Results for 'Yutaro Sugimoto'
40 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Real Objects Can Impede Conditional Reasoning but Augmented Objects Do Not.Yuri Sato,YutaroSugimoto &Kazuhiro Ueda -2018 -Cognitive Science 42 (2):691-707.In this study, Knauff and Johnson-Laird's visual impedance hypothesis is applied to the domain of external representations and diagrammatic reasoning. We show that the use of real objects and augmented real objects can control human interpretation and reasoning about conditionals. As participants made inferences, they also moved objects corresponding to premises. Participants who moved real objects made more invalid inferences than those who moved AR objects and those who did not manipulate objects. Our results showed that real objects impeded conditional (...) reasoning, but AR objects did not. These findings are explained by the fact that real objects may over-specify a single state that exists, while AR objects suggest multiple possibilities. (shrink)No categories
- Remarks on logic for process descriptions in ontological reasoning: A Drug Interaction Ontology case study.Mitsuhiro Okada,Barry Smith &YutaroSugimoto -2008 - In Okada Mitsuhiro, Smith Barry & Sugimoto Yutaro, InterOntology. Proceedings of the First Interdisciplinary Ontology Meeting, Tokyo, Japan, 26-27 February 2008. Tokyo: Keio University Press. pp. 127-138.We present some ideas on logical process descriptions, using relations from the DIO (Drug Interaction Ontology) as examples and explaining how these relations can be naturally decomposed in terms of more basic structured logical process descriptions using terms from linear logic. In our view, the process descriptions are able to clarify the usual relational descriptions of DIO. In particular, we discuss the use of logical process descriptions in proving linear logical theorems. Among the types of reasoning supported by DIO one (...) can distinguish both (1) basic reasoning about general structures in reality and (2) the domain-specific reasoning of experts. We here propose a clarification of this important distinction between (realist) reasoning on the basis of an ontology and rule-based inferences on the basis of an expert’s view. (shrink)
- Making Sense of Nihonjinron.YoshioSugimoto -1999 -Thesis Eleven 57 (1):81-96.This article attempts to examine Nihonjinron, the popular essentialist genre in Japan, which purports to analyse Japan's quintessence and cultural core by using three concepts - nationality, ethnicity and culture - synonymously. The focus of the paper will be placed on: (1) the widespread political bases of Nihonjinron and its internal divisions; (2) its changing features in the face of globalization; (3) the possible productive uses of Nihonjinron at both conceptual and theoretical levels; and (4) the dilemma of inter-societal and (...) intra-societal cultural relativism, which the Nihonjinron debate has highlighted. The paper presents an outline of an inductive, pluralistic, multicultural model of analysis as a possible alternative. (shrink)
- Self-Initiated Actions Under Different Choice Architectures Affect Framing and Target Evaluation Even Without Verbal Manipulation.Yutaro Onuki,Hidehito Honda &Kazuhiro Ueda -2020 -Frontiers in Psychology 11.
- What Stimuli Are Necessary for Anchoring Effects to Occur?Yutaro Onuki,Hidehito Honda &Kazuhiro Ueda -2021 -Frontiers in Psychology 12.The anchoring effect is a form of cognitive bias in which exposure to some piece of information affects its subsequent numerical estimation. Previous studies have discussed which stimuli, such as numbers or semantic priming stimuli, are most likely to induce anchoring effects. However, it has not been determined whether anchoring effects will occur when a number is presented alone or when the semantic priming stimuli have an equivalent dimension between a target and the stimuli without a number. We conducted five (...) experimental studies using stimuli to induce anchoring effects. We found that anchoring effects did not occur when a number was presented alone or when phrases to induce semantic priming were used without presenting a number. These results indicate that both numerical and semantic priming stimuli must be presented for anchoring effects to occur. Our findings represent a substantial contribution to the literature on anchoring effects by offering insights into how these effects are generated. (shrink)
- Nishida tetsugaku to rekishiteki sekai: shūkyō no toi e.KōichiSugimoto -2013 - Kyōto-shi: Kyōto Daigaku Gakujutsu Shuppankai.昭和という動乱の時代に、その歴史の展開の中で、西田幾多郎は独自の思索を展開した。「歴史」という概念を軸に、「宗教」の問題に踏み込む西田哲学の全体像を描く。.
- Tanabe Hajime's Logic of Species and the Philosophy of Nishida Kitaro.KoichiSugimoto -2004 -Synthesis Philosophica 19 (1):35-48.Export citation
Bookmark - Yamaga Sokō Sensei no ningenzō: Yamaga Sokō Sensei sanbyakunensai kinen.KikukoSugimoto -1986 - Akō-shi: Akō Gishikai.Export citation Bookmark
- Bias in Peer Review.Carole J. Lee,Cassidy R.Sugimoto,Guo Zhang &Blaise Cronin -2013 -Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1):2-17.Research on bias in peer review examines scholarly communication and funding processes to assess the epistemic and social legitimacy of the mechanisms by which knowledge communities vet and self-regulate their work. Despite vocal concerns, a closer look at the empirical and methodological limitations of research on bias raises questions about the existence and extent of many hypothesized forms of bias. In addition, the notion of bias is predicated on an implicit ideal that, once articulated, raises questions about the normative implications (...) of research on bias in peer review. This review provides a brief description of the function, history, and scope of peer review; articulates and critiques the conception of bias unifying research on bias in peer review; characterizes and examines the empirical, methodological, and normative claims of bias in peer review research; and assesses possible alternatives to the status quo. We close by identifying ways to expand conceptions and studies of bias to countenance the complexity of social interactions among actors involved directly and indirectly in peer review. (shrink)
- Ankle-Worn Sensor Sleeve to increase walking motivation.MinatsuSugimoto,Hiroo Iwata &Hiroya Igarashi -2023 -AI and Society 38 (4):1793-1803.In this study, we propose the Ankle-Worn Sensor Sleeve to help people maintain their health. Furthermore, our approach uses this sensor sleeve to improve walking motivation by making the walking motion more sensible. In this research, we pursue the design of a wearable device that users can wear as a “shoe accessory,” with the aim of promoting people’s walking motivation. This device is ankle-worn and generates electricity using the physical flexion and extension of the ankle, detects and acquires the amount (...) of electricity generated, and uses the resulting power to produce sound and light feedback while walking. The Sleeve is designed to support health problems, such as locomotive syndrome and dementia, which are caused by physical inactivity. This article presents the results of a questionnaire survey conducted on 172 people who experienced or observed the device during exhibitions. The results reveal that this device increased people’s interest and motivation to walk, including those who did not like to walk. (shrink)
- Japanese Buddhists in the Monastery of Montserrat.GenkaiSugimoto -1990 -Buddhist-Christian Studies 10:200.
- (1 other version)Taigi.GorōSugimoto -1940Export citation Bookmark
- Ethics in Responsible Investment: How to Incorporate Ethics into Investment Analysis.ShunsukeSugimoto -2018 -Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 62 (1):15-22.This paper examines ethics in finance, specifically related to responsible investment. In recent years, socially responsible principles are becoming the de facto standard not only for socially responsible but also for profitable investing. For instance, the United Nations developed the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) in 2006, which require institutional investors to incorporate ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) issues into investment analysis and decision-making processes. This raises the following question: can responsible investments be justified from an ethical point of view? (...) In this paper I first explain responsible investments. Then, I turn to the ethical foundation of responsible investments. There are two arguments for responsible investments. I argue that both fail. Therefore, my conclusion is that the ethical foundation of responsible investments is not firm. (shrink)
- Mori Arimasa, sono keiken to shisō.HaruoSugimoto -1978Export citation Bookmark
- Philippa Foot's Theory of Practical Rationality without Natural Goodness.ShunsukeSugimoto -2017 -Journal of Philosophical Ideas (CCPEA2016 Special Issue):223- 244.In my paper, I partially defend Philippa Foot’s view in answering the question ‘why be moral?’ In her book, Natural Goodness(2001) and her final paper, “Rationality and Goodness” (2004), Foot proposes two ideas: Ethical Naturalism and, what I call, the ‘Anti-Humean Theory of Practical Rationality’. In answering the question ‘why be moral?’, I argue that we should abandon the former and adopt the latter. In Section I, I discuss Foot’s Anti-Humean Theory of Practical Rationality. In Section II, I examine Foot’s (...) Ethical Naturalism. I argue that it is no longer defensible. In Section III, I examine other possible ways to integrate the categories of practical rationality. One is to take a utilitarian approach and another is to take a Kantian approach. I argue that the latter approach is in harmony with Foot’s Anti-Humean Theory of Practical Rationality. (shrink)
- A Proposal For Revision Of The Organ Transplantation Law Based On A Child Donor’s Prior Declaration.Masahiro Morioka &TateoSugimoto -2001 -Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 11 (4):108-109.This is the translation of the so-called Morioka&Sugimoto proposal on brain death and transplantation. We proposed that the prior declaration of a brain dead child should be respected, and that when the child does not have a donor card the organ removal should be prohibited. A material for understanding an unprecedented bioethics debate now occurring in Japan.
- On Being Conscious as a Basic Liberty.Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu &ShunsukeSugimoto -2024 -American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (1):24-26.Crutchfield and Redinger (2024) maintain that “being conscious is a basic liberty,” and infer from this that without informed consent, deep sedation, by intruding upon one’s consciousness, is an in...
- Caretta: 個人空間と共有空間を統合した協調作業支援システム.Sugimoto Masanori Hosoi Kazuhiro -2004 -Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 19:136-144.In this paper, a system called Caretta that integrates personal and shared workspaces to support face-to-face collaboration is described. We use PDAs for individual users' personal workspaces that enable them to reflect on their own idea. A shared workspace has been implemented by using a multiple-input sensing board, which allows a group of users to simultaneously manipulate physical objects. In order to raise the level of awareness among users, we have used augmented reality technologies and created an immersive environment for (...) the users' shared workspace. Users of Caretta can discuss and negotiate with each other in the shared workspace, while they individually examine their ideas in their own personal workspaces. Therefore, Caretta allows users to participate in group activities interchangeably and seamlessly by using both these workspaces. Caretta can be used for several types of group activities. In this paper, it is used for supporting a group of users in urban planning tasks by allowing the users to actually construct a town on the shared space and evaluate the town through computer simulations. User studies to evaluate Caretta were conducted. Usage logs of Caretta, video analyses, and comments from users proved that each user could utilize personal and shared space interchangeably at their own pace and without being hindered by other users. (shrink)No categories
- Why Are There Failures of Systematicity? The Empirical Costs and Benefits of Inducing Universal Constructions.Steven Phillips,Yuji Takeda &FumieSugimoto -2016 -Frontiers in Psychology 7.
- The influences of working memory representations on long-range regression in text reading: an eye-tracking study.Teppei Tanaka,MasashiSugimoto,Yuki Tanida &Satoru Saito -2014 -Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
- Children attribute higher social status to people who have extraordinary capabilities.Xianwei Meng,Tatsunori Ishii,KairiSugimoto,Yo Nakawake,Yusuke Moriguchi,Yasuhiro Kanakogi &Katsumi Watanabe -2023 -Cognition 239 (C):105576.
- Dual-Routes and the Cost of Determining Least-Costs.Steven Phillips,Yuji Takeda &FumieSugimoto -2017 -Frontiers in Psychology 8.
- Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams.Elise Smith,Bryn Williams-Jones,Zubin Master,Vincent Larivière,Cassidy R.Sugimoto,Adèle Paul-Hus,Min Shi,Elena Diller,Katie Caudle &David B. Resnik -2020 -Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):1995-2022.Authorship is commonly used as the basis for the measurement of research productivity. It influences career progression and rewards, making it a valued commodity in a competitive scientific environment. To better understand authorship practices amongst collaborative teams, this study surveyed authors on collaborative journal articles published between 2011 and 2015. Of the 8364 respondents, 1408 responded to the final open-ended question, which solicited additional comments or remarks regarding the fair distribution of authorship in research teams. This paper presents the analysis (...) of these comments, categorized into four main themes: (1) disagreements, (2) questionable behavior, (3) external influences regarding authorship, and (4) values promoted by researchers. Results suggest that some respondents find ways to effectively manage disagreements in a collegial fashion. Conversely, others explain how distribution of authorship can become a “blood sport” or a “horror story” which can negatively affect researchers’ wellbeing, scientific productivity and integrity. Researchers fear authorship discussions and often try to avoid openly discussing the situation which can strain team interactions. Unethical conduct is more likely to result from deceit, favoritism, and questionable mentorship and may become more egregious when there is constant bullying and discrimination. Although values of collegiality, transparency and fairness were promoted by researchers, rank and need for success often overpowered ethical decision-making. This research provides new insight into contextual specificities related to fair authorship distribution that can be instrumental in developing applicable training tools to identify, prevent, and mitigate authorship disagreement. (shrink)
- Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science.Elise Smith,Bryn Williams-Jones,Zubin Master,Vincent Larivière,Cassidy R.Sugimoto,Adèle Paul-Hus,Min Shi &David B. Resnik -2020 -Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):1967-1993.Scientific authorship serves to identify and acknowledge individuals who “contribute significantly” to published research. However, specific authorship norms and practices often differ within and across disciplines, labs, and cultures. As a consequence, authorship disagreements are commonplace in team research. This study aims to better understand the prevalence of authorship disagreements, those factors that may lead to disagreements, as well as the extent and nature of resulting misbehavior. Methods include an international online survey of researchers who had published from 2011 to (...) 2015. Of the 6673 who completed the main questions pertaining to authorship disagreement and misbehavior, nearly half reported disagreements regarding authorship naming; and discipline, rank, and gender had significant effects on disagreement rates. Paradoxically, researchers in multidisciplinary teams that typically reflect a range of norms and values, were less likely to have faced disagreements regarding authorship. Respondents reported having witnessed a wide range of misbehavior including: instances of hostility, undermining of a colleague’s work during meetings/talks, cutting corners on research, sabotaging a colleague’s research, or producing fraudulent work to be more competitive. These findings suggest that authorship disputes may contribute to an unhealthy competitive dynamic that can undermine researchers’ wellbeing, team cohesion, and scientific integrity. (shrink)
- At the crossroads of logic, psychology, and behavioral genetics.J. Ando,C. Shikishima,K. Hiraishi,Y.Sugimoto,R. Takemura &M. Okada -2006 - In D. Andler, M. Okada & I. Watanabe,Reasoning and Cognition. pp. 9-36.Export citation Bookmark
- Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Particle Physics : Invited Lecture Given atSugimoto Campus, Osaka City University on June 14, 2009.Hiroshi Itoyama -2010 -Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 37 (2):87-94.No categories
- On Slowness: Toward an Aesthetic of the Contemporary.Lutz Koepnick -2014 - New York: Cambridge University Press.Speed is an obvious facet of contemporary society, whereas slowness has often been dismissed as conservative and antimodern. Challenging a long tradition of thought, Lutz Koepnick instead proposes we understand slowness as a strategy of the contemporary--a decidedly modern practice that gazes firmly at and into the present's velocity. As he engages with late twentieth- and early twenty-first-century art, photography, video, film, and literature, Koepnick explores slowness as a critical medium to intensify our temporal and spatial experiences. Slowness helps us (...) register the multiple layers of time, history, and motion that constitute our present. It offers a timely mode of aesthetic perception and representation that emphasizes the openness of the future and undermines any conception of the present as a mere replay of the past. Discussing the photography and art of Janet Cardiff, Olafur Eliasson, HiroshiSugimoto, and Michael Wesely; the films of Peter Weir and Tom Tykwer; the video installations of Douglas Gordon, Willie Doherty, and Bill Viola; and the fiction of Don DeLillo, Koepnick shows how slowness can carve out spaces within processes of acceleration that allow us to reflect on alternate temporalities and durations. (shrink)
- ‘Not lost in loss itself’: On the consolations of morality (Proceedings of the CAPE International Workshops, 2013. Part I: The CAPE International Conference “Ethics and Well-being”).Michael Campbell -2014 -CAPE Studies in Applied Philosophy and Ethics Series 2:55-63.9th and 10th Nov. 2013 at Kyoto University. Organizers: Takeshi Sato and ShunsukeSugimoto.No categories
- Well-being as flourishing in the capabilities approach (Proceedings of the CAPE International Workshops, 2013. Part I: The CAPE International Conference “Ethics and Well-being”).Lidia de Tienda Palop -2014 -CAPE Studies in Applied Philosophy and Ethics Series 2:37-44.9th and 10th Nov. 2013 at Kyoto University. Organizers: Takeshi Sato and ShunsukeSugimoto.No categories
- Reasons and the form of practical identity (Proceedings of the CAPE International Workshops, 2013. Part I: The CAPE International Conference “Ethics and Well-being”).Yuuki Ohta -2014 -CAPE Studies in Applied Philosophy and Ethics Series 2:65-84.9th and 10th Nov. 2013 at Kyoto University. Organizers: Takeshi Sato and ShunsukeSugimoto.No categories
- Is the wellbeing of individuals only what matters? (Proceedings of the CAPE International Workshops, 2013. Part I: The CAPE International Conference “Ethics and Well-being”).Ryo Chonabayashi -2014 -CAPE Studies in Applied Philosophy and Ethics Series 2:27-35.9th and 10th Nov. 2013 at Kyoto University. Organizers: Takeshi Sato and ShunsukeSugimoto.No categories
- Well-being and political obligation (Proceedings of the CAPE International Workshops, 2013. Part I: The CAPE International Conference “Ethics and Well-being”).Takumichi Kojo -2014 -CAPE Studies in Applied Philosophy and Ethics Series 2:131-139.9th and 10th Nov. 2013 at Kyoto University. Organizers: Takeshi Sato and ShunsukeSugimoto.No categories
- Psychological perfectionism and the paradox of obligation (Proceedings of the CAPE International Workshops, 2013. Part I: The CAPE International Conference “Ethics and Well-being”).Claire Benn -2014 -CAPE Studies in Applied Philosophy and Ethics Series 2:101-117.9th and 10th Nov. 2013 at Kyoto University. Organizers: Takeshi Sato and ShunsukeSugimoto.No categories
- On happiness in Locke’s decision-making theory (Proceedings of the CAPE International Workshops, 2013. Part I: The CAPE International Conference “Ethics and Well-being”).Taku Sasaki -2014 -CAPE Studies in Applied Philosophy and Ethics Series 2:141-151.9th and 10th Nov. 2013 at Kyoto University. Organizers: Takeshi Sato and ShunsukeSugimoto.No categories
- CLIPing Staufen to secondary RNA structures: Size and location matter!Sandra M. Fernández Moya &Michael A. Kiebler -2015 -Bioessays 37 (10):1062-1066.hiCLIP (RNA hybrid and individual‐nucleotide resolution ultraviolet cross‐linking and immunoprecipitation), is a novel technique developed bySugimoto et al. (2015). Here, the use of different adaptors permits a controlled ligation of the two strands of a RNA duplex allowing the identification of each arm in the duplex upon sequencing. The authors chose a notoriously difficult to study double‐stranded RNA‐binding protein (dsRBP) termed Staufen1, a mammalian homolog of Drosophila Staufen involved in mRNA localization and translational control. Using hiCLIP, they discovered (...) a dominance of intramolecular RNA duplexes compared to the total RNA duplexes identified. Importantly, the authors discovered two different types of intramolecular duplexes in the cell: highly translated mRNAs with long‐range duplexes in their 3′‐UTRs and poorly translated mRNAs with duplexes in their coding region. In conclusion, the authors establish hiCLIP as an important novel technique for the identification of RNA secondary structures that serve as in vivo binding sites for dsRBPs. (shrink)
- Well-being and using persons (Proceedings of the CAPE International Workshops, 2013. Part I: The CAPE International Conference “Ethics and Well-being”).Paulus Kaufmann -2014 -CAPE Studies in Applied Philosophy and Ethics Series 2:3-15.9th and 10th Nov. 2013 at Kyoto University. Organizers: Takeshi Sato and ShunsukeSugimoto.No categories
- Well-being and absolute value: Holland and the mystery of goodness (Proceedings of the CAPE International Workshops, 2013. Part I: The CAPE International Conference “Ethics and Well-being”).Miriam Pryke -2014 -CAPE Studies in Applied Philosophy and Ethics Series 2:119-129.9th and 10th Nov. 2013 at Kyoto University. Organizers: Takeshi Sato and ShunsukeSugimoto.No categories
- Hume on well-being (Proceedings of the CAPE International Workshops, 2013. Part I: The CAPE International Conference “Ethics and Well-being”).Seiyu Hayashi -2014 -CAPE Studies in Applied Philosophy and Ethics Series 2:45-53.9th and 10th Nov. 2013 at Kyoto University. Organizers: Takeshi Sato and ShunsukeSugimoto.
- The Uncanny: An Introduction.Nicholas Royle -2002 - New York: Manchester University Press.The popular image of Japanese society is a steroetypical one - that of a people characterised by a coherent set of thought and behaviour patterns, applying to all Japanese and transcending time. Ross Mouer and YoshioSugimoto found this image quite incongruous during their research for this book in Japan. They ask whether this steroetype of the Japanese is not only generated by foreigners but by the Japanese themselves. This is likely to be a controversial book as it does (...) not contribute to the continuing mythologising of Japan and the Japanese. The book examines contemporary images of Japanese society by surveying an extensive sample of popular and academic literature on Japan. After tracing the development of "holistic" theories about the Japanese, commonly referred to as the "group model", attention is focused on the evaluation of that image. Empirical evidence contrary to this model is discussed and methodological lacunae are cited. A "sociology of Japanology" is also presented. In pursuit of other visions of Japanese society, the authors argue that certain aspects of Japanese behaviour can be explained by considering Japanese society as the exact inverse of the portayal provided by the group model. The authors also present a multi-dimensional model of social stratification, arguing that much of the variation in Japanese behaviour can be understood within the framework as having universal equivalence. (shrink)
- Équipement technique ou objets d’art? Du geste outillé dans la cérémonie du thé japonaise.Iulia Toader -2020 -Nouvelle Revue d'Esthétique 24 (2):99-108.Dans les années 1900, la cérémonie du thé fut érigée en art total, comme la quintessence même de l’esprit japonais. Par-delà le biais des enjeux politiques de cette artification, le discours académique portant sur la cérémonie du thé a également été perméable à l’esprit contradictoire inhérent à cette pratique. Nous tentons de dépasser ces difficultés par une vision réticulaire de l’art telle que la défend Simondon dans sa techno-esthétique, tandis que la Glass Tea House Mondrian deSugimoto Hiroshi offre (...) une métaphore permettant d’approfondir la place de l’abstraction dans la voie du thé. Dans cette réflexion, au détriment de l’objet réel conçu comme une entité isolée, le geste technique, outillé, s’avère jouer un rôle plus déterminant que ne lui accorde la tradition. (shrink)No categories
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-sq5lk uwo