Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

HighWire full text link HighWire Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

.2008 Jan;33(1):23-33.

Brain response to visual sexual stimuli in homosexual pedophiles

Affiliations

Brain response to visual sexual stimuli in homosexual pedophiles

Boris Schiffer et al. J Psychiatry Neurosci.2008 Jan.

Abstract
in English, French

Objective: The neurobiological mechanisms of deviant sexual preferences such as pedophilia are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to analyze whether brain activation patterns of homosexual pedophiles differed from those of a nonpedophile homosexual control group during visual sexual stimulation.

Method: A consecutive sample of 11 pedophile forensic inpatients exclusively attracted to boys and 12 age-matched homosexual control participants from a comparable socioeconomic stratum underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during a visual sexual stimulation procedure that used sexually stimulating and emotionally neutral photographs. Sexual arousal was assessed according to a subjective rating scale.

Results: In contrast to sexually neutral pictures, in both groups sexually arousing pictures having both homosexual and pedophile content activated brain areas known to be involved in processing visual stimuli containing emotional content, including the occipitotemporal and prefrontal cortices. However, during presentation of the respective sexual stimuli, the thalamus, globus pallidus and striatum, which correspond to the key areas of the brain involved in sexual arousal and behaviour, showed significant activation in pedophiles, but not in control subjects.

Conclusions: Central processing of visual sexual stimuli in homosexual pedophiles seems to be comparable to that in nonpedophile control subjects. However, compared with homosexual control subjects, activation patterns in pedophiles refer more strongly to subcortical regions, which have previously been discussed in the context of processing reward signals and also play an important role in addictive and stimulus-controlled behaviour. Thus future studies should further elucidate the specificity of these brain regions for the processing of sexual stimuli in pedophilia and should address the generally weaker activation pattern in homosexual men.

Objectif: Les mécanismes neurobiologiques des préférences sexuelles déviantes comme la pédophilie sont en grande partie inconnus. Cette étude visait à déterminer si les habitudes d'activation du cerveau des pédophiles homosexuels différaient de celles d'un groupe de sujets témoins homosexuels non pédophiles au cours d'une stimulation sexuelle visuelle.

Méthode: Un échantillon consécutif de 11 patients pédophiles hospitalisés en milieu judiciaire attirés exclusivement par les garçons et 12 participants témoins homosexuels jumelés selon l'âge provenant d'une strate socioéconomique comparable ont subi une imagerie par résonance magnétique fonctionnelle au cours d'une stimulation sexuelle visuelle produite au moyen de photographies excitantes sur le plan sexuel et neutres sur le plan affectif. On a évalué l'excitation sexuelle en fonction d'une échelle d'évaluation subjective.

Résultats: Contrairement aux images neutres sur le plan sexuel, les images excitantes sur le plan sexuel comportant un contenu à la fois homosexuel et pédophile ont activé, chez les sujets des deux groupes, des régions du cerveau reconnues pour participer au traitement des stimuli visuels comportant du contenu émotionnel, y compris les cortex occipitotemporal et préfrontal. Au cours de la présentation des stimuli sexuels respectifs, le thalamus, le pallidum et le corps strié qui correspondent aux régions clés du cerveau impliquées dans l'excitation et le comportement sexuels ont toutefois montré une activation importante chez les pédophiles, mais non chez les sujets témoins.

Conclusions: Le traitement central des stimulis sexuels visuels chez les pédophiles homosexuels semble être comparable à celui qui se produit chez des sujets témoins non pédophiles. Comparativement à des sujets témoins homosexuels, les habitudes d'activation chez les pédophiles sont toutefois reliées plus fortement aux régions sous-corticales dont on a déjà discuté dans le contexte du traitement des signaux de récompense et qui jouent aussi un rôle important dans les comportements d'asservissement et contrôlés par les stimuli. C'est pourquoi des études futures devraient préciser davantage la spécificité de ces régions du cerveau pour ce qui est du traitement des stimuli sexuels chez les pédophiles et devraient porter sur les tendances d'activation généralement plus faibles chez les hommes homosexuels.

Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging, functional; pedophilia; sexual behaviour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1: (A) The study design is illustrated to show the different intra-and intergroup contrasts in a 2 × 2 matrix. The sexual versus neutral block parametrict statistic map of each subject was employed. (B) Subjective ratings of visual stimuli in homosexual control subjects (n = 12) and homosexual pedophiles (n = 11). Each subject rated 7 slides of nude boys and men on a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Data are presented as mean and standard error of the mean.
None
Fig. 2: Intragroup contrast maps. Regional maps of activation in homosexual control subjects and pedophiles for the sexual block versus neutral block contrast in the boys and men conditions. (A) Red = activation map of homosexual control subjects in the men condition. Blue = correlation map of activation and the corresponding sexual arousal ratings; statistical thresholdpuncorrected< 0.001 for a minimum of 5 adjacent voxels (MNI coordinates: 46 × 75 × 11 mm). (B) Red = activation map of homosexual pedophiles in the boys condition. Blue = correlation map of activation and the corresponding sexual arousal ratings; statistical thresholdp < 0.05 (FDR corrected) for a minimum of 5 adjacent voxels (MNI coordinates: 4 × 2 × –14 mm) (C) Regional maps of activation in homosexual control subjects (red) and pedophiles (blue) for the sexual block versus neutral block contrast in the men condition; statistical thresholdpuncorrected< 0.001 for a minimum of 5 adjacent voxels (MNI coordinates: 32 × 13 × 18 mm). (D) Regional maps of activation in homosexual control subjects (blue) and pedophiles (red) for the sexual block versus neutral block contrast in the boys condition; statistical thresholdp < 0.05 (FDR corrected) for a minimum of 5 adjacent voxels (MNI coordinates: 50 × 63 × –14 mm). MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute; FDR = false discovery rate.
None
Fig. 3: Intergroup contrast maps. Regional maps of activation contrasts between pedophiles and control subjects for visual sexual stimulation;p < 0.05 (FDR corrected) for a minimum of 5 adjacent voxels. (A) Red = homosexual control subjects versus homosexual pedophiles in the men condition. Blue = homosexual pedophiles versus homosexual control subjects in the boys condition (MNI coordinates 4 × 9 × 18 mm). (B) Regional maps of activation contrasts for sexual visual stimulation between pedophiles in condition 1 (boys) and control subjects in condition 2 (men) (blue) and reversed (red); statistical thresholdp < 0.05 (FDR corrected) for a minimum of 5 adjacent voxels (MNI coordinates: –44 × 35 × –21 mm). FDR = false discovery rate; MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington: The Association; 1994. (dt. 1996: Diagnostisches und Statistisches Manual Psychischer Störungen — DSM-IV. dt. Bearb. u. Einf. von H. Saß, H.-U. Wittchen, M. Zaudig. Göttingen: Hogrefe).
    1. Fuller AK. Child molestation and pedophilia. An overview for the physician. JAMA 1989;261:602-6. - PubMed
    1. Cohen LJ, Gans S, McGeoch P, et al. Impulsive personality traits in male pedophiles versus healthy controls: is pedophilia an impulsive-aggressive disorder? Compr Psychiatry 2002;43:127-34. - PubMed
    1. Cantor JM, Blanchard R, Christensen BK, et al. Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia. Neuropsychology 2004;18:3-14. - PubMed
    1. Tost H, Vollmert C, Brassen S, et al. Pedophilia: neuropsychological evidence encouraging a brain network perspective. Med Hypotheses 2004;63:528-31. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
HighWire full text link HighWire Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp