapy, the gait abnormalities that were seen in that group were characterized by mild equinus and/or footdrop. The rate of normal kinematic ankle motion in the sagittal plane was 47% in the cast-treatment group, but the most common gait abnormality in this group was mildly increased dorsiflexion in the stance phase. The rates of calcaneus gait and equinus gait were <or=15% in each nonoperative group. The differences between the physical therapy and cast-treatment groups may, in part, be the result of the percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening that is performed as part of the Ponseti cast technique but not as part of the physical therapy program.
Similar articles
- Gait analysis of children treated for moderate clubfoot with physical therapy versus the Ponseti cast technique.Gottschalk HP, Karol LA, Jeans KA.Gottschalk HP, et al.J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Apr-May;30(3):235-9. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181d3cba8.J Pediatr Orthop. 2010.PMID:20357588Clinical Trial.
- A comparison of two nonoperative methods of idiopathic clubfoot correction: the Ponseti method and the French functional (physiotherapy) method. Surgical technique.Steinman S, Richards BS, Faulks S, Kaipus K.Steinman S, et al.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct 1;91 Suppl 2:299-312. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00369.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009.PMID:19805592
- A Longitudinal Review of Gait Following Treatment for Idiopathic Clubfoot: Gait Analysis at 2 and 5 Years of Age.Jeans KA, Erdman AL, Jo CH, Karol LA.Jeans KA, et al.J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Sep;36(6):565-71. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000515.J Pediatr Orthop. 2016.PMID:25985372
- Idiopathic congenital clubfoot: Initial treatment.Bergerault F, Fournier J, Bonnard C.Bergerault F, et al.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Feb;99(1 Suppl):S150-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.001. Epub 2013 Jan 21.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013.PMID:23347754Review.
- Midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of arthrogryposis-associated clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method: a retrospective observational study and comprehensive literature review.Berger N, Forkl H, Heimkes B, Frimberger V, Wagner F, Hildebrand F, Delbrück H.Berger N, et al.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Sep 28;19(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05101-3.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024.PMID:39342344Free PMC article.Review.
Cited by
- This is a narrative review of the functional evaluation of clubfoot treatment with gait analysis.Karol LA, Jeans KA.Karol LA, et al.Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(13):1105. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6922.Ann Transl Med. 2021.PMID:34423017Free PMC article.Review.
- Foot function during gait and parental perceived outcome in older children with symptomatic club foot deformity.McCahill JL, Stebbins J, Harlaar J, Prescott R, Theologis T, Lavy C.McCahill JL, et al.Bone Jt Open. 2020 Nov 2;1(7):384-391. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.17.BJO-2020-0046.R1. eCollection 2020 Jul.Bone Jt Open. 2020.PMID:33215128Free PMC article.
- Functional Assessment of the Foot Undergoing Percutaneous Achilles Tenotomy in Term of Gait Analysis.Liu YB, Jiang SY, Zhao L, Yu Y, Tao XC, Zhao DH.Liu YB, et al.Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1973403. doi: 10.1155/2016/1973403. Epub 2016 Aug 29.Biomed Res Int. 2016.PMID:27652259Free PMC article.
- Comparison of different conservative treatments for idiopathic clubfoot: Ponseti's versus non-Ponseti's methods.He JP, Shao JF, Hao Y.He JP, et al.J Int Med Res. 2017 Jun;45(3):1190-1199. doi: 10.1177/0300060517706801. Epub 2017 May 28.J Int Med Res. 2017.PMID:28553760Free PMC article.
- Exploring the Unmet Need for Technology to Promote Motor Ability in Children Younger Than 5 Years of Age: A Systematic Review.Arnold AJ, Haworth JL, Moran VO, Abulhasan A, Steinbuch N, Kokkoni E.Arnold AJ, et al.Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020 Apr 5;2(2):100051. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100051. eCollection 2020 Jun.Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020.PMID:33543078Free PMC article.Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous