doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3278.
High lift function of the pteroid bone and forewing of pterosaurs
Affiliations
- PMID:16519243
- PMCID: PMC1560000
- DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3278
Item in Clipboard
High lift function of the pteroid bone and forewing of pterosaurs
Matthew T Wilkinson et al. Proc Biol Sci..
Display options
Format
Display options
Format
Abstract
The pteroid bone is a rod-like element found only in pterosaurs, the flying reptiles of the Mesozoic. It articulated at the wrist, and supported a membranous forewing in front of the inner part of the wing spar. The function of this bone, particularly its orientation, has been much debated. It is widely believed that it pointed towards the body, and that the forewing was relatively narrow. An alternative hypothesis states that it was directed forwards during flight, resulting in a much broader forewing that acted as a leading edge flap. We tested scale models in a wind tunnel to determine the aerodynamic consequences of these conflicting hypotheses, and found that performance is greatly improved if the pteroid is directed forwards: the lift: drag ratios are superior and the maximum lift is exceptionally high in comparison with conventional aerofoils. This high lift capability may have enabled even the largest pterosaurs to take off and land without difficulty.
Figures
Skeletal reconstruction ofA. santanae. (a) Reconstructed skeleton of the right wing and membrane outlines in dorsal view, adapted from Wellnhofer (1991b), showing the pteroid in the antero-ventral orientation, supporting a broad propatagium (solid line) and in the medial orientation, supporting a narrow propatagium (broken line): scale bar=200 mm. (b) Right medial carpal in distal view and right pteroid in proximal view, showing the articular surfaces of the carpal–pteroid joint: scale bar=20 mm. (c) Right wrist in antero-medial view, showing articular motion of the pteroid. Two planes have been superimposed, intersecting at the carpal–pteroid joint—one parallel to the wing spar, one normal to it. During the initial phase of flexion the pteroid (solid line) occupies the normal plane, and angulation thus takes the form of pure depression. During the second phase the articular head of the pteroid rotates laterally with respect to the medial carpal, and angulation therefore gradually shifts from depression to adduction. The pteroid swings out of the normal plane until at the limit of flexion (broken line) it comes to occupy the parallel plane. Abbreviations: ch, cheiropatagium; cr, cruropatagium; ds, distal syncarpal; f, femur; fov, fovea of the medial carpal; h, humerus; lf, lateral facet of the pteroid; mc, medial carpal; mf, medial facet of the pteroid; pro, propatagium; ps, proximal syncarpal; pt, pteroid; r, radius; t, tibiotarsus; u, ulna; wf, wing-finger; wm, wing-metacarpal.
Cross-sections of the wing ofA. santanae. (a) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the fleshed-out wing skeleton, cheiropatagium, cruropatagium, and the narrow and broad reconstructions of the propatagium, indicating the plane of the cross-section used for the wind tunnel models. (b–d) Wing sections, with (b) broad, (c) narrow and (d) no propatagium. All three sections are shown at an angle of attack of 0°. Scale bar=50 mm. Abbreviations and symbols: bp, broad propatagium; np, narrow propatagium; s, spar;θe, entry angle;θpd, propatagium deflection angle.
Wind tunnel results for the pterosaur wing sections. (a) Polar diagram, in which the lift and profile drag forces measured for each model have been converted into their respective dimensionless coefficients,CL andCD,pro (equations (4.1) and (4.2)), and plotted against each other. Each point represents aCL andCD,pro value measured at a single angle of attack, and angle of attack increases from −2° at the bottom left to 20° at the top right. Open circles, broad forewing model; closed circles, narrow forewing model; triangles, model without a forewing. (b)L : D ratios. Symbols as in (a). (c) Polar diagram showing the effects of variation inθpd on the performance of the broad propatagium model. Open squares,θpd=30°; closed squares,θpd=40°; crosses,θpd=50°. The solid line indicates the best performance over the entire angle of attack range, and it is this composite polar for the broad propatagium model that has been plotted in (a). (d–f) Polar diagram showing the effects of variation inϵ on the performance of (d) the broad propatagium model, (e) the narrow propatagium model and (f) the model without a propatagium. Open diamonds,ϵ=0.02; closed diamonds,ϵ=0.04; open triangles,ϵ=0.06. The solid lines again indicate the best performance, and are plotted in (a).
Similar articles
- Biomechanics of the unique pterosaur pteroid.Palmer C, Dyke GJ.Palmer C, et al.Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 7;277(1684):1121-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1899. Epub 2009 Dec 9.Proc Biol Sci. 2010.PMID:20007183Free PMC article.
- Sailing the skies: the improbable aeronautical success of the pterosaurs.Wilkinson MT.Wilkinson MT.J Exp Biol. 2007 May;210(Pt 10):1663-71. doi: 10.1242/jeb.000307.J Exp Biol. 2007.PMID:17488930
- Flight in slow motion: aerodynamics of the pterosaur wing.Palmer C.Palmer C.Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 22;278(1713):1881-5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2179. Epub 2010 Nov 24.Proc Biol Sci. 2011.PMID:21106584Free PMC article.
- How the pterosaur got its wings.Tokita M.Tokita M.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015 Nov;90(4):1163-78. doi: 10.1111/brv.12150. Epub 2014 Oct 31.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015.PMID:25361444Review.
- From damselflies to pterosaurs: how burst and sustainable flight performance scale with size.Marden JH.Marden JH.Am J Physiol. 1994 Apr;266(4 Pt 2):R1077-84. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1994.266.4.R1077.Am J Physiol. 1994.PMID:8184949Review.
Cited by
- A potential role for bat tail membranes in flight control.Gardiner JD, Dimitriadis G, Codd JR, Nudds RL.Gardiner JD, et al.PLoS One. 2011 Mar 30;6(3):e18214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018214.PLoS One. 2011.PMID:21479137Free PMC article.
- Constraints on the wing morphology of pterosaurs.Palmer C, Dyke G.Palmer C, et al.Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 22;279(1731):1218-24. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1529. Epub 2011 Sep 28.Proc Biol Sci. 2012.PMID:21957137Free PMC article.
- ROM mapping of ligamentous constraints on avian hip mobility: implications for extinct ornithodirans.Manafzadeh AR, Padian K.Manafzadeh AR, et al.Proc Biol Sci. 2018 May 30;285(1879):20180727. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0727.Proc Biol Sci. 2018.PMID:29794053Free PMC article.
- Biomechanics of the unique pterosaur pteroid.Palmer C, Dyke GJ.Palmer C, et al.Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 7;277(1684):1121-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1899. Epub 2009 Dec 9.Proc Biol Sci. 2010.PMID:20007183Free PMC article.
- Respiratory evolution facilitated the origin of pterosaur flight and aerial gigantism.Claessens LP, O'Connor PM, Unwin DM.Claessens LP, et al.PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004497. Epub 2009 Feb 18.PLoS One. 2009.PMID:19223979Free PMC article.
References
- Alexander R.M. All-time giants: the largest animals and their problems. Palaeontology. 1998;41:1231–1245.
- Applin, Z. T., Gentry, G. L. & Takallu, M. A. 1995 Wing pressure distributions from subsonic tests of a high-wing transport model. NASA-TM4583.
- Bennett S.C. The ontogeny of Pteranodon and other pterosaurs. Paleobiology. 1993;19:92–106.
- Bennett S.C. The osteology and functional morphology of the Late Cretaceous pterosaur Pteranodon. Palaeontographica A. 2001;260:1–153.
- Bramwell C.D, Whitfield G.R. Biomechanics of Pteranodon. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 1974;267:503–581.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources