Overstating the evidence for lung cancer screening: the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP) study
- PMID:18039986
- DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.21.2289
Overstating the evidence for lung cancer screening: the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP) study
Abstract
Last year, the New England Journal of Medicine ran a lead article reporting that patients with lung cancer had a 10-year survival approaching 90% if detected by screening spiral computed tomography. The publication garnered considerable media attention, and some felt that its findings provided a persuasive case for the immediate initiation of lung cancer screening. We strongly disagree. In this article, we highlight 4 reasons why the publication does not make a persuasive case for screening: the study had no control group, it lacked an unbiased outcome measure, it did not consider what is already known about this topic from previous studies, and it did not address the harms of screening. We conclude with 2 fundamental principles that physicians should remember when thinking about screening: (1) survival is always prolonged by early detection, even when deaths are not delayed nor any lives saved, and (2) randomized trials are the only way to reliably determine whether screening does more good than harm.
Similar articles
- Inconsistencies in findings from the early lung cancer action project studies of lung cancer screening.Bach PB.Bach PB.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jul 6;103(13):1002-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr202. Epub 2011 Jun 17.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011.PMID:21685356
- Screening for lung cancer.Prosch H, Schaefer-Prokop C.Prosch H, et al.Curr Opin Oncol. 2014 Mar;26(2):131-7. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000055.Curr Opin Oncol. 2014.PMID:24441507Review.
- Computed tomography screening: the international early lung cancer action program experience.Henschke CI, Boffetta P, Yankelevitz DF, Altorki N.Henschke CI, et al.Thorac Surg Clin. 2015 May;25(2):129-43. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2014.12.001.Thorac Surg Clin. 2015.PMID:25901557Review.
- Lung cancer screening--comparison of computed tomography and X-ray.Fujikawa A, Takiguchi Y, Mizuno S, Uruma T, Suzuki K, Nagao K, Niijima M, Edo H, Hino M, Kuriyama T.Fujikawa A, et al.Lung Cancer. 2008 Aug;61(2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.12.010. Epub 2008 Feb 1.Lung Cancer. 2008.PMID:18242764
- The outcome differences of CT screening for lung cancer pre and post following an algorithm in Zhuhai, China.Liu X, Liang M, Wang Y, Chen K, Chen X, Qin P, He J, Yi X.Liu X, et al.Lung Cancer. 2011 Aug;73(2):230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Dec 18.Lung Cancer. 2011.PMID:21168238
Cited by
- Understanding and communicating risk: Measures of outcome and the magnitude of benefits and harms.Bell NR, Dickinson JA, Grad R, Singh H, Kasperavicius D, Thombs BD.Bell NR, et al.Can Fam Physician. 2018 Mar;64(3):181-185.Can Fam Physician. 2018.PMID:29540382Free PMC article.Review.No abstract available.
- The Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS): outcomes within 3 years of a first computed tomography scan.Wilson DO, Weissfeld JL, Fuhrman CR, Fisher SN, Balogh P, Landreneau RJ, Luketich JD, Siegfried JM.Wilson DO, et al.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Nov 1;178(9):956-61. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200802-336OC. Epub 2008 Jul 17.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008.PMID:18635890Free PMC article.
- Convolutional Neural Network ensembles for accurate lung nodule malignancy prediction 2 years in the future.Paul R, Schabath M, Gillies R, Hall L, Goldgof D.Paul R, et al.Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jul;122:103882. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103882. Epub 2020 Jun 24.Comput Biol Med. 2020.PMID:32658721Free PMC article.
- U.S. primary care physicians' lung cancer screening beliefs and recommendations.Klabunde CN, Marcus PM, Silvestri GA, Han PK, Richards TB, Yuan G, Marcus SE, Vernon SW.Klabunde CN, et al.Am J Prev Med. 2010 Nov;39(5):411-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.004.Am J Prev Med. 2010.PMID:20965378Free PMC article.
- Comprendre et expliquer le risque: Mesurer les résultats et l’ampleur des bienfaits et des préjudices.Bell NR, Dickinson JA, Grad R, Singh H, Kasperavicius D, Thombs BD.Bell NR, et al.Can Fam Physician. 2018 Mar;64(3):186-191.Can Fam Physician. 2018.PMID:29540383Free PMC article.French.No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous