Results for 'Wesley N. Sivak'
956 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Ethical Considerations of Whole-Eye Transplantation.Kia M. Washington,Gerard Magill,Mario G. Solari,Joel S. Schuman,Maxine R. Miller,Yang Li,Chiaki Komatsu,Edward H. Davidson &Wesley N.Sivak -2016 -Journal of Clinical Ethics 27 (1):64-67.Whole eye transplantation (WET) remains experimental. Long presumed impossible, recent scientific advances regarding WET suggest that it may become a clinical reality. However, the ethical implications of WET as an experimental therapeutic strategy remain largely unexplored. This article evaluates the ethical considerations surrounding WET as an emerging experimental treatment for vision loss. A thorough review of published literature pertaining to WET was performed; ethical issues were identified during review of the articles.No categories
- Desire beyond identity: Irigaray and the ethics of embodiment.Wesley N. Barker -2025 - Albany: State University of New York Press.Critically adapts the notion of desire in Luce Irigaray's philosophy to rethink the role of embodiment in sociopolitical and philosophical discourses today"-- Provided by publisher.No categoriesExport citation
Bookmark - Structural Highness Notions.Wesley Calvert,Johanna N. Y. Franklin &Dan Turetsky -2023 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 88 (4):1692-1724.We introduce several highness notions on degrees related to the problem of computing isomorphisms between structures, provided that isomorphisms exist. We consider variants along axes of uniformity, inclusion of negative information, and several other problems related to computing isomorphisms. These other problems include Scott analysis (in the form of back-and-forth relations), jump hierarchies, and computing descending sequences in linear orders.
- The Dubious Practice of Sensationalizing Anatomical Dissection (and Death) in the Humanities Literature.Carl N. Stephan &Wesley Fisk -2021 -Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 18 (2):221-228.Past anatomical dissection practice has received recent attention in the humanities and social science literature, especially in a number of popular format books. In these works, past ethically dubious dissection practices are again revisited, including stealing the dead for dissection. There are extremely simple, yet very important, lessons to be had in these analyses, including: do not exploit the dead and treat the dead with dignity, respect, and reverence. In this paper, we highlight that these principles apply not just to (...) anatomists but to all parties concerned with bodies for dissection, including journalists and authors from the humanities writing on anatomical dissection whether in the historical or modern-day context. Not too infrequently these same authors/publishers resort to sensationalist language in titles, text, and/or promotion blurbs in a bid to grab attention and sell books. These actions, yet again, exploit dissection subjects for commercial purposes. The use of insensitive and sensationalist language that is designed to shock, fails to set good precedent for young impressionable students and paints an entirely backward picture of modern-day anatomy for intending or existing donors and their families. We suggest that all who participate in anatomical endeavours should strive to do so with reverence toward the dead, including armchair journalists and humanities authors who, just like their hands-on anatomical colleagues, should employ dignified, sensitive, and respectful language that is not sensationalist. (shrink)
- Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Neurophysiology, Adaptive DBS, Virtual Reality, Neuroethics and Technology.Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora,James Giordano,Aysegul Gunduz,Jose Alcantara,Jackson N. Cagle,Stephanie Cernera,Parker Difuntorum,Robert S. Eisinger,Julieth Gomez,Sarah Long,Brandon Parks,Joshua K. Wong,Shannon Chiu,Bhavana Patel,Warren M. Grill,Harrison C. Walker,Simon J. Little,Ro’ee Gilron,Gerd Tinkhauser,Wesley Thevathasan,Nicholas C. Sinclair,Andres M. Lozano,Thomas Foltynie,Alfonso Fasano,Sameer A. Sheth,Katherine Scangos,Terence D. Sanger,Jonathan Miller,Audrey C. Brumback,Priya Rajasethupathy,Cameron McIntyre,Leslie Schlachter,Nanthia Suthana,Cynthia Kubu,Lauren R. Sankary,Karen Herrera-Ferrá,Steven Goetz,Binith Cheeran,G. Karl Steinke,Christopher Hess,Leonardo Almeida,Wissam Deeb,Kelly D. Foote &Okun Michael S. -2020 -Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14.
- 4-H community pride program.Lynne P. Kaplan,James Grieshop,Paul DeBach,Ronald D. Oetting,Frank S. Morishita,Roland N. Jefferson,Wesley A. Humphrey,Seward T. Besemer,Albert O. Paulus &Jerry Nelson -1977 - In Vincent Stuart,Order. [New York]: Random House.
- Le Philosophe dans la cité.Jozef Sivák -2006 -The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:9-15.Quelle est la place du philosophe dans son environnemen social (societe civile) en general et aux moments des grands bouleversements sociopolitiques en particulier? S'il doit en parier, doit-il agir en acteur aussi? Ne risque-t-il pas de perdre son identite professionnelle? 1 Ä son habitus intellectuel et scientifique s'ajoute ainsi une dimension ethique allant d'une attitude de sagesse et de distance ä une interpretation axiologique et essentialiste des phenomenes politiques. Toutefois, le philosophe n'est pas politicien et s'il lui arrive ä s'engager (...) sur le plan politique, il risque de perdre son identite professionnelle, son autorite morale, et sa liberte. (shrink)No categories
- The Mystery of Stakes and Error in Ascriber Intuitions.Wesley Buckwalter -2014 - In James R. Beebe,Advances in Experimental Epistemology. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Research in experimental epistemology has revealed a great, yet unsolved mystery: why do ordinary evaluations of knowledge ascribing sentences involving stakes and error appear to diverge so systematically from the predictions professional epistemologists make about them? Two recent solutions to this mystery by Keith DeRose (2011) and N. Ángel Pinillos (2012) argue that these differences arise due to specific problems with the designs of past experimental studies. This paper presents two new experiments to directly test these responses. Results vindicate previous (...) findings by suggesting that (i) the solution to the mystery is not likely to be based on the empirical features these theorists identify, and (ii) that the salience of ascriber error continues to make the difference in folk ratings of third-person knowledge ascribing sentences. (shrink)
- Human rights and business ethics: Fashioning a new social contract. [REVIEW]Wesley Cragg -2000 -Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):205 - 214.This paper argues that widely accepted understanding of the respective responsibilities of business and government in the post war industrialized world can be traced back to a tacit social contract that emerged following the second world war. The effect of this contract was to assign responsibility for generating wealth to business and responsibility for ensuring the equitable sharing of wealth to governments. Without question, this arrangement has resulted in substantial improvements in the quality of life in the industrialized world in (...) the intervening period. I argue that with advance of economic globalization and the growing power and influence of multi national corporations, this division of responsibilities is not longer viable or defensible. What is needed, fifty years after the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, is a new social contract that shares responsibilities for human rights and related ethical responsibilities in a manner more in keeping with the vision captured by the post war Declaration. I conclude by suggesting some reasons for thinking that a new social contract may be emerging. (shrink)
- The Dimensions of Spirituality Inventory.Wesley J. Wildman,David Rohr,Steven J. Sandage &Nicholas C. Donato -2024 -Archive for the Psychology of Religion 46 (1):35-70.The Dimensions of Spirituality Inventory (DSI) is a 50-item quantitative assessment of spirituality. Whereas “spirituality” has seemed to some to be too vague for research purposes, the DSI follows earlier qualitative research in showing that usage of the word points to an intelligible conceptual structure. Instead of defining spirituality and then operationalizing it, as most extant instruments do, the DSI defines and operationalizes 21 relatively uncontroversial elemental components of spirituality, so the overall interpretation of spirituality can only emerge after factor (...) analysis. Just as an alphabet flexibly expresses words and sentences, so the 21 DSI dimensions permit the discovery of latent constructs corresponding to cultural packages of spirituality at the present time. The DSI avoids culturally parochial formulations of items, thanks to intense multidisciplinary engagement among social scientists, scholars of religion, and psychologists of religion, and thus is suitable for cross-cultural application. This paper reports on a study based on a participant pool recruited for ExploringMyReligion.org, in part from Prolific (N = 820, after culling unreliable responses). The DSI is interpreted and validated in relation to several other relevant measures, and the factor analysis is strongly resonant with prior qualitative studies. The psychometric properties of the DSI make it usable as an overall spirituality scale as well as a sensitive inventory of types and configurations of spirituality. (shrink)No categories
- The predictive inference.Wesley C. Salmon -1957 -Philosophy of Science 24 (2):180-190.A common type of inductive problem is to predict the nature of an unobserved finite sample of a given population on the basis of an observed finite sample of the same population. More precisely, given a class of events A, we examine a sample Sn having n members, of which mi belong to the class Bi. On the basis of our knowledge that mi/n of Sn have been Bi, we attempt to predict the ratio of members of Bi to members (...) of A in a sample Sr containing r unobserved members of A. This type of inference has been called “predictive inference” by Carnap. It is not necessary to argue that all inductive problems reduce to this form; we merely observe that such problems frequently arise, and that they have practical and theoretical importance. In The Short Run I suggested that this kind of problem could be handled by first determining the long run probability P of Bi, relative to A of Bi, to A in the observed sample Sn) and then predicting that the relative frequency of Bi within the unobserved sample Sr will approximate P sufficiently for practical purposes. The foregoing procedure requires a rule of each of two types: a rule for the ascertainment of the values of long run probabilities, and a rule for the application of knowledge of long run probabilities to predictions in the short run. The Short Run was not concerned with the nature and justification of rules of the first type, but rather sought to justify a rule of the second type on the assumption that we already possess knowledge of long run probabilities. (shrink)
- Alternative Models of Scientific Explanation.Wesley C. Salmon &Merrilee H. Salmon -1997 - In Wesley C. Salmon,Causality and Explanation. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.Coauthored with Merrilee Salmon, addresses archaeologists and other anthropologists interested in the nature of scientific explanation. A group called the new archaeologists, concerned to assure the scientific status of archaeology, had become convinced that a sine qua non of science is the construction of explanations conforming to Hempel's D‐N model. The authors aim was to show that a much wider class of covering law models of explanation is available, and that others in this set are more suitable than the D‐N (...) model for archaeology and anthropology. At the same time, they show that the so‐called systems approach, advocated by other archaeologists, has all of the shortcomings of the D‐N model without offering improvements in exchange. (shrink)No categories
- Causality in Archaeological Explanation.Wesley C. Salmon -1997 - In Wesley C. Salmon,Causality and Explanation. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.This chapter extends the discussion of the preceding chapter, and emphasizes the causal dimensions of explanation in archaeology. The author considers the sorts of situations that archaeologists want to explain, and notes that many of these are events that result from a complex set of factors, some of which are positively relevant to the occurrence of the event and others that are negatively relevant. In addition, many events that archaeologists want to explain are events that had a very low probability (...) of occurrence. The author argues that formal philosophical models of explanation, such as the D‐N and the I‐S models, are ill suited to the task of archaeological explanation. What is needed, he says, is the development of a probabilistic account of causality that can supplement notions of statistical relevance in explanations of archaeological phenomena. (shrink)No categories
- Actualidad académica de la bioética personalista. Análisis cuantitativo y comparación con la propuesta original de Elio Sgreccia.MaironWesley Galvik Mendes -2025 -Medicina y Ética 36 (2):542-583.El personalismo ontológico y la bioética personalista colocan a la persona humana en el centro de las consideraciones éticas, abogando por un respeto que refleje la dignidad y el valor intrínsecos de la persona. Este trabajo busca evidenciar cuantitativamente cuál es la influencia académica de la BPOF en el mundo actual y cuál es la visión que los actuales expertos en bioética, considerados personalistas, tienende la misma BPOF, para así establecer una comparación con la propuesta original. Esto nos ayuda a (...) entender mejor sus críticas y actualizaciones para favorecer una mejor comprensión de la propuesta de la BPOF y su diálogo con el mundo actual. El número de publicaciones muestra el influjo de la BPOF en el mundo académico. El análisis de estas revela que muchas de las publicaciones bioéticas catalogadas como personalistas no son específicas de la BPOF, pues carecen del fundamento, metodología o argumentación propiamente de la misma. Tal carencia puede llevar a que estas propuestas singulares no sean realmente efectivas en la defensa y promoción de la dignidad de todo ser humano, además de generar confusión en la comprensión de la BPOF por su falta de unidad. (shrink)No categories
- Hume's skepticism about inductive inference.N. Scott Arnold -1983 -Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (1):31-56.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: Hume's Skepticism about Inductive Inference N. SCOTT ARNOLD IT HAS BEEN A COMMONPLACE among commentators on Hume's philosophy that he was a radical skeptic about inductive inference. In addition, he is alleged to have been the first philosopher to pose the so-called problem of induction. Until recently, however, Hume's argument in this connection has not been subject to very close scrutiny. As attention has become focused on this (...) argument, a debate has been shaping up concerning just what Hume intended to establish here. The principal purpose of this article is to settle this interpretive issue as decisively as the texts permit. I should also like to locate Hume's main argument about induction in the larger context of his discussion of skepti- cism in book 1 of the Treatise. I shall suggest that arguments for the radical skepticism commonly attributed to Hume can be found only very late in book 1 of the Treatise and that the most famous argument about inductive inference establishes and is intended to establish only a relatively modest form of skepticism. The argument under consideration can found in book l, part 3, section 6 of the Treatise. It can also be found in essays 4 and 5 of the Enquiries and in the abstract of the Treatise published anonymously by Hume. I shall concen- trate on the Treatise version since it is the first and perhaps most explicit formulation of the argument and because part of my purpose is to place this argument in the larger context of book 1 of the Treatise. The received opinion concerning Hume's argument has it that Hume was highly skeptical about the mind's claims to knowledge about the future (or, more generally, about the unobserved). All beliefs arrived at via inductive I should like to thank M. G. Anderson, John Bahde, Jon Nordy, and Robert Paul Wolff, as well as David Fate Norton and a referee for the Journal of the History of Philosophy, for helpful comments on earlier drafts on this article. 32 HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY inferences are unreasonable or unjustified. The alternative interpretation, to be defended below, is that Hume held that no such belief is or can be rendered certain relative to past experience and that such beliefs are not, upon that account, unreasonable or unjustified. Something like this inter- pretation has been defended by Tom L. Beauchamp, Thomas Mappes, and Alexander Rosenberg. ~ My view differs from theirs in that I shall argue that Hume did offer arguments for the more radical skepticism commonly attri- buted to him (though it is unclear whether he regarded them as decisive). These arguments, however, come at the end of book ~ of the Treatise and are independent of the more famous argument to be discussed below. Defenders of the received view are both numerous and distinguished. Versions of this interpretation of the main argument can be found in the writings of Karl Popper,Wesley Salmon, F. L. Will, and Norman Kemp Smith; most recently a variation on the standard interpretation has been defended by Barry Stroud. The fullest and most elaborate defense of the standard interpretation can be found in a monograph by D. C. Stove. '~ Stove's discussion is perhaps the most impressive because of his painstaking efforts to lay bare the structure of Hume's reasoning and to give a line-by- line analysis of the argument. This has the effect of bringing more clearly into focus the main grounds for the standard view. If this standard interpre- tation is correct, then Hume's position is that scientific method is epistemically no better than "superstition" and "enthusiasm." And, Hume would be among those for whom this claim, if true, would be very bad news, because one of his primary purposes in the Treatise is to construct a science of man. Thus, this argument is of considerable internal significance because, if my opponents are correct, Hume appears to have cut the ground out from under what he took to be one of his most important projects -- the construc- tion of a science of man. The other feature of this argument that makes it worthy of serious con- sideration is that it is philosophically... (shrink)
- JohnWesley se Aldersgate-ervaring: ’n Herwaardering.M. C. Kitshoff -1989 -HTS Theological Studies 45 (4).No categories
- Wesley C. Salmon. Logic. Foundations of philosophy series. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1963, xiv + 114 pp. [REVIEW]Harry Stopes-Roe -1964 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (2):89-90.
- (1 other version)Logic.Wesley C. Salmon. Logic. Second, enlarged and revised, edition of XXIX 89. Foundations of philosophy series. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1973, x + 150 pp. [REVIEW]Ian Carlstrom -1977 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (1):107-108.
- The concept of evidence.Peter Achinstein (ed.) -1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.This anthology presents work on major topics surrounding the concept of evidence as employed in the empirical sciences. Focusing on the "classificatory" concept of evidence rather than the quantitative "degree of confirmation," the selections include Carl G. Hempel's satisfaction definition, R.B. Braithwaite's hypothetic-deductive view, N.R. Hanson's account of retroduction, Nelson Goodman's entrenchment theory, probability definitions discussed by Rudolf Carnap andWesley Salmon, Clark Glymour's bootstrap theory, and a view of Achinstein's that combines probability and explanation.
- Palchŏn Han'guk ŭi kyoyuk inyŏm t'amgu.Ch'ŏn-sŏk O. -1975 - Sŏul: Kwangmyŏng Ch'ulp'ansa.Export citation Bookmark
- (1 other version)Chosŏn Yugyo yŏnwŏn oe.Chi-yŏn Chang -1922 - Sŏul T'ŭkpyŏlsi: Myŏngmundang.Export citation Bookmark
- Educación y filosofía.Ramón Espinosa Contreras -2012 - In Julián Pérez, María Antonieta, Humberto Maldonado Gómez, Candelario Degante Castañeda & Ramón Espinosa Contreras,Educación y filosofía. México, D.F.: Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero.Export citation Bookmark
- Tamhŏn ŭi ŭmak kwa sot'ong.Song Chi-wŏn -2012 - In Sŏg-yun Mun,Tamhŏn Hong Tae-yong yŏn'gu. Sŏul T'ŭkpyŏlsi: Saram ŭi Munŭi.Export citation Bookmark
- Chosŏn sirhak ŭi kaechʻŏkcha sibin.Kwan-U. Chʻŏn (ed.) -1974Export citation Bookmark
- La rebelión de las masas como sociología.Antón Donoso -1992 - In Ciriaco Morón Arroyo,Ortega y Gasset: un humanista para nuestro tiempo. Erie, Pa.: ALDEEU.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- 17-segi Chosŏn, maŭm ŭi ch'ŏrhak: Song Si-yŏl haktan ŭi maŭm e kwanhan t'amgu.Sŏn-yŏl Yi -2015 - Kyŏnggi-do P'aju-si: Kŭl Hangari.1. Hŏryŏng, t'ŏng piŏ yŏnghwarhan maŭm -- 2. Ajik tŭrŏnaji anŭn maŭm esŏ chigak i kanŭng han'ga -- 3. Mibal kwa kijil ŭn ŏttŏn kwan'gye in'ga -- 4. Umjiginŭn maŭm kwa koyohan maŭm -- 5. Chigak ŭi sŏnggyŏk kwa kŭ yŏnwŏn e kwanhan munje.No categories
- Comunicación, participación y lenguaje.Fermín Fèvre -1968 - [Buenos Aires]: Museo de Arte Moderno. Edited by Marcelo Montserrat.
- Maŭm kongbu rŭl tullŏssan Chosŏn yuhakchadŭl ŭi ttŭgŏun nonjaengsŏ : Simgyŏng puju.Hong Wŏn-sik -2017 - In Sŏk-ki Chʻoe,Chujahak ŭi kojŏn, kŭ Chosŏnjŏk haesŏk kwa silch'ŏn. Kyŏnggi-do P'aju-si: Chŏmp'ilchae.Export citation Bookmark
- Francisco de Vitoria y su Releción sobre los indios: los derechos de los hombres y de los pueblos.Ramón Hernández Martín -1998 - Madrid: Edibesa.Homenaje al Fundador del Derecho Internacional de Gentes, en el 50 Aniversario de la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos, 1948 1998.Export citation Bookmark
- Pak Hŏn-yŏng: Chosŏn Kongsandang kwa kŭpchin inyŏm ŭi yŏksajŏk hŭrŭm.Chŏng Sŭng-hyŏn -2019 - In Chŏng-in Kang,Inmul ro ingnŭn hyŏndae Han'guk chŏngch'i sasang ŭi hŭrŭm: haebang ihu put'ŏ 1980-yŏndae kkaji. Kyŏnggi-do P'aju-si: Ak'anet.Export citation Bookmark
- Iṣlāḥullisān.Sult̤ān Nigāh -2012 - Citrāl: Iḥsān Kitāb Maḥal.On the importance of good deeds in Islam.Export citation Bookmark
- Notas de introducción al derecho.Manuel Simón Egaña -1963 - Caracas,: Editorial Criterio.
- Chân-thiện-mỹ, sự thống nhất và đa dạng trong văn hóa nghệ thuật.Huy Đỗ,Văn Phúc Nguyễn &Quang Lê (eds.) -1993 - Hà Nội: Khoa học xã hội.Export citation Bookmark
- Faylasūfān rāʼidān, al-Kindī wa-al-Fārābī.Jaʻfar Āl Yāsīn -1980 - Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Andalus lil-Ṭibāʻah wa-al-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʻ.Export citation Bookmark
- La función del derecho en la crisis.José Cabrera Bazán -1983 - Cádiz: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz.
- Construcción del objeto teórico de estudio: otra forma de decirlo.Chavarría Carranza &Carlos Yurán -2020 - Barrio La Soledad del Concejo Municipal de San José [Costa Rica]: Editorial Librería Alma Mater.No categories
- Ch'ŏn Kyu-sŏk ŭi yullijŏk sobi.Kyu-sŏk Ch'ŏn -2010 - Sŏul-si: Silch'ŏn Munhak.
- Yuhak kwaŭi tchalbŭn mannam.To-wŏn Chŏng -2009 - Sŏul T'ŭkpyŏlsi: Munsach'ŏl.No categories
- Cho Yong-hŏn ŭi Tongyanghak kangŭi.Yong-hŏn Cho -2010 - Sŏul-si: Raendŏm Hausŭ.v. 1. Insa p'yŏn -- v. 2. Ch'ŏnmun p'yŏn.
- Optimality in Biological and Artificial Networks?Daniel S. Levine &Wesley R. Elsberry (eds.) -1997 - Lawrence Erlbaum.This book is the third in a series based on conferences sponsored by the Metroplex Institute for Neural Dynamics, an interdisciplinary organization of neural ...
- Limitstions of Deductivism.Adolf Grünbaum &Wesley C. Salmon (eds.) -1988 - University of California Press, Berkeley, Ca.
- Las evidencias del yo puro : una interpretación desde Ideas I.Hernán Alonso Jaramillo Fernández -2013 - In Germán Vargas Guillén,La región de lo espiritual en el centenario de la publicación de Ideas I de E. Husserl. Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.Export citation Bookmark
- Pensando la religión: homenaje a Manuel Fraijó.Manuel Fraijó,Javier San Martín &Juan José Sánchez (eds.) -2013 - Madrid: Editorial Trotta.No categories
- (1 other version)Manual de introducción a las ciencias jurídicas y sociales.Hübner Gallo &Jorge Iván -1952 - Santiago,: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.Export citation Bookmark
- Ham Sŏk-hŏn chajŏnjŏk insaengnon.Sŏk-hŏn Ham -2003 - Sŏul-si: Chŏngusa. Edited by Sŏk-hŏn Ham.
- Juan Caramuel: su aportación al cálculo de probabilidades: un tributo en su IV Centenario.Camúñez Ruiz &José Antonio -2007 - Huelva: Universidad de Huelva. Edited by Jesús Basulto Santos, García del Hoyo & Juan José.En 1670, el autor español Juan Caramuel publicó en Italia el segundo tomo de una magna obra, Mathesis biceps (publicada en latín), sobre el saber matemático de su época. En el mismo se incluía un capítulo (un "sintagma" según el propio Caramuel), titulado Kybeia ("juegos de dados" en griego), donde el autor introduce su idea del origen del juego y resuelve algunos problemas relacionados con los mismos, convirtiéndose en una de las obras tempranas sobre cálculo de probablidades. En este texto (...) se da un repaso a los antecedentes al trabajo de Caramuel relacionados con el cálculo de probabilidades, se analiza punto por punto la aportación de este autor al nuevo cálculo en su Kybeia, y se añade la traducción al castellano del mismo. (shrink)
- La razón y la vida: escritos en homenaje a Javier San Martín.Javier San Martín,Díaz Álvarez,M. Jesús &José Lasaga Medina (eds.) -2018 - Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
- Sobre la educación y sus problemas.Simón Saulmann &T. Carlos -1962 - Santiago de Chile,:Export citation Bookmark
- Yi Pyŏng-hŏn chŏnjip.Pyŏng-hŏn Yi -1989 - Sŏul: Asea Munhwasa.Export citation Bookmark
- Ihak chippyŏn.Kŏn-hyu Yu -2013 - Kyŏngbuk Andong-si: Han'guk Kukhak Chinhŭngwŏn.Export citation Bookmark
| 1 — 50 / 956 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-db4gm uwo