Estimating lead time and overdiagnosis associated with PSA screening from prostate cancer incidence trends
- PMID:17501937
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00825.x
Estimating lead time and overdiagnosis associated with PSA screening from prostate cancer incidence trends
Abstract
The introduction of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test has led to dramatic changes in the incidence of prostate cancer in the United States. In this article, we use information on the increase and subsequent decline in prostate cancer incidence following the adoption of PSA to estimate the lead time associated with PSA screening. The lead time is a key determinant of the likelihood of overdiagnosis, one of the main costs associated with the PSA test. Our approach conceptualizes observed incidence as the sum of the secular trend in incidence, which reflects incidence in the absence of PSA, and the excess incidence over and above the secular trend, which is a function of population screening patterns and the unknown lead time. We develop a likelihood model for the excess incidence given the secular trend and use it to estimate the mean lead time under specified distributional assumptions. We also develop a likelihood model for observed incidence and use it to simultaneously estimate the mean lead time together with a smooth secular trend. Variances and confidence intervals are estimated via a parametric bootstrap. Our results indicate an average lead time of approximately 4.59 years (95% confidence interval [3.24, 5.93]) for whites and 6.78 years [5.42, 8.20] for blacks with a corresponding secular trend estimate that is fairly flat after the introduction of PSA screening. These estimates correspond to overdiagnosis frequencies of approximately 22.7% and 34.4% for screen-detected whites and blacks, respectively. Our results provide the first glimpse of a plausible secular trend in prostate cancer incidence and suggest that, in the absence of PSA screening, disease incidence would not have continued its historic increase, rather it would have leveled off in accordance with changes in prostate patterns of care unrelated to PSA.
Similar articles
- Prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in Austria.Vutuc C, Schernhammer ES, Haidinger G, Waldhör T.Vutuc C, et al.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005 Jul;117(13-14):457-61. doi: 10.1007/s00508-005-0395-y.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005.PMID:16091872
- Lead time of prostate cancer detected in population based screening for prostate cancer in Japan.Ito K, Yamamoto T, Miyakubo M, Takechi H, Ohi M, Shibata Y, Suzuki K.Ito K, et al.J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1258-63; discussion 1263-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.144. Epub 2007 Aug 14.J Urol. 2007.PMID:17698107
- Is additional testing necessary in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 1.0 ng/mL or less in a population-based screening setting? (ERSPC, section Rotterdam).Roobol MJ, Roobol DW, Schröder FH.Roobol MJ, et al.Urology. 2005 Feb;65(2):343-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.046.Urology. 2005.PMID:15708050
- Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).Schröder FH.Schröder FH.Can J Urol. 2005 Feb;12 Suppl 1:2-6; discussion 92-3.Can J Urol. 2005.PMID:15780157Review.
- Prognostic value of serum markers for prostate cancer.Stenman UH, Abrahamsson PA, Aus G, Lilja H, Bangma C, Hamdy FC, Boccon-Gibod L, Ekman P.Stenman UH, et al.Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2005 May;(216):64-81. doi: 10.1080/03008880510030941.Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2005.PMID:16019759Review.
Cited by
- Assays for prostate cancer : changing the screening paradigm?Hansen J, Rink M, Graefen M, Shariat S, Chun FK.Hansen J, et al.Mol Diagn Ther. 2013 Feb;17(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s40291-013-0014-y.Mol Diagn Ther. 2013.PMID:23355098
- Performance and inter-observer variability of prostate MRI (PI-RADS version 2) outside high-volume centres.Kohestani K, Wallström J, Dehlfors N, Sponga OM, Månsson M, Josefsson A, Carlsson S, Hellström M, Hugosson J.Kohestani K, et al.Scand J Urol. 2019 Oct;53(5):304-311. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1675757. Epub 2019 Oct 29.Scand J Urol. 2019.PMID:31661357Free PMC article.
- Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer.Heijnsdijk EA, der Kinderen A, Wever EM, Draisma G, Roobol MJ, de Koning HJ.Heijnsdijk EA, et al.Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 1;101(11):1833-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605422. Epub 2009 Nov 10.Br J Cancer. 2009.PMID:19904272Free PMC article.
- Evaluation of new technologies for cancer control based on population trends in disease incidence and mortality.Etzioni R, Durand-Zaleski I, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I.Etzioni R, et al.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;2013(46):117-23. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt010.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013.PMID:23962515Free PMC article.
- Lung cancer screening with CT.Aberle DR, Brown K.Aberle DR, et al.Clin Chest Med. 2008 Mar;29(1):1-14, v. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2007.12.001.Clin Chest Med. 2008.PMID:18267181Free PMC article.Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Related information
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous