Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2006 Sep;70(3):830-56.
doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00016-06.

Epigenetic gene regulation in the bacterial world

Affiliations

Epigenetic gene regulation in the bacterial world

Josep Casadesús et al. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev.2006 Sep.

Abstract

Like many eukaryotes, bacteria make widespread use of postreplicative DNA methylation for the epigenetic control of DNA-protein interactions. Unlike eukaryotes, however, bacteria use DNA adenine methylation (rather than DNA cytosine methylation) as an epigenetic signal. DNA adenine methylation plays roles in the virulence of diverse pathogens of humans and livestock animals, including pathogenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Vibrio, Yersinia, Haemophilus, and Brucella. In Alphaproteobacteria, methylation of adenine at GANTC sites by the CcrM methylase regulates the cell cycle and couples gene transcription to DNA replication. In Gammaproteobacteria, adenine methylation at GATC sites by the Dam methylase provides signals for DNA replication, chromosome segregation, mismatch repair, packaging of bacteriophage genomes, transposase activity, and regulation of gene expression. Transcriptional repression by Dam methylation appears to be more common than transcriptional activation. Certain promoters are active only during the hemimethylation interval that follows DNA replication; repression is restored when the newly synthesized DNA strand is methylated. In the E. coli genome, however, methylation of specific GATC sites can be blocked by cognate DNA binding proteins. Blockage of GATC methylation beyond cell division permits transmission of DNA methylation patterns to daughter cells and can give rise to distinct epigenetic states, each propagated by a positive feedback loop. Switching between alternative DNA methylation patterns can split clonal bacterial populations into epigenetic lineages in a manner reminiscent of eukaryotic cell differentiation. Inheritance of self-propagating DNA methylation patterns governs phase variation in the E. coli pap operon, the agn43 gene, and other loci encoding virulence-related cell surface functions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Pap phase variation in uropathogenicE. coli. Pap17 pilus phase variation of uropathogenicE. coli strain C1212 was visualized with anti-Pap17 antibodies labeled with 10-nm colloidal gold particles. The bacterium at the left is in the ON-phase state for Pap17 expression, whereas the two bacteria at the right are in the OFF phase. Note that these two bacteria express unmarked Pap21 pili, which are also under phase variation control but are not marked with the anti-Pap17 antiserum. In addition to the Pap pili (diameter of about 7 nm), flagella (diameter of about 20 nm) can also be seen.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Generation of hemimethylated and nonmethylated GATC sites. (A) The vast majority of chromosomal GATC sites inE. coli are fully methylated until DNA replication generates two hemimethylated species, one methylated on the top strand and one methylated on the bottom strand. Within a short time after replication (less than 5 min), Dam methylates the nonmethylated GATC site, regenerating a fully methylated GATC site. (B) Two or more helically phased GATC sites (for example, inoriC) can be bound by SeqA when they are in the hemimethylated state. Binding of SeqA inhibits Dam methylation, maintaining the hemimethylated state for a portion of the cell cycle. Dissociation of SeqA allows Dam to methylate the hemimethylated DNAs, generating fully methylated DNA. (C) Certain GATC sites are present within or adjacent to regulatory protein binding sites. In some but not all cases, protein binding blocks DNA methylation over the entire cell cycle, stabilizing the hemimethylated state in the first generation and leading to a nonmethylated state in the second generation (only the second generation for the DNA methylated on the top strand is shown at the right).
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
The Pap OFF- to ON-phase transition mechanism. The regulatory region of thepap operon is shown at the top, with six DNA binding sites for Lrp (gray rectangles) and GATCprox and GATCdist within Lrp binding sites 2 and 5, respectively. The divergentpapI andpapBA promoters are shown with arrows. Lrp (ovals), PapI (triangles), and PapB (diamonds) are shown. The methylation states of the top and bottom DNA strands of a GATC site are depicted by an open circle (nonmethylated) or closed circle (methylated). The OFF-to-ON switch is described in the text.
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
The Pap ON- to OFF-phase transition mechanism. See the legend to Fig. 3 for explanations of symbols. The ON-to-OFF switch mechanism is described in the text.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
DNA sequence alignment of the GATC box regions from pilus operons under DNA methylation pattern control. DNA base pairs conserved in allpap family regulatory regions are shaded black with light lettering. The distal and proximal regulatory GATC sites (GATCdist and GATCprox, respectively) are shown. Arrows show the inverted orientation of the two GATC box regions. The accession numbers for the sequences shown are as follows:pap, X14471;foo, AF109675;sfa, S59541;afa, X76688;daa, M98766;clp, L48184;fae, X77671;pef, L08613.
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Model for phase variation of the outer membrane protein Ag43. The regulatory region of theagn43 operon is shown at the top (A). The threeagn43 regulatory GATC sites, GATC-I (far left), GATC-II (middle), and GATC-III (right) are depicted as gray rectangles (A). The methylation states of the top and bottom DNA strands of a GATC site are depicted by an open circle (nonmethylated) or closed circle (methylated). “Rep” indicates a DNA replication event. The Ag43 switch model is discussed in the text.
FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.
Epigenetic states of thetraJ gene in theSalmonella virulence plasmid. In the donor cell, DNA hemimethylation permitstraJ transcription only in the plasmid molecule that carries a methyl group in the noncoding DNA strand. As a consequence, plasmid replication generates two epigenetic states in thetraJ gene and permitstraJ transcription in only one daughter plasmid molecule. The methylation states of the top and bottom DNA strands of a GATC site are depicted by an open square (nonmethylated) or closed square (methylated). The possibility that the active epigenetic state oftraJ can be transferred to the recipient cell is at this stage hypothetical.
FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.
Multifactorial basis for attenuation in Dam− mutants ofSalmonella enterica. The lack of strand discrimination for mismatch repair and altered gene expression patterns may explain some of the pleiotropic defects displayed bySalmonella Dam− mutants in the mouse model (13, 89, 208, 210).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abraham, J. M., C. S. Freitag, J. R. Clements, and B. I. Eisenstein. 1985. An invertible element of DNA controls phase variation of type 1 fimbriae of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:5724-5727. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alonso, A., M. G. Pucciarelli, N. Figueroa-Bossi, and F. García-del-Portillo. 2005. Increased excision of theSalmonella prophage ST64B caused by a deficiency in Dam methylase. J. Bacteriol. 187:7901-7911. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aoki, S. K., R. Pamma, A. D. Hernday, J. E. Bickham, B. A. Braaten, and D. A. Low. 2005. Contact-dependent inhibition of growth in Escherichia coli. Science 309:1245-1248. - PubMed
    1. Appelmelk, B. J., S. L. Martin, M. A. Monteiro, C. A. Clayton, A. A. McColm, P. Zheng, T. Verboom, J. J. Maaskant, D. H. van den Eijnden, C. H. Hokke, M. B. Perry, C. M. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, and J. G. Kusters. 1999. Phase variation inHelicobacter pylori lipopolysaccharide due to changes in the lengths of poly(C) tracts in α3-fucosyltransferase genes. Infect. Immun. 67:5361-5366. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arber, W. 1974. DNA modification and restriction. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 14:1-37. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2026 Movatter.jp