Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2007 Aug 22;3(4):390-4.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149.

Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity

Affiliations

Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity

Richard A Fuller et al. Biol Lett..

Abstract

The world's human population is becoming concentrated into cities, giving rise to concerns that it is becoming increasingly isolated from nature. Urban public greenspaces form the arena of many people's daily contact with nature and such contact has measurable physical and psychological benefits. Here we show that these psychological benefits increase with the species richness of urban greenspaces. Moreover, we demonstrate that greenspace users can more or less accurately perceive species richness depending on the taxonomic group in question. These results indicate that successful management of urban greenspaces should emphasize biological complexity to enhance human well-being in addition to biodiversity conservation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between log plant species richness and (a)reflection, (b)distinct identity and (c) the relationship between number of habitat types present in a greenspace andreflection. See text and table 1 for explanation of units.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between perceived and sampled species richness of (a) plants, (b) butterflies and (c) birds. The relationship in the plant data remains highly significant on removal of right-hand data point. See text and table 1 for explanation of units.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Arnold C.L, Jr, Gibbons C. Impervious surface coverage. The emergence of a key environmental indicator. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 1996;62:243–258.
    1. Colwell R.K. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version. 2005:75.
    1. de Vries S, Verheij R.A, Groenewegen P.P, Spreeuwenberg P. Natural environments–healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environ. Plan. A. 2003;35:1717–1731.doi:10.1068/a35111 - DOI
    1. Gotelli N.J, Colwell R.K. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 2001;4:379–391.doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x - DOI
    1. Herzog T.R, Black A.M, Fountaine K.A, Knotts D.J. Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 1997;17:165–170.doi:10.1006/jevp.1997.0051 - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp