Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

BioMed Central full text link BioMed Central Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Editorial
.2008 Jan 7:7:1.
doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-1.

Lessons from the removal of lead from gasoline for controlling other environmental pollutants: a case study from New Zealand

Editorial

Lessons from the removal of lead from gasoline for controlling other environmental pollutants: a case study from New Zealand

Nick Wilson et al. Environ Health..

Abstract

Background: It took over two decades to achieve the removal of leaded gasoline in this country. This was despite international evidence and original research conducted in New Zealand on the harm to child cognitive function and behaviour from lead exposure.

Objective: To identify lessons from the New Zealand experience of removing leaded gasoline that are potentially relevant to the control of other environmental pollutants.

Discussion: From the available documentation, we suggest a number of reasons for the slow policy response to the leaded gasoline hazard. These include: (1) industry power in the form of successful lobbying by the lead additive supplier, Associated Octel; (2) the absence of the precautionary principle as part of risk management policy; and (3) weak policymaking machinery that included: (a) the poor use of health research evidence (from both NZ and internationally), as well as limited use of expertise in academic and non-governmental organisations; (b) lack of personnel competent in addressing technically complex issues; and (c) diffusion of responsibility among government agencies.

Conclusion: There is a need for a stronger precautionary approach by policymakers when considering environmental pollutants. Politicians, officials and health workers need to strengthen policymaking processes and effectively counter the industry tactics used to delay regulatory responses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Tong S, von Schirnding YE, Prapamontol T. Environmental lead exposure: a public health problem of global dimensions. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78:1068–1077. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fischbein A. Occupational and environmental exposure to lead. In: Rom WN, editor. Environmental and occupational medicine (third ed) Philadelphia , Lippincott - Raven; 1998.
    1. Canfield RL, Henderson CR, Cory-Slechta DA, Cox C, Jusko TA, Lanphear BP. Intellectual impairment in children with blood lead concentrations below 10 microg per deciliter. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1517–1526. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022848. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miranda ML, Kim D, Hull AP, Paul CJ, Galeano MA. Changes in blood lead levels associated with use of chloramines in water treatment systems. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:221–225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spivey A. The weight of lead: Effects add up in adults. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:A30–A36. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
BioMed Central full text link BioMed Central Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp