Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

HighWire full text link HighWire Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Review
.2004 Jun 8;170(12):1817-24.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040722.

Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

P J Devereaux et al. CMAJ..

Abstract

Background: It has been shown that patients cared for at private for-profit hospitals have higher risk-adjusted mortality rates than those cared for at private not-for-profit hospitals. Uncertainty remains, however, about the economic implications of these forms of health care delivery. Since some policy-makers might still consider for-profit health care if expenditure savings were sufficiently large, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals.

Methods: We used 6 search strategies to identify published and unpublished observational studies that directly compared the payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. We masked the study results before teams of 2 reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of all studies. We confirmed data or obtained additional data from all but 1 author. For each study, we calculated the payments for care at private for-profit hospitals relative to private not-for-profit hospitals and pooled the results using a random effects model.

Results: Eight observational studies, involving more than 350 000 patients altogether and a median of 324 hospitals each, fulfilled our eligibility criteria. In 5 of 6 studies showing higher payments for care at private for-profit hospitals, the difference was statistically significant; in 1 of 2 studies showing higher payments for care at private not-for-profit hospitals, the difference was statistically significant. The pooled estimate demonstrated that private for-profit hospitals were associated with higher payments for care (relative payments for care 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.33, p = 0.001).

Interpretation: Private for-profit hospitals result in higher payments for care than private not-for-profit hospitals. Evidence strongly supports a policy of not-for-profit health care delivery at the hospital level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1: Methodological steps of our systematic review.
None
Fig. 2: Relative payments for care at private for-profit (PFP) and private not-for-profit (PNFP) hospitals. Note: CI = confidence interval. *The studies are in chronological order by midpoint of the data collection period. †Approximation from investigator.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • The high costs of for-profit care.
    Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU.Woolhandler S, et al.CMAJ. 2004 Jun 8;170(12):1814-5. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040779.CMAJ. 2004.PMID:15184338Free PMC article.No abstract available.
  • Care at for-profit hospitals.
    Richman VV.Richman VV.CMAJ. 2004 Nov 9;171(10):1151; author reply 1151, 1154. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041047.CMAJ. 2004.PMID:15534295Free PMC article.No abstract available.
  • Care at for-profit hospitals.
    Nuttley WM.Nuttley WM.CMAJ. 2004 Nov 9;171(10):1151; author reply 1151, 1154. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041049.CMAJ. 2004.PMID:15534296Free PMC article.No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Lewis S, Donaldson C, Mitton C, Currie G. The future of health care in Canada. BMJ 2001;323(7318):926-9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Devereaux PJ, Choi PT, Lacchetti C, Weaver B, Schunemann HJ, Haines T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing mortality rates of private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals. CMAJ 2002;166(11):1399-406. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Finkler SA. The distinction between cost and charges. Ann Intern Med 1982;96(1):102-9. - PubMed
    1. Fleiss JL. The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 1993; 2(2): 121-45. - PubMed
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557-60. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
HighWire full text link HighWire Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp