Comparing the evidence relevant to impact and flood basalt at times of major mass extinctions
- PMID:12804370
- DOI: 10.1089/153110703321632480
Comparing the evidence relevant to impact and flood basalt at times of major mass extinctions
Abstract
The five major mass extinctions identified in 1982 by Raup and Sepkoski have expanded to six, with the suggestion that the Permian-Triassic extinction was a double event. Is there a general explanation for great mass extinctions, or can they result from different triggers, or even from internal system instabilities? The two most-discussed candidates for a general extinction mechanism are impacts and flood-basalt eruptions. A compilation of evidence for impact at the times of mass extinctions shows that this cause is abundantly confirmed in the case of the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction and the late Eocene, which is a time of minor and gradual extinction, but little or no evidence connects other major extinctions to impact. On the other hand, there is a remarkable time correlation between flood basalts and four major extinctions, but no other evidence that flood basalts cause mass extinctions. The evidence for an impact-extinction linkage is strikingly different from that for a connection between flood basalts and extinctions. Flood basalts cover larger areas than craters and their associated thick ejecta blankets, which are thus less likely to be found. Impacts distribute proxies globally at instantaneous time horizons, whereas flood-basalt events are extended in time, and no remote proxies have been recognized. Many global killing mechanisms have been proposed in the case of impacts, but few have been suggested for flood basalts. It is possible that flood basalts are triggered by impact, but it is not obvious how impacts could result from anything other than chance. The hypothesis that impacts are the general cause of mass extinctions has not received supporting evidence, but has not been falsified. The hypothesis that flood basalts are the general cause of mass extinctions is supported by evidence from timing, but is not susceptible to falsification. Other candidates for general extinction causes, especially sea-level changes and system instabilities, would require separate treatment. The question is still very much open.
Similar articles
- Continental flood basalts drive Phanerozoic extinctions.Green T, Renne PR, Keller CB.Green T, et al.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 20;119(38):e2120441119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120441119. Epub 2022 Sep 12.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022.PMID:36095185Free PMC article.
- A unified theory of impact crises and mass extinctions: quantitative tests.Rampino MR, Haggerty BM, Pagano TC.Rampino MR, et al.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 May 30;822:403-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48358.x.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997.PMID:11543121
- Impact at the Permo-Triassic boundary: a critical evaluation.Erwin DH.Erwin DH.Astrobiology. 2003 Spring;3(1):67-74. doi: 10.1089/153110703321632426.Astrobiology. 2003.PMID:12804365
- Theory and classification of mass extinction causation.Algeo TJ, Shen J.Algeo TJ, et al.Natl Sci Rev. 2023 Sep 8;11(1):nwad237. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwad237. eCollection 2024 Jan.Natl Sci Rev. 2023.PMID:38116094Free PMC article.Review.
- The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary.Schulte P, Alegret L, Arenillas I, Arz JA, Barton PJ, Bown PR, Bralower TJ, Christeson GL, Claeys P, Cockell CS, Collins GS, Deutsch A, Goldin TJ, Goto K, Grajales-Nishimura JM, Grieve RA, Gulick SP, Johnson KR, Kiessling W, Koeberl C, Kring DA, MacLeod KG, Matsui T, Melosh J, Montanari A, Morgan JV, Neal CR, Nichols DJ, Norris RD, Pierazzo E, Ravizza G, Rebolledo-Vieyra M, Reimold WU, Robin E, Salge T, Speijer RP, Sweet AR, Urrutia-Fucugauchi J, Vajda V, Whalen MT, Willumsen PS.Schulte P, et al.Science. 2010 Mar 5;327(5970):1214-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1177265.Science. 2010.PMID:20203042Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical