1. More precisely, we shall adopt the following general rule to define“simulated mental state” in terms of “mentalsimulation of”:
(RULE) A token stateM* is a simulated mental state if and onlyif there is another token stateM such that:M* is amental simulation of M.
For example, by applying RULE to RES-1, we obtain the followingdefinition of “simulated mental state”:
(SIM) Token stateM* is a simulated mental state if and onlyif:
2. By applying RULE (see footnote 1) to RES+REU, we also obtain thefollowing explicit definition of “simulated mentalstate”:
(SIM+) Token stateM* is a simulated mental state if and onlyif:
Please notice that the relations among RES+REU, PROC, and SIM+ aresuch that:
For this reason, we shall often swiftly move from one category to theother. When there is no need to draw any fine-grained distinctionamong these different notions, we shall use the expression“mental simulation” as a generic umbrella term. Insection 4, we shall also use the expression “mental simulationevents” to pick outsimulated mental states-or-simulationprocesses.
3. Moreover, bothM* andP* aremental simulationevents.
4. To be precise, it is instances of higher-level simulation processesthat have features (a) and (b). However, in order tosimplify the exposition, we shall put the token/type distinctionaside.
View this site from another server:
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy iscopyright © 2024 byThe Metaphysics Research Lab, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University
Library of Congress Catalog Data: ISSN 1095-5054