Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Works by William G. Bartholome

(view other items matching `William G. Bartholome`,view all matches )
9 found
Order:

1 filter applied
  1.  135
    Review of Ruth R. Faden and Tom L. Beauchamp:A History and Theory of Informed Consent. [REVIEW]William G. Bartholome -1988 -Ethics 98 (3):605-606.
  2.  31
    Parents, Children, and the Moral Benefits of Research.William G. Bartholome -1976 -Hastings Center Report 6 (6):44-45.
  3.  23
    Contested Terrain: In the Best Interests of..Howard Brody &William G. Bartholome -1988 -Hastings Center Report 18 (6):37.
  4. Hearing children's voices.William G. Bartholome -1995 -Bioethics Forum 11 (4):3-6.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5. Clinical ethics and ethics committees.William G. Bartholome -1994 -Bioethics Forum 10 (4):5-10.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  26
    Informed Consent in Medical Therapy and Research.William G. Bartholome &Bernard Barber -1980 -Hastings Center Report 10 (4):21.
    Book reviewed in this article: Informed Consent in Medical Therapy and Research. By Bernard Barber.
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  29
    In Defense of a Child's Right to Assent.William G. Bartholome -1982 -Hastings Center Report 12 (5):44-45.
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  32
    Imperiled Newborns Raise Moral Doubts.William G. Bartholome -1985 -Hastings Center Report 15 (1):46-47.
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  76
    Physician-Assisted Suicide, Hospice, and Rituals of Withdrawal.William G. Bartholome -1996 -Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (3):233-236.
    As I write, I hear that Dr. Jack Kevorluan has delivered another victim to the emergency room of his local Michigan hospital. Why do physicians and terminally ill patients feel we need to change the law with respect to assisted suicide when a rogue pathologist, who has been stripped of his medical license, is allowed to pursue his appetite for providing his clients with inhalation treatments of carbon monoxide gas? If no court will convict this outlaw, what makes the physicians (...) and patients who brought Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington and Quill v. Vacco fear that any court would ever convict a licensed physician of assisting in a suicide when he/she writes one of her established patients a prescription for a short-acting barbiturate? Moreover, it is not even clear that laws against assisted suicide in most jurisdictions were ever intended to apply to the actions of licensed physicians. Nonetheless, the plaintiffs in the Second and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals were clearly seeking some kind of redress, some kind of protection from potential legal claims they feared might be made against them. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.

Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:

Email RSS feed
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct

CDPPhiosophy Documentation Center
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation

Server: philpapers-web-6dc498764b-td4v8 uwo
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp