Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders
- PMID:17121690
- DOI: 10.1017/S0033291706009482
Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders
Abstract
Background: The categorical classification system for personality disorder (PD) has been frequently criticized and several alternative dimensional models have been proposed.
Method: Antecedent, concurrent and predictive markers of construct validity were examined for three models of PDs: the Five-Factor Model (FFM), the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP) model and the DSM-IV in the Collaborative Study of Personality Disorders (CLPS) sample.
Results: All models showed substantial validity across a variety of marker variables over time. Dimensional models (including dimensionalized DSM-IV) consistently outperformed the conventional categorical diagnosis in predicting external variables, such as subsequent suicidal gestures and hospitalizations. FFM facets failed to improve upon the validity of higher-order factors upon cross-validation. Data demonstrated the importance of both stable trait and dynamic psychopathological influences in predicting external criteria over time.
Conclusions: The results support a dimensional representation of PDs that assesses both stable traits and dynamic processes.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous