Constraints in naming parts of the Tree of Life
- PMID:16997582
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.08.001
Constraints in naming parts of the Tree of Life
Abstract
There are now overlapping codes of nomenclature that govern some of the same names of biological taxa. The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) uses the non-evolutionary concept of a "type species" to fix the names of animal taxa to particular ranks in the nomenclatural hierarchy. The PhyloCode, in contrast, uses phylogenetic definitions for supraspecific taxa at any hierarchical level within the Tree of Life (without associating the names to particular ranks), but does not deal with the names of species. Thus, biologists who develop classifications of animals need to use both systems of nomenclature, or else operate without formal rules for the names of some taxa (either species or many monophyletic groups). In addition, the ICZN does not permit the unique naming of many taxa that are considered to be between the ranks of genus and species. Hillis and Wilcox [Hillis, D.M., Wilcox, T.P., 2005. Phylogeny of the New World true frogs (Rana). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 34, 299-314] provided recommendations for the classification of New World true frogs that utilized the ICZN to provide names for species, and the PhyloCode to provide names for supraspecific taxa. Nonetheless, they created new taxon names that followed both sets of rules, to avoid conflicting classifications. They also recommended that established names for both species and clades be used whenever possible, to stabilize the names of both species and clades under either set of rules, and to avoid conflicting nomenclatures. Dubois [Dubois, A., 2006. Naming taxa from cladograms: a cautionary tale. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 42, 317-330] objected to these principles, and argued that the names provided by Hillis and Wilcox [Hillis, D.M., Wilcox, T.P., 2005. Phylogeny of the New World true frogs (Rana). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 34, 299-314] are unavailable under the ICZN, and that the two nomenclatural systems are incompatible. Here, I argue that he is incorrect in these assertions, and present arguments for retaining the established names of New World true frogs, which are largely compatible under both sets of nomenclatural rules.
Similar articles
- Naming taxa from cladograms: a cautionary tale.Dubois A.Dubois A.Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Feb;42(2):317-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Jun 17.Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007.PMID:16949307
- New proposals for naming lower-ranked taxa within the frame of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.Dubois A.Dubois A.C R Biol. 2006 Oct;329(10):823-40. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2006.07.003. Epub 2006 Aug 9.C R Biol. 2006.PMID:17027643
- Are the linnean and phylogenetic nomenclatural systems combinable? Recommendations for biological nomenclature.Kuntner M, Agnarsson I.Kuntner M, et al.Syst Biol. 2006 Oct;55(5):774-84. doi: 10.1080/10635150600981596.Syst Biol. 2006.PMID:17060199
- An overview of bacterial nomenclature with special reference to plant pathogens.Young JM.Young JM.Syst Appl Microbiol. 2008 Dec;31(6-8):405-24. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.09.005.Syst Appl Microbiol. 2008.PMID:19026503Review.
- A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue?Bryant HN, Cantino PD.Bryant HN, et al.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 Feb;77(1):39-55. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005802.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002.PMID:11911373Review.
Cited by
- The frog inner ear: picture perfect?Mason MJ, Segenhout JM, Cobo-Cuan A, Quiñones PM, van Dijk P.Mason MJ, et al.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Apr;16(2):171-88. doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0506-z. Epub 2015 Jan 29.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015.PMID:25630769Free PMC article.
- TBMap: a taxonomic perspective on the phylogenetic database TreeBASE.Page RD.Page RD.BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 May 18;8:158. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-158.BMC Bioinformatics. 2007.PMID:17511869Free PMC article.
- A revised leopard frog phylogeny allows a more detailed examination of adaptive evolution at ranatuerin-2 antimicrobial peptide loci.Tennessen JA, Blouin MS.Tennessen JA, et al.Immunogenetics. 2010 May;62(5):333-43. doi: 10.1007/s00251-010-0430-7. Epub 2010 Feb 24.Immunogenetics. 2010.PMID:20179920
- Micro-habitat distribution drives patch quality for sub-tropical rocky plateau amphibians in the northern Western Ghats, India.Thorpe CJ, Lewis TR, Kulkarni S, Watve A, Gaitonde N, Pryce D, Davies L, Bilton DT, Knight ME.Thorpe CJ, et al.PLoS One. 2018 Mar 26;13(3):e0194810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194810. eCollection 2018.PLoS One. 2018.PMID:29579111Free PMC article.
- Variations in the expressed antimicrobial peptide repertoire of northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens) populations suggest intraspecies differences in resistance to pathogens.Tennessen JA, Woodhams DC, Chaurand P, Reinert LK, Billheimer D, Shyr Y, Caprioli RM, Blouin MS, Rollins-Smith LA.Tennessen JA, et al.Dev Comp Immunol. 2009 Dec;33(12):1247-57. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Aug 3.Dev Comp Immunol. 2009.PMID:19622371Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources