Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
                                  NCBI home page
Search in PMCSearch
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logo
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 24.

The dynamic genome ofHydra

Jarrod A Chapman1,*,Ewen F Kirkness2,*,Oleg Simakov3,4,*,Steven E Hampson5,,Therese Mitros4,Therese Weinmaier6,Thomas Rattei6,Prakash G Balasubramanian3,Jon Borman2,Dana Busam2,Kathryn Disbennett2,Cynthia Pfannkoch2,Nadezhda Sumin2,Granger G Sutton2,Lakshmi Devi Viswanathan2,Brian Walenz2,David M Goodstein1,Uffe Hellsten1,Takeshi Kawashima4,Simon E Prochnik1,Nicholas H Putnam1,4,,Shengquiang Shu1,Bruce Blumberg7,8,Catherine E Dana8,9,Lydia Gee7,8,Dennis F Kibler5,Lee Law7,8,Dirk Lindgens7,8,Daniel E Martinez10,Jisong Peng7,8,Philip A Wigge11,,Bianca Bertulat3,Corina Guder3,Yukio Nakamura3,Suat Ozbek3,Hiroshi Watanabe3,Konstantin Khalturin12,Georg Hemmrich12,André Franke12,René Augustin12,Sebastian Fraune12,Eisuke Hayakawa13,Shiho Hayakawa13,Mamiko Hirose13,Jung Shan Hwang13,Kazuho Ikeo13,Chiemi Nishimiya-Fujisawa13,Atshushi Ogura13,,Toshio Takahashi14,Patrick R H Steinmetz15,Xiaoming Zhang16,Roland Aufschnaiter17,Marie-Kristin Eder17,Anne-Kathrin Gorny17,,Willi Salvenmoser17,Alysha M Heimberg18,Benjamin M Wheeler19,Kevin J Peterson18,Angelika Böttger20,Patrick Tischler6,Alexander Wolf20,Takashi Gojobori13,Karin A Remington2,,Robert L Strausberg2,J Craig Venter2,Ulrich Technau15,Bert Hobmayer17,Thomas C G Bosch12,Thomas W Holstein3,Toshitaka Fujisawa13,Hans R Bode7,8,Charles N David20,Daniel S Rokhsar1,4,Robert E Steele8,9
1US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA
2The J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA
3Institute of Zoology, Department of Molecular Evolution and Genomics, University of Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
4Center for Integrative Genomics, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
5Department of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-3435, USA
6Department of Genome-Oriented Bioinformatics, Technische Universität München, D-85354 Freising, Germany
7Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-2275, USA
8Developmental Biology Center, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-2275, USA
9Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-1700, USA
10Department of Biology, Pomona College, Claremont, California 91711, USA
11The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA
12Zoologisches Institüt, Christian-Albrechts-University, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
13National Institute of Genetics, Yata 1, 111, Mishima 411-8540, Japan
14Suntory Institute for Bioorganic Research, Osaka 618-8503, Japan
15Department of Molecular Evolution and Development, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
16Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA
17Institute of Zoology and Center for Molecular Biosciences, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
18Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA
19Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
20Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, D-82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.E.S. (resteele@uci.edu) or D.S.R. (dsrokhsar@gmail.com)

Present addresses: Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK (P.A.W.); Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany (A.-K.G.); Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-6200, USA (K.A.R.); Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77251-1892, USA (N.H.P.); Ochadai Academic Production, Ochanomizu University, Ohtsuka, Bunkyo, 1128610 Tokyo, Japan (A.O.).

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Deceased.

Issue date 2010 Mar 25.

© 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

Reprints and permissions information is available atwww.nature.com/reprints. This paper is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike licence, and is freely available to all readers atwww.nature.com/nature.

PMCID: PMC4479502  NIHMSID: NIHMS701200  PMID:20228792
The publisher's version of this article is available atNature

Abstract

The freshwater cnidarianHydra was first described in 17021 and has been the object of study for 300 years. Experimental studies ofHydra between 1736 and 1744 culminated in the discovery of asexual reproduction of an animal by budding, the first description of regeneration in an animal, and successful transplantation of tissue between animals2. Today,Hydra is an important model for studies of axial patterning3, stem cell biology4 and regeneration5. Here we report the genome ofHydra magnipapillata and compare it to the genomes of the anthozoanNematostella vectensis6 and other animals. TheHydra genome has been shaped by bursts of transposable element expansion, horizontal gene transfer,trans-splicing, and simplification of gene structure and gene content that parallel simplification of theHydra life cycle. We also report the sequence of the genome of a novel bacterium stably associated withH. magnipapillata. Comparisons of theHydra genome to the genomes of other animals shed light on the evolution of epithelia, contractile tissues, developmentally regulated transcription factors, the Spemann–Mangold organizer, pluripotency genes and the neuromuscular junction.


The genomic basis of cnidarian evolution has so far been viewed from the perspective of an anthozoan, the sea anemoneNematostella vectensis6.Hydra is a medusozoan that diverged from anthozoans at least 540 millions year ago. Features ofHydra andNematostella are compared inSupplementary Table 1. We generated draft assemblies of theHydra magnipapillata genome using a whole-genome shotgun approach (Supplementary Information sections 1–3 and Supplementary Figs 1–3). TheHydra genome is (A+T)-rich (71% A+T), and includes ~57% transposable elements (see below). Although the sequenced strain reproduces clonally in the laboratory by asexual budding, it is diploid with substantial heterozygosity (~0.7% single nucleotide polymorphism between alleles), which we find is distributed along the genome as expected if it were drawn from a randomly mating population (Supplementary Information section 3). These features complicate shotgun sequencing and assembly. Two complementary assemblies (CA and RP) were generated (Supplementary Information section 3) and deposited in GenBank. The CA assembly (1.5 gigabases (Gb)) has contig and scaffold N50 values of 12.8 kilobases (kb) and 63.4 kb, respectively. The RP assembly (1.0 Gb) has a contig N50 length of 9.7 kb and a scaffold N50 length of 92.5 kb. The CA assembly gives an estimated non-redundant genome size of 1.05 Gb. The RP assembly gives an estimated non-redundant genome size of 0.9Gb (seeSupplementary Information section 3 for a discussion of genome size calculations). For analysis, we chose the assembly that minimized sequence redundancy owing to the separate assembly of haplotypes (seeSupplementary Information section 3 for further discussion). Approximately 99% of knownHydra genes are found in both assemblies, attesting to their completeness with respect to protein-coding genes.

Although the presentHydra assembly is too fragmented for a chromosome-scale analysis, we found evidence for synteny with other metazoans. Of the 33 longest gene-richHydra scaffolds (that is, those containing genes from at least 10Hydra/Nematostella orthologue groups), 15 (45%) were significantly enriched (P < 0.01) for genes from specific eumetazoan linkage groups6, indicating that vestiges of the ancestral eumetazoan genome organization persist inHydra. This is in contrast to the highly diverged genomes ofDrosophila andCaenorhabditis elegans, which show no synteny with other metazoans by these methods.

We estimate that theHydra genome contains ~20,000 bona fide protein-coding genes (excluding transposable elements), based on expressed sequence tags (ESTs), homology andab initio gene prediction (Supplementary Information section 6). The amino acid substitution rate in theHydra lineage is enhanced relative to theNematostella lineage; the sequence divergence between aHydra peptide and itshuman orthologue is typically greater than the sequence divergence betweenNematostella and human (Supplementary Information section 8 and Supplementary Fig. 4) as expected based on the longer branch leading toHydra in peptide-based phylogenies6. Similarly, the rate of intron loss has been higher in theHydra lineage; we find that 22%(126 out of 575) of the introns shared byNematostella and human in well-aligned coding regions have been lost inHydra. Conversely, only 6% (28 out of 476) of the introns shared byHydra and human are absent inNematostella.

Transposable elements make up ~57% of theHydra genome and represent over 500 different families (Supplementary Information section 9). The most abundant element, comprising ~15% of the genome (Fig. 1 andSupplementary Table 3), is a non-long-terminal-repeat (non-LTR) retroelement of the chicken repeat 1 (CR1) family. To our knowledge, elements of this family are more abundant in theHydra genome than in any other sequenced animal genome (in comparison, the CR1 family occupies only ~1%of theNematostella assembly and 3% of the chicken assembly). This retrotransposon is still active inHydra, as indicated by its representation in 105 ESTs. We also found 789 cases of intronless genes that were derived recently from multi-exon genes, most probably through retrotransposition. DNA transposons (predominantly ‘cut-and-paste’ elements of the mariner, Transib and hAT (hobo-Ac-Tam3) types) occupy ~20% of both theHydra andNematostella genomes, and are also active inHydra based on the presence of ESTs.

Figure 1. Dynamics of transposable element expansion inHydra reveals several periods of transposon activity.

Figure 1

a, The top panel shows phylogenetic relationships between fourHydra species based on ESTs (using Nei-Gojobori synonymous substitution rates; seeSupplementary Fig. 8). The bottom panel shows the fraction of the genome that is occupied by a specific repeat class at a given divergence from the repeat consensus generated by the ReAS (recovery of ancestral sequences) algorithm (seeSupplementary Information section 9). Substitution levels are corrected for multiple substitutions using the Jukes–Cantor formulaK = −3/4ln(1−i4/3), wherei is per cent dissimilarity on the nucleotide level from the repeat consensus. This substitution level for transposons is equivalent to Nei-Gojobori synonymous substitution rates in the ESTs. Three element expansions are inferred, the most distinct are the most ancient at ~0.4 and the most recent at 0.05 divergence levels. The middle expansion at about ~0.2 is not well synchronized and is more clearly seen for individual element classes inSupplementary Figs 5 and 6.b, c, Example of periods of activity of a singleHydra CR1 retrotransposon family (b) and the maximum likelihood phylogeny of the family (c).

Timing of transposable element activity using sequence divergence of extant copies reveals at least three periods of element expansion (at ~5%, ~20% and ~40% nucleotide substitutions;Fig. 1 andSupplementary Figs 5 and 6). In marked contrast, comparable expansions are absent from theNematostella genome (Supplementary Fig. 7). Most individualHydra transposable element families show discrete bursts of expansion (Fig. 1b, c) that are possibly associated with population bottlenecks7. The correspondence between speciation times in the genusHydra and the timing of transposon activity may have been associated with the approximately threefold increase in genome size (Fig. 1a) inH. magnipapillata,H. vulgaris andH. oligactis relative toH. viridissima (380 megabases (Mb))8.

Addition of short RNA leader sequences to the 5′ ends of messenger RNAs bytrans-splicing occurs in a subset of metazoans and unicellular eukaryotes9. Transcripts from at least one-third of EST-supported genes inHydra undergotrans-spliced leader addition (Supplementary Information section 10).Hydra has multiple spliced leader genes (Supplementary Table 9), and a given transcript may betrans-spliced with several different spliced leaders. Notably,trans-splicing is absent fromNematostella (Supplementary Information section 10). It now seems likely thattrans-splicing has evolved multiple times independently9.

Trans-splicing occurs inHydra viridissima (N. A. Stover and R.E.S., unpublished data; GenBank accession numberDQ092354) and in several other hydrozoans (Supplementary Table 10), and may be an ancestral feature of the class. Spliced leader addition gives a eukaryotic cell the opportunity to combine genes into operons, the multi-cistronic transcripts of which can be resolved into individual mRNAs bytrans-splicing. We found 32 potentialHydra operons (Supplementary Information section 10, Supplementary Table 11 and Supplementary Fig. 9), but no obvious evidence for functional relationships between genes in these operons.

Bacteria are stably associated withHydra10. Electron micrographs reveal bacterial cells underneath the glycocalyx, the coat that overlies the apical surface of the ectodermal epithelial layer ofHydra (Supplementary Fig. 10). Our assembly yielded eight large putative bacterial scaffolds as evidenced by: (1) high G+C content (in contrast to the low G+C content of theHydra genome); (2) no high-copy repeat sequences typical ofHydra scaffolds; and (3) closely spaced single-exon open reading frames with best hits to bacterial genes (Supplementary Information section 11, Supplementary Fig. 11 and Supplementary Table 12). These scaffolds span a total of 4Mb encoding 3,782 single-exon genes and represent an estimated 98% of the bacterial chromosome. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA (Supplementary Fig. 12) and conserved clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COGs) indicate that this bacterium is a novelCurvibacter species belonging to the family Comamonadaceae (order Burkholderiales)11. About 60% of annotatedCurvibacter sp. genes have an orthologue in another species of Comamonadaceae (Supplementary Table 13). Notably, theCurvibacter sp. genome encodes nine different ABC sugar transporters, compared to only one or two in other species of Comamonadaceae (Supplementary Table 14), possibly reflecting an adaptation to life in association withHydra.

Non-metazoan genes among cnidarian ESTs have been reported previously12, and we have now found further examples of such genes in theHydra genome assembly. These genes are candidates for horizontal gene transfer (HGT) (Supplementary Information section 12). Seventy-oneHydra gene models showed closer relationships to bacterial genes than to metazoan genes based on sequence similarity and phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Table 15). Of these, 51 have no blast hits to other metazoans, except in a few cases toNematostella. Potential donors of these HGT candidates are widely distributed among different bacterial phyla (Supplementary Table 15) and show no enrichment for close relatives ofCurvibacter. Approximately 70% of the HGT candidates have EST support, and transcripts from 30% of the genes have spliced leaders, indicating unambiguously that they are derived fromHydra and not from associated bacteria (Supplementary Table 15). The HGT candidates generally have fewer introns thanHydra genes and nearly one-half are single-exon genes (Supplementary Fig. 14), as expected if they were relatively recently acquired byHydra. A number of the HGT candidates encode sugar-modifying enzymes. Three genes encode enzymes in the branch of the bacterial lipopolysaccharide synthesis pathway that leads to formation of the activated heptose precursor of the lipopolysaccharide inner core (Supplementary Fig. 13). This pathway could modify endogenous glycoproteins or proteoglycans inHydra.

We also identified 90 transposable elements that were potentially horizontally transferred into theHydra genome. These elements have expanded recently (less than 10% nucleotide divergence from their consensus) and have no older copies in the genome. The most frequent element class consists of hAT transposons with 34 different families, although all major classes of transposable element (DNA transposon, LTR and non-LTR elements) are represented. Transposable elements have been shown previously to be horizontally transferred inmetazoans13.

We identified 51 unique non-tRNA/non-rRNA transcripts that correspond to putative non-coding RNA genes based on 454 sequencing of short transcripts fromHydra (Supplementary Information section 13 and Supplementary Table 16). At least 17 of these are microRNAs (miRNAs), compared to 40 identified miRNAs inNematostella14. Surprisingly, only a single miRNA gene in the available data sets,miR-2022, is common to both cnidarian species.

Hox and ParaHox gene families arose from a megacluster that included a number of other homeobox genes (for example, NK genes)15. With the exception of engrailed, descendants of all of the classes of homeobox genes in the megacluster are found inNematostella16,17.Hydra is missing a substantial fraction of megacluster descendants16, indicating secondary loss. For example, theeve andemx genes are absent fromHydra, although they are present inNematostella and several hydrozoans (Supplementary Table 17). The loss of these genes fromHydra is therefore recent in relation to the diversification of hydrozoans. These genes are expressed in a cell-type-specific manner in larvae and adults ofNematostella17 andHydractinia18; it is intriguing that the loss of these genes correlates with the absence of a larval stage inHydra (Supplementary Table 17). The absence of these genes inHydra indicates that despite their near-universal presence in animals, it is possible to construct a metazoan without either of them. In addition to the loss ofemx andeve genes,Hydra has undergone several other marked gene losses; for example, it lacks fluorescent protein genes and key circadian rhythm genes (Supplementary Information section 14).

All major bilaterian signalling pathways, including Wnt, transforming growth factor-β, Hedgehog, receptor tyrosine kinase and Notch, are present inHydra andNematostella. An important signalling centre inHydra is the head organizer, which uses the Wnt signalling pathway to establish positional values along the body column19,20. The head organizer, which is located at the apical tip of the adult polyp, is derived from the gastrula blastopore in cnidarians. A transplanted head organizer has the capacity to induce axis formation21, similar to the Spemann–Mangold organizer inXenopus. Orthologues of a number of genes known to act in the Spemann–Mangold organizer inXenopus are present in theHydra andNematostella genomes. Moreover, several of the secreted signalling molecules and transcription factors encoded by these genes are expressed specifically in theHydra head organizer and the blastopore organizer in theNematostella gastrula (Supplementary Information section 15 and Supplementary Table 18). Thus, theHydra head organizer and theXenopus Spemann–Mangold organizer may share common descent from an organizer in the ancestor of cnidarians and bilaterians.

The extracellular portions of twoHydra receptor tyrosine kinases22,23 contain a novel protein domain, sweet tooth (SWT). The SWT domain is also present in ESTs from the hydrozoanClytia, but is absent from all other sequenced genomes, including that ofNematostella (Supplementary Fig. 15). SWT is among the most abundant protein domains encoded in theHydra genome. The SWT domain is present in one or more copies in predicted secreted proteins. Given its presence in receptors and secreted proteins, we deduce that the SWT domain defines a large, diverse and novel set of signalling proteins.

Hydra contains a pluripotent stem cell type that gives rise to germ cells, nerve cells, nematocytes and secretory cells4. Of the five genes that have been shown to induce pluripotency in differentiated somatic cells of mammals (Myc,Nanog,Klf4,Oct4 andSox2)24, homologues of three (Nanog,Klf4 andOct4) are clearly not present in theHydra genome.Hydra has fourMyc homologues. There are two members of the Sox B group inHydra. The Sox B group includesSox2, but the evolutionary relationship between vertebrateSox2 genes andHydra Sox B genes is not clear25. We conclude that the stem cell genetic network inHydra probably has an evolutionary origin independent from the network used in mammalian stem cells. Studies of diverse cnidarians support this scenario (seeSupplementary Information section 14 for details).

Hydra’s shape is formed by epitheliomuscular cells, a cell type unique to cnidarians. A survey of genes that encode muscle structural and regulatory proteins inHydra andNematostella reveals a conserved eumetazoan core actin-myosin contractile machinery shared with bilaterians (Supplementary Table 19). Both cnidarians, however, lack crucial, specific regulators associated with vertebrate striated (troponin complex) or smooth muscles (caldesmon), indicating that these specializations arose after the cnidarian–bilaterian split.Hydra also shows secondary simplifications relative toNematostella, which has a greater degree of muscle-cell-type specialization, including specialized retractor muscle cells.Hydra lacks several components of the dystroglycan complex (α/ε-sarcoglycan and β-sarcoglycan, α/β-dystroglycan and γ-syntrophin), which may lead to a less robust tethering of actin to the cell membrane than inNematostella. Similarly, the absence of a bona fide myosin light chain kinase and phosphatase inHydra indicates a divergence or loss of regulation by myosin regulatory light chain phosphorylation. The greater degree of muscle-cell-type specialization inNematostella is also mirrored in the higher number of myosin light chain genes in this species. Thus, even among cnidarians, we see substantial variation in muscle-associated components superimposed on the eumetazoan core, with theHydra muscular system representing a secondary simplification from a more complex cnidarian ancestor.

Ultrastructural studies show that nerve cells inHydra form synapses on contractile epitheliomuscular cells (Fig. 2a), and that these synapses contain dense core vesicles, paramembranous densities and cleft filaments26 similar to canonical neuromuscular junctions in bilaterians. Several components of the bilaterian neuromuscular junction (choline transporter, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor) are encoded in theHydra genome (Supplementary Information section 16 and Supplementary Table 20) and their expression is consistent with a role in neuromuscular signalling (Supplementary Figs 16 and 17). Other components, however, are found only in a possibly primitive form (putative carnitine acetyltransferases that lack the diagnostic residues for choline selectivity), and some components are absent (the vesicular acetylcholine transporter;Fig. 2b). Together, these data indicate that a canonical bilaterian neuromuscular junction was probably not present in the last common ancestor of cnidarians and bilaterians.Hydra is known to use neuropeptides for the control of behaviour27, and these may be contained in the dense-core vesicles seen atHydra synapses.

Figure 2. The neuromuscular junction inHydra.

Figure 2

a, Electron micrograph of a nerve synapsing on aHydra epitheliomuscular cell. emc, epitheliomuscular cell; nv, nerve cell. Three vesicles are located in the nerve cell at the site of contact with the epitheliomuscular cell. Scale bar, 200 nm.b, Schematic diagram of a canonical neuromuscular junction. Yellow indicates presence inHydra. Choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) is shown in red because it is not clear whetherHydra has an enzyme that prefers choline (Ch) as a substrate. Acetylcholine (ACh) molecules are shown as blue circles. The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is shown in the open state with acetylcholine bound (left), and in the closed state in the absence of bound acetylcholine (right). AChE, acetylcholinesterase; ChT, choline transporter; MuSK, muscle-specific kinase; VAChT, vesicular acetylcholine transporter.

InHydra andNematostella, epitheliomuscular cells have an apical junctional belt in the form of a septate junction, clear apical–basal polarity, and hemidesmosome-like contact sites with the extracellular matrix (mesoglea) on their basal surface (Fig. 3a). TheHydra andNematostella genomes encode almost all of the proteins known from bilaterians to be involved in the establishment of cell–cell and cell–substrate contacts (Fig. 3b andSupplementary Fig. 18). This indicates that the common cnidarian–bilaterian ancestor possessed a genetic inventory for the formation of all types of eumetazoan cell–cell and cell–substrate junctions. The presence of innexin genes in theHydra28 andNematostella genomes (Fig. 3b andSupplementary Fig. 19) combined with the lack of connexin genes in non-chordate genomes clearly support the view that innexin-based gap junctions are an ancestral eumetazoan feature, and that gap junctions formed by connexins29 arose later in animal evolution. Similarly, the lack of occludin genes in cnidarians and other non-chordates (Fig. 4) indicates that occludins and their function in tight junction formation first arose in the deuterostome lineage.

Figure 3.Hydra cell junctions.

Figure 3

a, Schematic diagram of the positions of cell–cell and cell–matrix contacts inHydra epitheliomuscular cells. Septate junction, red; gap junctions, green; spot desmosomes, blue; hemidesmosome-like cell–matrix contact, yellow. Ecto, ectodermal cell; Endo, endodermal cell; M, mesoglea. For simplicity the nervous system has been omitted.b–e, Electron micrographs of cell–cell and cell–matrix contacts inHydra.b, Apical septate junction.c, Spot desmosome between basal muscle processes.d, Gap junction in the lateral cell membrane.e, Hemidesmosome-like cell–mesoglea contact site. Scale bars inb–e indicate 100 nm.f, Phylogenetic distribution of cell–cell and cell–substrate contact proteins. A filled box indicates the presence of an orthologue from the corresponding protein family as identified by SMART/Pfam analysis or conserved cysteine patterns. SeeSupplementary Information section 17 and Supplementary Table 21 for details.

Although some gene families associated with cell–cell and cell– substrate interactions are also found in placozoans, demosponges and choanoflagellates, it is important to note that there are cell-adhesion-associated protein domains specific to cnidarians and bilaterians. For example,Hydra andNematostella have classic cadherins exhibiting a highly conserved, bilaterian-type cytoplasmic (CCD) domain(Fig. 3b andSupplementary Fig. 18) that is able to interact with β- and p120/δ-catenin (Supplementary Information section 17). So far, only one sponge cadherin gene that encodes a cytoplasmic domain with weak similarity to the eumetazoan CCD domain has been detected.

The sequencing of theHydra genome has revealed unexpected relationships between the genetic makeup of the animal and its biology. The genes encoding the proteins that form epithelial junctions in bilaterians are present inHydra yet there are obvious differences in structures of the junctional complexes. Despite the morphological similarity of neuromuscular junctions in bilaterians andHydra, several of the key genes required to make this junction in bilaterians are absent fromHydra.Hydra has a complete set of muscle genes but lacks mesoderm and forms muscles only in epithelial cells. Most of the genes required for stem cell pluripotency in mammals are absent fromHydra, yetHydra has a multipotent stem cell system that functions similarly to stem cell systems in bilaterians. The availability of theHydra genome sequence and methods to manipulate it30 provide an opportunity to understand how this remarkable animal evolved.

METHODS SUMMARY

The genome ofHydramagnipapillata strain 105was sequenced at the J. CraigVenter Institute using the whole genome shotgun approach. Two different assemblies were generated and deposited in GenBank (accession numbersABRM00000000 andACZU00000000). Complementary DNA libraries were prepared using standard methods and ESTs were generated at the National Institute of Genetics (Mishima, Japan) and the Genome Sequencing Center(Washington University, St Louis). ESTs have been deposited in the dbEST database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information. TheCurvibacter sp. genome sequence has been deposited in GenBank (accession numbersFN543101,FN543102,FN543103,FN543104,FN543105,FN543106,FN543107 andFN543108).

Supplementary Material

supplemental information

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to S. Clifton, R. Wilson and the EST sequencing group at the Genome Sequencing Center at the Washington University School of Medicine for their efforts in generating theHydra ESTs and to the National Science Foundation for its support of theHydra EST project (grant number IBN-0120591). Funding for the sequencing of theHydra genome was provided by the National Human Genome Research Institute. We thank J. Gerhart who, as co-chair of the National Human Genome Research Institute Working Group on Comparative Genome Evolution, advocated sequencing of theHydra genome. The septate junction electron micrograph inFig. 3 was provided by G. Rieger. K.J.P. thanks N. Margulis for technical assistance and the NSF for support (grant number DEB-0716960). U.T. was supported by the Austrian Science Fund and the Norwegian Research Council. B.H. was supported by Austrian Science Fund grants FWF P16685 and FWF P20734. D.S.R. was supported by R. Melmon and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. Work at the US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute was supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. T.F. and T.G. were supported by Grants-In-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. T.C.G.B. was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG SFB617-A1) and from the DFG Cluster of Excellence programs ‘The Future Ocean’ and ‘Inflammation at Interfaces’. T.W.H. was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft including SFB488-A12 and the DFG Cluster of Excellence program ‘CellNetworks’. Support for H.W. was provided by the TOYOBO Biotechnology Foundation and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. Support for A.B., B.B., C.G., C.N.D., H.W., P.G.B., S.O., T.F. (Mercator Professor) and Y.N. was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper atwww.nature.com/nature.

Author Contributions J.A.C., E.F.K., O.S., H.R.B., C.N.D., D.S.R. and R.E.S. directed the project and wrote the manuscript. E.F.K., K.A.R., R.L.S. and J.C.V. directed genome sequencing and assembly at JCVI. J.B., D.B., K.D., C.P., N.S., G.G.S., L.D.V. and B.W. were responsible for library construction, sequence production and genome assembly at JCVI. D.S.R., J.A.C., O.S., T.M., D.M.G., U.H., T.K., S.E.P., S.S. and N.H.P. carried out genome assembly and gene annotation at UC Berkeley. Construction of cDNA libraries and analysis of ESTs was carried out by H.R.B., R.E.S., D.F.K., S.E.H., L.G., D.L., L.L., J.P., B.B., P.A.W., T.F., C.N.-F., T.G., J.S.H., E.H., S.H., M.H., K.I., A.O., T.T., T.C.G.B., K.K., G.H., A.F., R.A., S.F., T.W.H., C.G., P.G.B., B.B., Y.N., S.O., H.W. and D.E.M. T.W., T.R., P.G.B., C.E.D., P.T. and C.N.D. carried out analysis of theCurvibacter genome and HGT candidate genes. A.M.H., B.M.W., O.S. and K.J.P. carried out the microRNA analyses. U.T., B.H., A.W., P.R.H.S., X.Z., R.A., M.-K.E., A.-K.G., W.S., T.F. and A.B. carried out analyses of genes involved in various biological processes. J.A.C., E.F.K. and O.S. are joint first authors.

Two different assemblies of theHydra magnipapillata strain 105 genome were generated and deposited in GenBank under accession numbersABRM00000000 andACZU00000000. TheCurvibacter sp. genome sequence has been deposited in GenBank under accession numbersFN543101,FN543102,FN543103,FN543104,FN543105,FN543106,FN543107 andFN543108.

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  • 1.van Leeuwenhoek A. In: The Collected Letters of Antoni van Leeuwenhoek. Palm LC, editor. XIV. Swets and Zeitlinger; 1996. pp. 169–173. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Trembley A. Mémoires, pour servir à l’historie d’un genre de polypes d’eau douce, à bras en forme de cornes. Jean and Herman Verbeek; 1744. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bode PM, Bode HR. In: Pattern Formation, A Primer in Developmental Biology. Malacinski GM, Bryant SV, editors. Macmillan; 1984. pp. 213–241. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.David CN, Murphy S. Characterization of interstitial stem cells in Hydra by cloning. Dev. Biol. 1977;58:372–383. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90098-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Holstein TW, Hobmayer E, Technau U. Cnidarians: an evolutionarily conserved model system for regeneration? Dev. Dyn. 2003;226:257–267. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.10227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Putnam NH, et al. Sea anemone genome reveals ancestral eumetazoan gene repertoire and genomic organization. Science. 2007;317:86–94. doi: 10.1126/science.1139158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lynch M. The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes. Nature Genet. 2007;8:803–813. doi: 10.1038/nrg2192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zacharias H, Anokhin B, Khalturin K, Bosch TCG. Genome sizes and chromosomes in the basal metazoan Hydra. Zoology. 2004;107:219–227. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2004.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Douris V, Telford MJ, Averof M. Evidence for multiple independent origins of trans-splicing in Metazoa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009 Nov 25; doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fraune S, Bosch TC. Long-term maintenance of species-specific bacterial microbiota in the basal metazoan Hydra. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:13146–13151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703375104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ding L, Yokota A. Proposals of Curvibacter gracilis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Herbaspirillum putei sp. nov. for bacterial strains isolated from well water and reclassification of [Pseudomonas] huttiensis, [Pseudomonas] lanceolata, [Aquaspirillum] delicatum and [Aquaspirillum] autotrophicum as Herbaspirillum huttiense comb. nov., Curvibacter lanceolatus comb. nov., Curvibacter delicatus comb. nov. and Herbaspirillum autotrophicum comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004;54:2223–2230. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02975-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Technau U, et al. Maintenance of ancestral complexity and non-metazoan genes in two basal cnidarians. Trends Genet. 2005;21:633–639. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pace JK, II, Gilbert C, Clark MS, Feschotte C. Repeated horizontal transfer of a DNA transposon in mammals and other tetrapods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:17023–17028. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806548105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Grimson A, et al. Early origins and evolution of microRNAs and Piwi-interacting RNAs in animals. Nature. 2008;455:1193–1197. doi: 10.1038/nature07415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Butts T, Holland PW, Ferrier DE. The urbilaterian Super-Hox cluster. Trends Genet. 2008;24:259–262. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chourrout D, et al. Minimal ProtoHox cluster inferred from bilaterian and cnidarian Hox complements. Nature. 2006;442:684–687. doi: 10.1038/nature04863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ryan JF, et al. Pre-bilaterian origins of the Hox cluster and the Hox code: evidence from the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis. PLoS One. 2007;2:e153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mokady O, Dick MH, Lackschewitz D, Schierwater B, Buss LW. Over one-half billion years of head conservation? Expression of an ems class gene in Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:3673–3678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hobmayer B, et al. WNT signalling molecules act in axis formation in the diploblastic metazoan Hydra. Nature. 2000;407:186–189. doi: 10.1038/35025063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Broun M, Gee L, Reinhardt B, Bode HR. Formation of the head organizer in hydra involves the canonical Wnt pathway. Development. 2005;132:2907–2916. doi: 10.1242/dev.01848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Browne E. The production of new hydranths in Hydra by the insertion of small grafts. J. Exp. Zool. 1909;7:1–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bridge DM, Stover NA, Steele RE. Expression of a novel receptor tyrosine kinase gene and a paired-like homeobox gene provides evidence of differences in patterning at the oral and aboral ends of hydra. Dev. Biol. 2000;220:253–262. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Reidling JC, Miller MA, Steele RE. Sweet Tooth, a novel receptor protein-tyrosine kinase with C-type lectin-like extracellular domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:10323–10330. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.14.10323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Feng B, Ng JH, Heng JC, Ng HH. Molecules that promote or enhance reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4:301–312. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jager M, Queinnec E, Houliston E, Manuel M. Expansion of the SOX gene family predated the emergence of the Bilateria. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006;39:468–477. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Westfall JA, Yamataka S, Enos PD. Ultrastructural evidence of polarized synapses in the nerve net of Hydra. J. Cell Biol. 1971;51:318–323. doi: 10.1083/jcb.51.1.318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Takahashi T, et al. Systematic isolation of peptide signal molecules regulating development in hydra: LWamide and PW families. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:1241–1246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alexopoulos H, et al. Evolution of gap junctions: the missing link? Curr. Biol. 2004;14:R879–R880. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yen MR, Saier MH., Jr Gap junctional proteins of animals: the innexin/pannexin superfamily. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2007;94:5–14. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2007.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wittlieb J, Khalturin K, Lohmann JU, Anton-Erxleben F, Bosch TCG. Transgenic Hydra allow in vivo tracking of individual stem cells during morphogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:6208–6211. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510163103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplemental information

ACTIONS

RESOURCES


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp