Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Wiley full text link Wiley
Full text links

Actions

Share

Randomized Controlled Trial
.2006 Jun;13(6):623-8.
doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.01.016. Epub 2006 Apr 11.

Laser-assisted anesthesia reduces the pain of venous cannulation in children and adults: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Laser-assisted anesthesia reduces the pain of venous cannulation in children and adults: a randomized controlled trial

Adam J Singer et al. Acad Emerg Med.2006 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: Application of topical anesthetics before intravenous (IV) cannulation is effective yet limited by delayed transdermal absorption. The authors evaluated a handheld laser device to enhance topical anesthetic absorption by ablating the stratum corneum, the major barrier to drug absorption through the skin. The hypothesis was that laser-assisted anesthesia would reduce the pain of IV cannulation in emergency department (ED) patients.

Methods: This was a blinded, randomized, controlled trial. ED patients aged 1 year and older requiring nonemergent IV cannulation were included. Patients were randomized to pretreatment of the skin with laser or sham laser, and standardized venous cannulation was performed on the dorsum of the patients' hands or antecubital fossa. In the experimental group, the area over the target vein was pretreated with a lightweight, portable Er:YAG unit, with a fluence of 3.5 J/cm2, a pulse width of 600 microseconds, and a spot diameter of 6 mm. Lidocaine 4% cream was applied to the area immediately after laser application. Five minutes later, the cream was wiped off and a trained nurse inserted an IV catheter. In the control group, a sham laser and lidocaine were used. Pain of laser application and IV cannulation was recorded on age-appropriate pain scales; presence of infection or abnormal pigmentation was determined at one week. Pain of cannulation was compared using parametric and nonparametric tests.

Results: Sixty-one patients were randomized to laser (30) and sham (31) pretreatment. Mean (+/- SD) age was 27 (+/- 21) years, 49% were female, and one half were children younger than 18 years. The mean pain of IV cannulation was significantly less (mean difference, 28.3 mm; 95% confidence interval = 17.9 to 38.7) in patients pretreated with the laser (10.0 mm; 95% confidence interval = 4.4 to 15.6) than with sham laser (38.3 mm; 95% confidence interval = 29.3 to 42.2). The difference in children was also significant. Application of the laser was painless in most patients. No patient developed infection or abnormal pigmentation.

Conclusions: Pretreatment of the skin with a laser device followed by a five-minute topical lidocaine 4% application reduces the pain of IV cannulation in ED adult and pediatric patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Wiley full text link Wiley
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp