Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2006 Sep 22;2(3):385-7.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0463.

Infanticide by subordinates influences reproductive sharing in cooperatively breeding meerkats

Affiliations

Infanticide by subordinates influences reproductive sharing in cooperatively breeding meerkats

Andrew J Young et al. Biol Lett..

Abstract

In cooperative animal societies, dominant females typically show higher breeding success than subordinates, and are commonly believed to control the extent of reproductive sharing. However, studies of social insect societies reveal that subordinates too can interfere with the breeding attempts of others, with important implications for the distribution of fitness within colonies. Here, we show that subordinate females in a high-skew vertebrate (the meerkat, Suricata suricatta), also exert a substantial influence over the reproductive attempts of others. In meerkat societies, pregnant dominants are known to kill subordinate litters, but we show that pregnant subordinates also kill pups; not only those of other subordinates but the dominant's as well. Litters born to females of any rank were half as likely to survive their first 4 days if a subordinate was pregnant. However, dominant females were more likely than subordinates to give birth when no other females were pregnant, and so lost fewer litters to infanticide than subordinates. This is probably due in part to dominants employing counter-tactics to reduce the incidence of subordinate pregnancy. We discuss the broad implications of subordinates having a degree of control over reproductive sharing for future attempts to understand the distribution of reproduction in animal societies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dominant female litters were less likely to survive (mean±s.e.) if one or more subordinate females (SF) were pregnant when the litter was born (n=litters).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Subordinate female litters were less likely to survive (mean±s.e.) if another female (either dominant (DF) or subordinate (SF)) was pregnant when the litter was born (n=litters).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bourke A.F.G, Franks N.R. Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ: 1995. Social evolution in ants.
    1. Clutton-Brock T.H, Brotherton P.N.M, Smith R, McIlrath G.M, Kansky R, Gaynor D, O'Riain M.J, Skinner J.D. Infanticide and expulsion of females in a cooperative mammal. Proc. R. Soc. B. 1998;265:2291–2295.doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0573 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clutton-Brock T.H, et al. Cooperation, control, and concession in meerkat groups. Science. 2001;291:478–481.doi:10.1126/science.291.5503.478 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoogland J.L. Wildlife behavior and ecology. The University of Chicago Press; Chicago, IL: 1995. The black-tailed prairie dog. Social life of a burrowing mammal.
    1. Keller L, Reeve H.K. Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1994;9:98–102.doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90204-6 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp