Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress
- PMID:12214795
- DOI: 10.1017/s0033291702006074
Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress
Abstract
Background: A 10-question screening scale of psychological distress and a six-question short-form scale embedded within the 10-question scale were developed for the redesigned US National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).
Methods: Initial pilot questions were administered in a US national mail survey (N = 1401). A reduced set of questions was subsequently administered in a US national telephone survey (N = 1574). The 10-question and six-question scales, which we refer to as the K10 and K6, were constructed from the reduced set of questions based on Item Response Theory models. The scales were subsequently validated in a two-stage clinical reappraisal survey (N = 1000 telephone screening interviews in the first stage followed by N = 153 face-to-face clinical interviews in the second stage that oversampled first-stage respondents who screened positive for emotional problems) in a local convenience sample. The second-stage sample was administered the screening scales along with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). The K6 was subsequently included in the 1997 (N = 36116) and 1998 (N = 32440) US National Health Interview Survey, while the K10 was included in the 1997 (N = 10641) Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being.
Results: Both the K10 and K6 have good precision in the 90th-99th percentile range of the population distribution (standard errors of standardized scores in the range 0.20-0.25) as well as consistent psychometric properties across major sociodemographic subsamples. The scales strongly discriminate between community cases and non-cases of DSM-IV/SCID disorders, with areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.87-0.88 for disorders having Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores of 0-70 and 0.95-0.96 for disorders having GAF scores of 0-50.
Conclusions: The brevity, strong psychometric properties, and ability to discriminate DSM-IV cases from non-cases make the K10 and K6 attractive for use in general-purpose health surveys. The scales are already being used in annual government health surveys in the US and Canada as well as in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Routine inclusion of either the K10 or K6 in clinical studies would create an important, and heretofore missing, crosswalk between community and clinical epidemiology.
Similar articles
- Screening for serious mental illness in the general population.Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, Epstein JF, Gfroerer JC, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Normand SL, Manderscheid RW, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM.Kessler RC, et al.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003.PMID:12578436
- The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being.Furukawa TA, Kessler RC, Slade T, Andrews G.Furukawa TA, et al.Psychol Med. 2003 Feb;33(2):357-62. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702006700.Psychol Med. 2003.PMID:12622315
- Do they actually work across borders? Evaluation of two measures of psychological distress as screening instruments in a non Anglo-Saxon country.Carrà G, Sciarini P, Segagni-Lusignani G, Clerici M, Montomoli C, Kessler RC.Carrà G, et al.Eur Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;26(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.04.008.Eur Psychiatry. 2011.PMID:20620023
- The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants.Cornelius BL, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ, Brouwer S.Cornelius BL, et al.BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 12;13:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-128.BMC Public Health. 2013.PMID:23402478Free PMC article.
- [Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].Renou S, Hergueta T, Flament M, Mouren-Simeoni MC, Lecrubier Y.Renou S, et al.Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95422-x.Encephale. 2004.PMID:15107714Review.French.
Cited by
- Norwegian and Swedish value sets for the EORTC QLU-C10D utility instrument.Rohde G, Lehmann J, Pilz MJ, Rojas-Concha L, Holzner B, King MT, Norman R, Kemmler G; EORTC Quality of Life Group.Rohde G, et al.Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):429-443. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03824-8. Epub 2024 Nov 5.Qual Life Res. 2025.PMID:39499479Free PMC article.
- The structure of psychopathology: toward an expanded quantitative empirical model.Wright AG, Krueger RF, Hobbs MJ, Markon KE, Eaton NR, Slade T.Wright AG, et al.J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Feb;122(1):281-94. doi: 10.1037/a0030133. Epub 2012 Oct 15.J Abnorm Psychol. 2013.PMID:23067258Free PMC article.
- Shift-Work Schedule Intervention for Extending Restart Breaks after Consecutive Night Shifts: A Non-randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study.Kubo T, Matsumoto S, Izawa S, Ikeda H, Nishimura Y, Kawakami S, Tamaki M, Masuda S.Kubo T, et al.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 15;19(22):15042. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215042.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022.PMID:36429761Free PMC article.Clinical Trial.
- Health determinants among refugees in Austria and Germany: A propensity-matched comparative study for Syrian, Afghan, and Iraqi refugees.Georges D, Buber-Ennser I, Rengs B, Kohlenberger J, Doblhammer G.Georges D, et al.PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250821. eCollection 2021.PLoS One. 2021.PMID:33909696Free PMC article.
- Do changes in neighborhood social context mediate the effects of the moving to opportunity experiment on adolescent mental health?Schmidt NM, Nguyen QC, Kehm R, Osypuk TL.Schmidt NM, et al.Health Place. 2020 May;63:102331. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102331. Epub 2020 Apr 13.Health Place. 2020.PMID:32543421Free PMC article.Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials