Cooperation, control, and concession in meerkat groups
- PMID:11161200
- DOI: 10.1126/science.291.5503.478
Cooperation, control, and concession in meerkat groups
Abstract
"Limited control" models of reproductive skew in cooperative societies suggest that the frequency of breeding by subordinates is determined by the outcome of power struggles with dominants. In contrast, "optimal skew" models suggest that dominants have full control of subordinate reproduction and allow subordinates to breed only when this serves to retain subordinates' assistance with rearing dominants' own litters. The results of our 7-year field study of cooperative meerkats, Suricata suricatta, support the predictions of limited control models and provide no indication that dominant females grant reproductive concessions to subordinates to retain their assistance with future breeding attempts.
Comment in
- Behavioral ecology. Dividing up the kids.Koenig WD, Haydock J.Koenig WD, et al.Science. 2001 Jan 19;291(5503):442-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1058250.Science. 2001.PMID:11228140No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Infanticide by subordinates influences reproductive sharing in cooperatively breeding meerkats.Young AJ, Clutton-Brock T.Young AJ, et al.Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 22;2(3):385-7. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0463.Biol Lett. 2006.PMID:17148410Free PMC article.
- Hormonal correlates of dominance in meerkats (Suricata suricatta).Carlson AA, Young AJ, Russell AF, Bennett NC, McNeilly AS, Clutton-Brock T.Carlson AA, et al.Horm Behav. 2004 Aug;46(2):141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.01.009.Horm Behav. 2004.PMID:15256303
- Determinants of reproductive success in dominant female meerkats.Hodge SJ, Manica A, Flower TP, Clutton-Brock TH.Hodge SJ, et al.J Anim Ecol. 2008 Jan;77(1):92-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01318.x. Epub 2007 Nov 21.J Anim Ecol. 2008.PMID:18031526
- Integrating cooperative breeding into theoretical concepts of cooperation.Bergmüller R, Johnstone RA, Russell AF, Bshary R.Bergmüller R, et al.Behav Processes. 2007 Oct;76(2):61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.07.001. Epub 2007 Jul 10.Behav Processes. 2007.PMID:17703898Review.
- Reproductive skew in female common marmosets: what can proximate mechanisms tell us about ultimate causes?Saltzman W, Digby LJ, Abbott DH.Saltzman W, et al.Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 7;276(1656):389-99. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1374.Proc Biol Sci. 2009.PMID:18945663Free PMC article.Review.
Cited by
- Who infects whom? Social networks and tuberculosis transmission in wild meerkats.Drewe JA.Drewe JA.Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 22;277(1681):633-42. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1775. Epub 2009 Nov 4.Proc Biol Sci. 2010.PMID:19889705Free PMC article.
- Space and rank: infants expect agents in higher position to be socially dominant.Meng X, Nakawake Y, Nitta H, Hashiya K, Moriguchi Y.Meng X, et al.Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Oct 9;286(1912):20191674. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1674. Epub 2019 Oct 9.Proc Biol Sci. 2019.PMID:31594505Free PMC article.
- Helpers increase the reproductive potential of offspring in cooperative meerkats.Russell AF, Young AJ, Spong G, Jordan NR, Clutton-Brock TH.Russell AF, et al.Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 22;274(1609):513-20. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3698.Proc Biol Sci. 2007.PMID:17476771Free PMC article.
- Indirect evolution of social fitness inequalities and facultative social exploitation.Nair RR, Fiegna F, Velicer GJ.Nair RR, et al.Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Mar 28;285(1875):20180054. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0054.Proc Biol Sci. 2018.PMID:29593113Free PMC article.
- Reproductive inequality among males in the genusPan.Mouginot M, Cheng L, Wilson ML, Feldblum JT, Städele V, Wroblewski EE, Vigilant L, Hahn BH, Li Y, Gilby IC, Pusey AE, Surbeck M.Mouginot M, et al.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Aug 14;378(1883):20220301. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0301. Epub 2023 Jun 26.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023.PMID:37381849Free PMC article.Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources