Works by Werner Leinfellner
27 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Einführung in die Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie.Werner Leinfellner -1967 -Synthese 17 (1):109-111.
- Die Entstehung der Theorie.Werner Leinfellner -1966 - München,: Alber.No categories
- A reconstruction of Schlick's psycho-sociological ethics.Werner Leinfellner -1985 -Synthese 64 (3):317 - 349.
- Game Theory, Experience, Rationality: Foundations of Social Sciences, Economics and Ethics in honor of John C. Harsanyi.John C. Harsanyi,Werner Leinfellner &Eckehart Köhler -1998 - Springer Verlag.When von Neumann's and Morgenstern's Theory of Games and Economic Behavior appeared in 1944, one thought that a complete theory of strategic social behavior had appeared out of nowhere. However, game theory has, to this very day, remained a fast-growing assemblage of models which have gradually been united in a new social theory - a theory that is far from being completed even after recent advances in game theory, as evidenced by the work of the three Nobel Prize winners, John (...) F. Nash, John C. Harsanyi, and Reinhard Selten. Two of them, Harsanyi and Selten, have contributed important articles to the present volume. This book leaves no doubt that the game-theoretical models are on the right track to becoming a respectable new theory, just like the great theories of the twentieth century originated from formerly separate models which merged in the course of decades. For social scientists, the age of great discover ies is not over. The recent advances of today's game theory surpass by far the results of traditional game theory. For example, modem game theory has a new empirical and social foundation, namely, societal experiences; this has changed its methods, its "rationality. " Morgenstern (I worked together with him for four years) dreamed of an encompassing theory of social behavior. With the inclusion of the concept of evolution in mathematical form, this dream will become true. Perhaps the new foundation will even lead to a new name, "conflict theory" instead of "game theory. (shrink)
- Die Entstehung der Theorie.Werner Leinfellner -1968 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29 (2):317-317.No categories
- Die Theorie der somatisch-neuronalen Entstehung von Werten, die a-chronologische Gedächtniszeit und die Verschränkung von Zeit und Bewerten.Werner Leinfellner -2006 - In Friedrich Stadler & Michael Stöltzner,Time and History: Proceedings of the 28. International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium, Kirchberg Am Wechsel, Austria 2005. Frankfurt, Germany: De Gruyter. pp. 387-408.No categories
- Ein formaler zugang zu wittgensteins philosophie.Werner Leinfellner -1978 - In Elisabeth Leinfellner,Wittgenstein and his impact on contemporary thought: proceedings of the Second International Wittgenstein Symposium, 29th August to 4th September 1977, Kirchberg/Wechsel (Austria) ; editors, Elisabeth Leinfellner... [et al.]. Hingham, Mass.: D. Reidel Pub. Co.. pp. 2--97.No categoriesExport citation
Bookmark - Einführung in die Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie.Werner Leinfellner -1967 - Mannhein,: Bibliographisches Institut.No categories
- Foundations of the Realizing, the Technological, and the Cognitive Sciences.Werner Leinfellner -1973 -Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy 2:339-342.No categories
- Game Theory, Sociodynamics, and Cultural Evolution.Werner Leinfellner -1998 -Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 5:197-210.Since Neumann and Morgenstern’s theory of games, the debate among social scientists, economists, mathematicians, and social philosophers about what kind of theory it is has not ended. Some think that it is a new interdiscipline, some that it is a mere accumulation of gametheoretical models, such as utility theory, competitive, cooperative, collective choice models, and so on. Most of them agree that the models of game theory deal with isolated, single, and independent specific societal interactions between individuals who wish to (...) maximize their gains and minimize their losses within prescribed constraining rules. (shrink)
- Historical Time and a New Conception of the Historical Sciences.Werner Leinfellner -1973 - In Mario Bunge,The methodological unity of science. Boston,: Reidel. pp. 193--215.
- Introduction.Werner Leinfellner -1998 -Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 5:1-8.When von Neumann’s and Morgenstern’s Theory of Games and Economic Behavior appeared in 1944, one thought that a complete theory of strategic social behavior had appeared out of nowhere. However, game theory has, to this very day, remained a fast-growing assemblage of models which have gradually been united in a new social theory — a theory that is far from being completed even after recent advances in game theory, as evidenced by the work of the three Nobel Prize winners, John (...) F. Nash, John C. Harsanyi, and Reinhard Selten. Two of them, Harsanyi and Selten, have contributed important articles to the present volume. This book leaves no doubt that the game-theoretical models are on the right track to becoming a respectable new theory, just like the great theories of the twentieth century originated from formerly separate models which merged in the course of decades. For social scientists, the age of great discoveries is not over. The recent advances of today’s game theory surpass by far the results of traditional game theory. For example, modern game theory has a new empirical and social foundation, namely, societal experiences; this has changed its methods, its “rationality.” Morgenstern dreamed of an encompassing theory of social behavior. With the inclusion of the concept of evolution in mathematical form, this dream will become true. Perhaps the new foundation will even lead to a new name, “conflict theory” instead of “game theory.”. (shrink)
- Is Wittgenstein a Transcendental Philosopher? (Wittgenstein and Kant).Werner Leinfellner -1982 -Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 38 (1):13 - 27.
- Kausalität in den Sozialwissenschaften.Werner Leinfellner -1981 - In Günter Posch,Kausalität: Neue Texte. Stuttgart: Reclam. pp. 221--260.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Language and Ontology.Werner Leinfellner (ed.) -1982 - Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky / Reidel.
- Schlicks kognitive Erkenntnistheorie als Wissenschaftstheorie.Werner Leinfellner -1982 -Grazer Philosophische Studien 16 (1):103-127.Es wird gezeigt, daß Schlicks physikalischer Denkansatz in der Erkenntnislehre sich wesentlich vom sprachanalytischen Denkansatz in der analytischen Wissenschafts- und Erkenntnistheorie unterscheidet. In der Schlickschen Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie fällt, für gewisse implizit definierte Strukturen, der Gegensatz von analytisch und synthetisch weg, wodurch Schlick in schärfsten Gegensatz sowohl zur Kantischen Wissenschaftsphüosophie, wie auch zu der des Wiener Kreises gerät. Auch die anthropologische Fundierung von Schlicks Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie unterscheidet diese wesentlich von der des Wiener Kreises. Schlick hat ein originelles eigenes Bild (...) der Wissenschaften und eüie eigene Wissenschaftstheorie geschaffen, die im weitesten Umfange in der phliosophischen Tradition steht und diese sogar entscheidend umgewandelt hat. (shrink)No categories
- Schlicks kognitive Erkenntnistheorie als Wissenschaftstheorie.Werner Leinfellner -1982 -Grazer Philosophische Studien 16 (1):103-127.Es wird gezeigt, daß Schlicks physikalischer Denkansatz in der Erkenntnislehre sich wesentlich vom sprachanalytischen Denkansatz in der analytischen Wissenschafts- und Erkenntnistheorie unterscheidet. In der Schlickschen Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie fällt, für gewisse implizit definierte Strukturen, der Gegensatz von analytisch und synthetisch weg, wodurch Schlick in schärfsten Gegensatz sowohl zur Kantischen Wissenschaftsphüosophie, wie auch zu der des Wiener Kreises gerät. Auch die anthropologische Fundierung von Schlicks Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie unterscheidet diese wesentlich von der des Wiener Kreises. Schlick hat ein originelles eigenes Bild (...) der Wissenschaften und eüie eigene Wissenschaftstheorie geschaffen, die im weitesten Umfange in der phliosophischen Tradition steht und diese sogar entscheidend umgewandelt hat. (shrink)No categories
- Struktur und Aufbau wissenschaftlicher Theorien: Eine wissenschaftstheoretisch-philosophische Untersuchung.Werner Leinfellner -1967 -Synthese 17 (1):111-113.No categories
- Struktur und Aufbau wissenschaftlicher Theorien.Werner Leinfellner -1965 - Wien, Würzburg: Physica-Verlag.No categories
- The Foundation of Human Evaluation in Democracies from Ramsey to Damasio.Werner Leinfellner -2006 -Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 12:139-153.
- The naturalistic versus the intuitionistic school of values.Werner Leinfellner &Edward Booth -1977 - In Maurice Allais & Ole Hagen,Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. D. Reidel. pp. 303--332.
- Letters to the Editor.Thomas Steinbuch,Alan Gewirth &Werner Leinfellner -1991 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 65 (1):33 - 35.No categories
- Sprache und Ontologie: Akten des sechsten Internationalen Wittgenstein-Symposiums, 23. bis 30. August 1981, Kirchberg am Wechsel (Österreich).Eric Kraemer,Werner Leinfellner &Jeffrey Schank (eds.) -1982 - Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
- Die Aufgaben der Philosophie in der Gegenwart: Akten des 10. Internationalen Wittgenstein Symposiums, 18. bis 25. August 1985, Kirchberg am Wechsel (Österreich).Werner Leinfellner &Franz M. Wuketits (eds.) -1986 - Hingham, Ma.: Distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Kluwer.Export citation Bookmark
- Language and Ontology. Proceedings of the 6th International Wittgenstein Symposium 23rd to 30th August 1981, Kirchberg Wechsel, Austria. [REVIEW]Werner Leinfellner,Eric Kraemer &Jeffrey Schank -1984 -Studia Logica 43 (3):306-307.Export citation Bookmark
- Rezension. [REVIEW]Werner Leinfellner -1965 -Philosophia Naturalis 10 (1):126-128.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Sprache und Ontologie: Akten des sechsten Internationalen Wittgenstein-Symposiums, 23. bis 30. August 1981, Kirchberg am Wechsel (Österreich).Werner Leinfellner,Eric Kraemer &Jeffrey Schank (eds.) -1982 - Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-nwt9g uwo