Episiotomy for vaginal birth
- PMID:10796120
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081
Episiotomy for vaginal birth
Abstract
Background: Episiotomy is done to prevent severe perineal tears, but its routine use has been questioned. The relative effects of midline compared with midlateral episiotomy are unclear.
Objectives: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of restrictive use of episiotomy compared with routine episiotomy during vaginal birth.
Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register.
Selection criteria: Randomised trials comparing restrictive use of episiotomy with routine use of episiotomy; restrictive use of mediolateral episiotomy versus routine mediolateral episiotomy; restrictive use of midline episiotomy versus routine midline episiotomy; and use of midline episiotomy versus mediolateral episiotomy.
Data collection and analysis: Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by two reviewers.
Main results: Six studies were included. In the routine episiotomy group, 72.7% (1752/2409) of women had episiotomies, while the rate in the restrictive episiotomy group was 27.6% (673/2441). Compared with routine use, restrictive episiotomy involved less posterior perineal trauma (relative risk 0. 88, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.92), less suturing (relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.77) and fewer healing complications (relative risk 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 0.85). Restrictive episiotomy was associated with more anterior perineal trauma (relative risk 1.79, 95% 1.55 to 2.07). There was no difference in severe vaginal or perineal trauma (relative risk 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.50); dyspareunia (relative risk 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.16); urinary incontinence (relative risk 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.20) or several pain measures. Results for restrictive versus routine mediolateral versus midline episiotomy were similar to the overall comparison.
Reviewer's conclusions: Restrictive episiotomy policies appear to have a number of benefits compared to routine episiotomy policies. There is less posterior perineal trauma, less suturing and fewer complications, no difference for most pain measures and severe vaginal or perineal trauma, but there was an increased risk of anterior perineal trauma with restrictive episiotomy.
Similar articles
- Episiotomy for vaginal birth.Carroli G, Mignini L.Carroli G, et al.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009.Update in:Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 08;2:CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3.PMID:19160176Free PMC article.Updated.Review.
- Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears.Kettle C, Hills RK, Ismail KM.Kettle C, et al.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD000947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000947.pub2.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007.Update in:Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD000947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000947.pub3.PMID:17943747Updated.Review.
- Secondary suturing compared to non-suturing for broken down perineal wounds following childbirth.Dudley LM, Kettle C, Ismail KM.Dudley LM, et al.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 25;(9):CD008977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008977.pub2.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013.PMID:24065561Review.
- Restrictive versus routine episiotomy among Southeast Asian term pregnancies: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Sangkomkamhang U, Kongwattanakul K, Kietpeerakool C, Thinkhamrop J, Wannasiri P, Khunpradit S, Thepsuthamarat K, Jampathong N, Lumbiganon P.Sangkomkamhang U, et al.BJOG. 2020 Feb;127(3):397-403. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15982. Epub 2019 Nov 20.BJOG. 2020.PMID:31749273Clinical Trial.
- Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma.Beckmann MM, Garrett AJ.Beckmann MM, et al.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD005123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005123.pub2.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006.Update in:Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4):CD005123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005123.pub3.PMID:16437520Updated.Review.
Cited by
- Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial.M Amorim M, Coutinho IC, Melo I, Katz L.M Amorim M, et al.Reprod Health. 2017 Apr 24;14(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0315-4.Reprod Health. 2017.PMID:28438209Free PMC article.Clinical Trial.
- Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma.Beckmann MM, Stock OM.Beckmann MM, et al.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD005123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005123.pub3.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013.PMID:23633325Free PMC article.Review.
- Postpartum period: three distinct but continuous phases.Romano M, Cacciatore A, Giordano R, La Rosa B.Romano M, et al.J Prenat Med. 2010 Apr;4(2):22-5.J Prenat Med. 2010.PMID:22439056Free PMC article.
- Influence of training in the use and generation of evidence on episiotomy practice and perineal trauma.Ho JJ, Pattanittum P, Japaraj RP, Turner T, Swadpanich U, Crowther CA; SEA-ORCHID Study Group.Ho JJ, et al.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Oct;111(1):13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.04.035. Epub 2010 Jul 3.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010.PMID:20598690Free PMC article.
- Use of evidence-based practices in pregnancy and childbirth: South East Asia Optimising Reproductive and Child Health in Developing Countries project.SEA-ORCHID Study Group; Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, McDonald SJ, Henderson-Smart DJ, Green S, Crowther CA.SEA-ORCHID Study Group, et al.PLoS One. 2008 Jul 9;3(7):e2646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002646.PLoS One. 2008.PMID:18612381Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources