Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

HighWire full text link HighWire Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

.1998 Mar;7(1):5-11.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.1.5.

Description of local adaptation of national guidelines and of active feedback for rationalising preoperative screening in patients at low risk from anaesthetics in a French university hospital

Affiliations

Description of local adaptation of national guidelines and of active feedback for rationalising preoperative screening in patients at low risk from anaesthetics in a French university hospital

E Capdenat Saint-Martin et al. Qual Health Care.1998 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the effect of local adaptation of national guidelines combined with active feedback and organisational analysis on the ordering of preoperative investigations for patients at low risk from anaesthetics.

Design: Assessment of preoperative tests ordered over one month, before and after local adaptation of guidelines and feedback of results, combined with an organisational analysis.

Setting: Motivated anaesthetists in 15 surgical wards of Bordeaux University Hospital, Region Aquitain, France.

Subjects: 42 anaesthetists, 60 surgeons, and their teams.

Main outcome measures: Number and type of preoperative tests ordered in June 1993 and 1994, and the estimated savings.

Results: Of 536 patients at low risk from anaesthetics studied in 1993 before the intervention 80% had at least one preoperative test. Most (70%) tests were ordered by anaesthetists. Twice the number of preoperative tests were ordered than recommended by national guidelines. Organisational analysis indicated lack of organised consultations and communication within teams. Changes implemented included scheduling of anaesthetic consultations; regular formal multidisciplinary meetings for all staff; preoperative ordering decision charts. Of 516 low risk patients studied in 1994 after the intervention only 48% had one or more preoperative tests ordered (p < 0.05). Estimated mean (SD) saving for one year if changes were applied to all patients at low risk from anaesthesia in the hospital 3.04 (1.23) mFF.

Conclusions: A sharp decrease in tests ordered in low risk patients was found. The likely cause was the package of changes that included local adaptation of national guidelines, feedback, and organisational change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. JAMA. 1985 Jun 28;253(24):3576-81 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1986 Jan 18;1(8473):139-41 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1983 Aug 20;2(8347):446-8 - PubMed
    1. Int J Qual Health Care. 1997 Jun;9(3):221-3 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1996 Mar 23;312(7033):760-2 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
HighWire full text link HighWire Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp