Artificial composite bone as a model of human trabecular bone: the implant-bone interface
- PMID:16806236
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.04.007
Artificial composite bone as a model of human trabecular bone: the implant-bone interface
Abstract
The use of artificial bones in implant testing has become popular due to their low variability and ready availability. However, friction coefficients, which are critical to load transfer in uncemented implants, have rarely been compared between human and artificial bone, particularly for wet and dry conditions. In this study, the static and dynamic friction coefficients for four commercially used titanium surfaces (polished, Al(2)O(3) blasted, plasma sprayed, beaded) acting on the trabecular component of artificial bones (Sawbones) were compared to those for human trabecular bone. Artificial bones were tested in dry and wet conditions and normal interface stress was varied (0.25, 0.5, 1.0MPa). Friction coefficients were mostly lower for artificial bones than real bone. In particular, static friction coefficients for the dry polished surface were 20% of those for real bone and 42-61% for the dry beaded surface, with statistical significance (alpha<0.05). Less marked differences were observed for dynamic friction coefficients. Significant but non-systematic effects of normal stress or wet/dry condition on friction coefficients were observed within each surface type. These results indicate that the use of artificial bone models for pre-clinical implant testing that rely on interface load transfer with trabecular bone for mechanical integrity can be particularly sensitive to surface finish and lubrication conditions.
Similar articles
- Effect of compromised cortical bone on implant load distribution.Akça K, Fanuscu MI, Caputo AA.Akça K, et al.J Prosthodont. 2008 Dec;17(8):616-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00365.x. Epub 2008 Sep 16.J Prosthodont. 2008.PMID:18798784
- Experimental determination of friction characteristics at the trabecular bone/porous-coated metal interface in cementless implants.Shirazi-Adl A, Dammak M, Paiement G.Shirazi-Adl A, et al.J Biomed Mater Res. 1993 Feb;27(2):167-75. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820270205.J Biomed Mater Res. 1993.PMID:8436573
- Static coefficient of friction between stainless steel and PMMA used in cemented hip and knee implants.Nuño N, Groppetti R, Senin N.Nuño N, et al.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006 Nov;21(9):956-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.05.008. Epub 2006 Jul 24.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006.PMID:16860449
- [Mechano-active scaffold designs responding to physiological stress and its applications to regenerative medicine].Matsuda T.Matsuda T.Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 2005 Jun;96(6):287-90.Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 2005.PMID:16119778Review.Japanese.No abstract available.
- [Application status of rapid prototyping technology in artificial bone based on reverse engineering].Fang A, Zheng M, Fan D.Fang A, et al.Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Feb;32(1):225-8.Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2015.PMID:25997297Review.Chinese.
Cited by
- Fatigue behavior of Ilizarov frame versus tibial interlocking nail in a comminuted tibial fracture model: a biomechanical study.Hasenboehler E, Smith WR, Laudicina L, Philips GC, Stahel PF, Morgan SJ.Hasenboehler E, et al.J Orthop Surg Res. 2006 Dec 11;1:16. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-1-16.J Orthop Surg Res. 2006.PMID:17156471Free PMC article.
- Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.Campi S, Mellon SJ, Ridley D, Foulke B, Dodd CAF, Pandit HG, Murray DW.Campi S, et al.Bone Joint Res. 2018 May 5;7(3):226-231. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.73.BJR-2017-0193.R1. eCollection 2018 Mar.Bone Joint Res. 2018.PMID:29922440Free PMC article.
- A Finite Element Model to Investigate the Stability of Osteochondral Grafts Within a Human Tibiofemoral Joint.Day GA, Jones AC, Mengoni M, Wilcox RK.Day GA, et al.Ann Biomed Eng. 2024 May;52(5):1393-1402. doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03464-6. Epub 2024 Mar 6.Ann Biomed Eng. 2024.PMID:38446329Free PMC article.
- Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant supported prosthesis--tension tests.Miyashiro M, Suedam V, Moretti Neto RT, Ferreira PM, Rubo JH.Miyashiro M, et al.J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 May-Jun;19(3):244-8. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000300012.J Appl Oral Sci. 2011.PMID:21625741Free PMC article.
- The Influence of Custom-Milled Framework Design for an Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 3D-FEA Sudy.Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Lo Giudice R, Borges ALS, Bottino MA, Epifania E, Ausiello P.Tribst JPM, et al.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 5;17(11):4040. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114040.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020.PMID:32517097Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources