Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2005 Aug;89(2):1183-93.
doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.057158. Epub 2005 May 27.

Specificity of trypsin and chymotrypsin: loop-motion-controlled dynamic correlation as a determinant

Affiliations

Specificity of trypsin and chymotrypsin: loop-motion-controlled dynamic correlation as a determinant

Wenzhe Ma et al. Biophys J.2005 Aug.

Abstract

Trypsin and chymotrypsin are both serine proteases with high sequence and structural similarities, but with different substrate specificity. Previous experiments have demonstrated the critical role of the two loops outside the binding pocket in controlling the specificity of the two enzymes. To understand the mechanism of such a control of specificity by distant loops, we have used the Gaussian network model to study the dynamic properties of trypsin and chymotrypsin and the roles played by the two loops. A clustering method was introduced to analyze the correlated motions of residues. We have found that trypsin and chymotrypsin have distinct dynamic signatures in the two loop regions, which are in turn highly correlated with motions of certain residues in the binding pockets. Interestingly, replacing the two loops of trypsin with those of chymotrypsin changes the motion style of trypsin to chymotrypsin-like, whereas the same experimental replacement was shown necessary to make trypsin have chymotrypsin's enzyme specificity and activity. These results suggest that the cooperative motions of the two loops and the substrate-binding sites contribute to the activity and substrate specificity of trypsin and chymotrypsin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Superposition of trypsin and chymotrypsin. (A) The two enzymes have very similar tertiary structure. Trypsin is shown in green ribbon and chymotrypsin in blue. Active site residues of trypsin are shown in ball and stick. Loops of trypsin are shown in magenta; loops of chymotrypsin are shown in pale green. S1 binding pocket is shown in red. This figure is drawn using MOLMOL (67). (B) Sequence alignment of trypsin and chymotrypsin around the L1-L2 loop regions. Black shade indicates loops; gray shade indicates substrate-binding pocket. Lowercase letters represent residues mutated in the experiments.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Correlation map of chymotrypsin. Values of correlation between two residues range from −1 to 1. Blue means negative correlation and red means positive correlation, as shown in the color bar on the right. Bothx axis andy axis of this map are chymotrypsin residue indices. The two rectangles indicate the relative position of twoβ-barrels in the protein.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Clustering analysis of chymotrypsin. (A) The mean-square fluctuation of each mode. Note the value does not change much after mode 40, so we have used the first 40 modes in the calculation of correlations. (B) The tree of correlations of chymotrypsin. Residues form clusters and we draw a line to define these clusters for the plot in (Fig. 3C). (C) Different clusters are painted with different colors on the chymotrypsin structure. The colors are chosen arbitrarily.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Local correlation trees of chymotrypsin, trypsin, and the hybrid protein. Total length of horizontal lines between two residues is related to the correlation coefficient. The shorter the length, the stronger the two residues are correlated. (A) The local correlation tree of chymotrypsin around the loop regions. Residues on the two loops (•) cluster together with some of the residues in the S1 pocket (◂). (B) The local tree of trypsin. (C) The local tree of the hybrid protein. In all these figures, many residues in the S1 binding pocket cluster with L1-L2 loops. Fig. 4,A andC, are similar in that the correlations between residues 217–219 and L1-L2 loops are stronger in chymotrypsin and the hybrid protein than in trypsin. Residues shown in lowercase letters are those mutated in experiment (1). Figures are drawn by using TreeExplorer (http://evolgen.biol.metro-u.ac.jp/TE/TE_man.html).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Comparison of pairwise correlations among residues important for activity. This figure showsS-value of some important residue pairs;x axis entries represent different residue pairs; correspondingy axis entry is theS-value. Most correlations of the hybrid protein are trypsin-like but some correlations between key residues become chymotrypsin-like.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Effect of selected modes on protein motion. (A) Contribution of the top modes to the loop region correlation;x axis is mode number, up to 40. Larger numbered modes are not shown because they show little effect on the loop correlation;y axis is the normalized ratio of the contribution. (B) Fluctuations of residues calculated with the most important modes to the loop motion. Modes 3 and 9 were used for trypsin. Modes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 were used for chymotrypsin. Modes 3, 4, 5, 9, and 10 were used for the hybrid protein. (C) Mode 3 of the three proteins. (D) Mode 11 in chymotrypsin, mode 10 in the hybrid protein, and mode 9 in trypsin.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Correlations near the loop region. Correlations between two residues with an absolute value >0.7 are shown in lines. Correlations between 190–193 and Loop D are shown in red. (A) Chymotrypsin; (B) trypsin; (C) the hybrid protein. In chymotrypsin and the hybrid protein, correlations shown in black are stronger than those in trypsin.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hedstrom, L., L. Szilagyi, and W. J. Rutter. 1992. Converting trypsin to chymotrypsin: the role of surface loops. Science. 255:1249–1253. - PubMed
    1. Hedstrom, L. 2002. Serine protease mechanism and specificity. Chem. Rev. 102:4501–4524. - PubMed
    1. Blow, D. M. 1997. The tortuous story of Asp… His… Ser: structural analysis of alpha-chymotrypsin. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22:405–408. - PubMed
    1. Henderson, R. 1970. Structure of crystalline alpha-chymotrypsin. IV. The structure of indoleacryloyl-alpha-chymotrypsin and its relevance to the hydrolytic mechanism of the enzyme. J. Mol. Biol. 54:341–354. - PubMed
    1. Knowles, J. R. 1991. Enzyme catalysis: not different, just better. Nature. 350:121–124. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp